OpenText UFT One vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

OpenText and Panaya are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Panaya is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 9.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Panaya’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panaya users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT One

Read 93 OpenText UFT One reviews

8,465 Views
5,308 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

862 Views
445 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Panaya Test Dynamix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Panaya Test Dynamix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Customer Service

No sentiment score available

OpenText customer service is praised for responsiveness, though experiences vary, with mixed satisfaction levels and reliance on partners for support.

No sentiment score available

Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score

5.5

OpenText UFT One needs better object identification, browser compatibility, AI, integration, and interface, with concerns on cost and stability.

Sentiment score

5.8

Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

OpenText UFT One offers scalability and flexibility, though users note speed and browser issues; licensing affects usage costs.

Sentiment score

6.1

Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available

OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation but criticized for high costs and complex licensing options.

No sentiment score available

Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

OpenText UFT One's stability is generally reliable but varies with system requirements and can be affected by version changes.

Sentiment score

8.5

Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Valuable Features

Sentiment score

8.5

OpenText UFT One excels in cross-platform compatibility, versatile scripting, and efficient automation for desktop, web, and mobile testing.

Sentiment score

8.0

Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.

The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.

Andres_Gomez

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Panaya Test Dynamix report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (2nd), Test Management Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?

The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?

Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 67% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 15% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 7% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

November 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

November 2024

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Panaya

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

November 2024

Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT One vs. Panaya Test Dynamix report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.