Oracle HFM vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

SAS Activity-Based Management and Oracle HFM compete in the financial management software category. Oracle HFM often seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features that justify its higher cost.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management provides detailed cost analysis, an OLAP drilling function for data presentation, and support for cost allocation calculations. Oracle HFM offers exceptional multi-currency handling, end-to-end data consolidation, and an equity pickup module for complex ownership structures.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management could enhance its data extraction tools and simplify some reporting processes. Its user interface may benefit from modernization, and support for additional data sources could be improved. Oracle HFM may optimize its deployment time, better integrate with non-Oracle data sources, and streamline its user training process for increased accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management is known for its straightforward deployment, supported by robust customer assistance that aids in quick adoption. Oracle HFM, while involving a more complex deployment, benefits from Oracle's extensive support network that provides comprehensive post-implementation help.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management is recognized for its competitive pricing, offering a fast ROI due to efficient cost management. Although Oracle HFM has a higher initial cost, it offers a substantial ROI through extensive features and scalability, making it a valuable investment for those needing thorough financial solutions.