Oracle Java DB vs SAP IQ comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while SAP is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 0.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle Java DB

Read 9 Oracle Java DB reviews

540 Views
421 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

SAP IQ

Read 21 SAP IQ reviews

364 Views
264 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Oracle Java DB

SAP IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP IQ and Oracle Java DB compete in the database management system market. SAP IQ may have the upper hand in robust data analytics capabilities, while Oracle Java DB is preferred for its seamless Java application integration.

Features: SAP IQ offers high-performance analytics, scalability, and data compression, excelling in large-scale data management and complex queries. Oracle Java DB is valued for its small footprint, ease of Java integration, and versatility, making it an excellent choice for developers looking for a lightweight database solution.

Room for Improvement: SAP IQ could benefit from improved user interface design, enhanced cloud integration, and reduced setup complexity. Oracle Java DB might improve with better scaling options, more comprehensive support for large datasets, and enhanced security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ is known for its straightforward deployment supported by comprehensive customer service, suitable for enterprise environments. Oracle Java DB offers a simple and quick setup process but has limited customer support, aligning with its lightweight database design.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ incurs higher initial costs, aligned with its powerful analytics capabilities and potential for significant ROI in data-intensive scenarios. Oracle Java DB, with lower setup costs, is appealing for budget-conscious projects, offering satisfactory ROI for smaller-scale applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Java DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP IQ

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Java DB is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP IQ is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at CGI

Able to process all the reporting and processing in the database itself

We have been upgrading and moving to new environments. I was involved in the solution's initial setup. Some things in the setup are very smooth sailing. However, some setups become complicated because what they set up doesn't meet your needs. So, some tweaking is necessary in certain instances. Having a good understanding of the tool really helps. Oracle Java DB is easy to deploy if it's a new setup. Migrating from an old environment to a new environment takes time because you need the old functionality. A first-time deployment of the application is easy. We just did a default setup and started using it. When we have to migrate, there is too much baggage behind that application, especially from the security point of view.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Columnar database, so pulling records is easy but there isn't enough documentation for installation

I've seen very few SAP IQ systems in recent years. So people are moving away from SAP IQ In the last three years, I've rarely encountered customers using it. Fewer systems with SAP IQ usage among our customers. Most of them have moved on to HANA. There are parallel products, and there are also viable alternatives from AWS, so many have migrated to those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."

"The valuable features include connecting to the database and retrieving data."

"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."

"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."

"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."

"The solution is stable."

"The database is quite robust in terms of performance from the SQL side."

"It's very clever."

More Oracle Java DB pros

"IQ is a very high-performance and high-transaction database."

"It is very robust for ad hoc DW queries and its columnar compression is unique and valuable."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The product is easy to learn."

"Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database."

"Valuable features for us include the compression, speed, fast response time, and easy object maintenance."

"The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves moving data from SAP HANA to SAP NLS, which is essentially archiving. This allows us to retain access to the data via a link whenever it is required."

"Columnar storage allows high compression, high load rates and high query performance."

More SAP IQ pros

Cons

"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."

"The tool might be integrated, but we see performance issues because of overhead."

"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."

"Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database."

"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."

"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."

"Multiplex is very problematic. There are consistency problems in the metadata, meaning it is possible to lose metadata consistency. You should make sure you have healthy backups."

"The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future."

"The only negative aspect of IQ is the cost, which can be challenging for companies in Peru."

"The tool gets stuck sometimes."

"The room for improvement would be the marketing of the product, because this product is much better than advertised."

"I think the universe should be part of the Sybase IQ tool set."

"There is very little documentation available."

"Concurrency and functional error messaging."

More SAP IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle Java DB is a pricey solution."

"The product's pricing is very friendly, with no extra costs after the licensing fees."

"It's not that costly. So, the pricing is cheap."

"Negotiate based on the features required."

"The cost of implementation is about $3,000."

"Negotiation is very important."

"Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons."

"The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

45%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Java DB?

Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database. Various ways of connecting would enhance functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Java DB?

I have experience connecting to a database with Java by using Java code and interrogating the database.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Java DB?

It's important to consider several settings and connection strings, as well as firewall rules when connecting to the database. I would rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP IQ?

IQ implementation costs about three thousand dollars. It's less expensive compared to alternatives like Teradata Base in terms of transactional efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP IQ?

The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP IQ?

I worked on implementing new databases, migration data in production, and developer environments with SAP IQ.

See all answers

Comparisons

MySQL vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 52% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle Java DB Competitors

Snowflake vs SAP IQ

Compared 31% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 15% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Hadoop vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Oracle Java DB product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ

March 2025

Download SAP IQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase IQ

Overview

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

Oracle

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SAP

Sample Customers

Université Nice Sophia Antipolis

ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Java DB vs. SAP IQ report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.