OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs TestObject comparison

OpenText and Sauce Labs are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Sauce Labs is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 3.7% mindshare in MTT, compared to Sauce Labs’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews

589 Views
359 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review

70 Views
32 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

TestObject

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT Digital Lab and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th)

TestObject

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestObject is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

RajeevSAwant

Head Automation CoE at Truglobal

Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation

This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features. It has integrated seamlessly with our framework and provides very wide coverage. It offers very comprehensive reporting and allows us to drill down to the various levels of the automation and respective application performance. What TestObject provides is not available from other service providers. The kind of detailed reporting provided is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The product is easy to use."

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 29% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 22% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 14% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 13% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

December 2024

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

December 2024

Download TestObject product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Video not available

Sauce Labs

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

BW Bank, Telefonica

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Ranorex and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.