Oracle API Management vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle API Management

Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews

483 Views
360 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

3,033 Views
2,148 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle API Management

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle API Management and webMethods.io are competing in the API Management space. While Oracle API Management is recognized for its robust integration capabilities, webMethods.io seems to lead in flexibility and ease of use, making it a compelling choice for organizations seeking adaptable solutions.

Features: Oracle API Management features powerful analytics, comprehensive security, and strong integration capabilities. On the other hand, webMethods.io offers broad integration options, a simplified setup process, and adaptability, catering to various organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: Oracle API Management could benefit from simplifying its deployment model and reducing complexity to enhance accessibility. Additionally, improving the user interface and ease of use would make it more appealing for smaller businesses. Enhancements in API customizations and real-time monitoring would also be advantageous. webMethods.io could improve by expanding features for API governance and enhancing its scalability for large enterprises. Developing more robust reporting tools and enhancing technical support for troubleshooting can also improve the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle API Management offers a detailed but complex deployment model with strong enterprise support, ideally suited for large-scale implementations. In contrast, webMethods.io provides a seamless cloud-based deployment model, simplifying processes with accessible customer support, ideal for businesses with limited IT resources.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle API Management requires a higher upfront investment, targeting enterprises seeking long-term stability and returns. Conversely, webMethods.io is more cost-effective with a quicker ROI, accommodating businesses that prioritize fiscal flexibility and rapid deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle API Management

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sagar SampadMall

IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd

Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure

My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."

"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

"The stability is good."

"Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."

"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

"The deployment should be simplified."

"I would like to see the price improve."

"The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long"

"The learning curve is a little steep at first."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle API Management?

It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?

We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Oracle API Management

Compared 58% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management

Compared 23% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management

Compared 19% of the time

More Oracle API Management Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management

March 2025

Download Oracle API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Free Report: Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle API Management vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.