Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

OpenText and Panaya are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Panaya is ranked #27. OpenText holds a 9.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Panaya’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panaya users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 7,705 Views
  • 4,836 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Panaya Test Dynamix
Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews
  • 832 Views
  • 441 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Panaya Test Dynamix compete in the software testing industry. OpenText UFT One stands out with its robust feature set, while Panaya Test Dynamix appeals through its efficient deployment model and ease of use.

Features: OpenText UFT One includes advanced scripting capabilities, broad technology support, and a versatile automation framework. Panaya Test Dynamix focuses on agility with code-free testing and accelerated test cycles, enhancing productivity for teams unfamiliar with scripting.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One could improve its setup process and broaden its customer support approach. Additionally, offering more affordable pricing tiers might enhance its market position. Panaya Test Dynamix can improve by providing more advanced testing features and integrating more comprehensive reporting tools. Enhancing scalability for larger projects could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One requires a more complex setup and offers traditional customer service. Panaya Test Dynamix provides a cloud-based, straightforward deployment model with proactive and responsive support, facilitating user onboarding efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One involves a higher initial cost justified by its extensive capabilities and long-term benefits in complex environments. Panaya Test Dynamix is a cost-effective alternative, offering faster ROI through its efficient deployment and simple testing process.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText UFT One enhances efficiency and productivity with automation, AI capabilities, and supports achieving up to 300% ROI.
Sentiment score
5.0
Panaya Test Dynamix improved test efficiency, reduced manual efforts, and provided measurable benefits in productivity, cost-effectiveness, and resource allocation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText UFT One's customer service is generally efficient but inconsistent, with varied experiences in support quality and response time.
Sentiment score
5.7
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText UFT One is scalable, integrating with Jenkins, but success depends on licensing, automation quality, and deployment strategy.
Sentiment score
7.3
Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText UFT One generally exhibits stability, though some users report performance issues, often resolved through updates. Satisfaction remains high.
Sentiment score
7.8
Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One requires improvements in stability, compatibility, speed, memory use, object recognition, and integration with open-source tools.
Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
 

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One licensing is costly, leading organizations to mix different license types and evaluate ROI against open-source alternatives.
Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One provides versatile automation with cross-platform compatibility, easy use, robust testing, and integration with key technologies.
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report
Badari Mallireddy - PeerSpot reviewer
AG
Pierre CAHAY - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
2nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
Panaya Test Dynamix
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
27th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Defect Tracking (5th), Test Management Tools (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.9%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Alain Vanhaeght - PeerSpot reviewer
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 9% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 62% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 13% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 9% of the time
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 9% of the time
Selenium HQ vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Selenium HQ vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 7% of the time
More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
January 2025
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
January 2025
Panaya Test Dynamix reportDownload Panaya Test Dynamix product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
No data available
 

Learn More

OpenText
Panaya
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
January 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.