Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Oracle and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #25, while Progress Software is ranked #24. Oracle holds a 1.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

955 Views
554 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,024 Views
655 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Telerik Test Studio are competitors in the software testing tools market. Oracle Application Testing Suite maintains an advantage in environments integrated with Oracle infrastructure, while Telerik Test Studio is favored for its user-friendly nature and diverse application compatibility.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for automated regression, load testing, and deep Oracle integration, aiding complex Oracle environments. Telerik Test Studio features intuitive design, extensive web and desktop application compatibility, and facilitates both functional and load testing.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve in terms of a more streamlined deployment process, enhanced interface simplicity, and compatibility with non-Oracle applications. Telerik Test Studio could benefit from advanced reporting tools, integration with more third-party tools, and improved performance for complex test cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite may have a complex and lengthy deployment process but offers comprehensive support provided by Oracle. Telerik Test Studio is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and reliable support, making it suitable for agile teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite often involves higher upfront costs due to specialized integration, delivering substantial ROI within Oracle-centric environments. Telerik Test Studio offers a more cost-effective entry point and quicker ROI, attributed to its ease of use and flexible testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

Cons

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 23% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 37% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

OATS

No data available

Overview

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

February 2025

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Load Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.