Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

8,785 Views
7,651 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key competitors in the database solutions market. PostgreSQL is often seen as having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness derived from its open-source nature.

Features: PostgreSQL is renowned for its support of complex queries, strong SQL standards compliance, and reliability across a range of environments. It offers extensive language support and is fully ACID compliant, making it well-suited for organizations requiring robust transaction handling. Conversely, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is distinguished by its multiple storage engine capabilities, providing flexible data storage, and its architecture allows for rapid query processing ideal for speed-focused applications.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can be less efficient in handling a high volume of records and may struggle with certain SQL queries MySQL manages well. Additionally, it can be slower with read-only queries. MySQL benefits from enhancements in cloud scalability and would be more versatile with additional out-of-the-box features. Improving support for advanced features could augment MySQL's appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL's deployment is versatile across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, supported by a substantial community. However, its reliance on community support can vary in effectiveness. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers streamlined cloud deployment options and established technical support, appealing to organizations that prioritize dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL offers significant cost advantages due to its open-source nature, eliminating licensing fees and offering favorable ROI for startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while more expensive due to licensing, justifies costs with strong performance and reliability, which can enhance ROI in performance-critical scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (10th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 18.2%, down from 21.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

AdityaSharma3

Vice President Business at Techmagnate: Digital Marketing Agency

Transaction processes are fast and good replication capability

Use cases include querying data warehouses and databases to fetch data for clients already working on PostgreSQL. We also use Postgres for building reports It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping. The query speed is fast, and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is good for tuning."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"It's a useful solution, that can be widely used."

"PostgreSQL is very powerful, easy to manage, and has many features."

"PostgreSQL is stable. It's available, stable, and reliable."

"The solution is quite stable."

"Initial setup is simple."

"The initial setup is quick and easy."

"The community support and the open-source community for it are good."

"It's a standard reliable database management system."

Cons

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"Instead of the installation agent downloading all the packages for the install, it should allow the user to download the packages separately on their own to do the install."

"There are several features I would like to improve that aren't working as expected. It's likely that the latest version is doing something that was missed in the previous versions. For example, the output parameters — the stored procedures — is something new in PostgreSQL that Firebird has already had for a long time."

"It still needs to be more mature and have some backup feature. We are normally dealing with Oracle's data, and we have very strong online tools to back up the data and do other things. PostgreSQL still needs to do more in this area as well as in the high availability area. There are many external tools that you can use for PostgreSQL's high availability, but there is no embedded tool within PostgreSQL for high availability. It could have a feature similar to Oracle for working on a distributed system. It can have some scripts to improve the monitoring and some tools to do performance analysis. We have a workaround for most of such requirements except for the support for a distributed system, which is very difficult to have. This area should be included in the core of the database itself."

"Sometimes, the views create problems. If you don't have the view, sometimes what happens is you need to have the drivers properly set up for PostgreSQL."

"There could be a plugin to distribute the data on servers for the product."

"There are some products out there that have a slightly different method of implementation for the SQL language. Some of those are slightly better in some areas, and PostgreSQL is slightly better in some areas. I would probably like to match all of those products together. It is just down to the functionality. For example, Oracle has a number of options within SQL that are outside of what you would class as the SQL standard. PostgreSQL misses some of those, but PostgreSQL does other things that are better than what Oracle does. I would like to merge those two products so that there is a certain amount of functionality in a single product."

"PostgreSQL could improve by adding data warehousing tools."

"They need to have a better graphical interface. There is a tool called pgAdmin 4 that they use, which is free. It is written in Java, and it is slow. They need to have a better product that is similar to Toad for Oracle, but, of course, it is hard to get something that's really great and free. Other than that, it is great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The license is expensive."

"The community version of Postgre is basically free."

"There is an annual license."

"PostgreSQL is open-source, so if capable admins are available then the setup cost can be $0."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"It is free. There is no license on it."

"It is free, but if you need support, you can go for the commercial version called EnterpriseDB. They provide paid support, and they can even do hosting for you if you want standby and support."

"It is free. In terms of operating costs, it basically needs the same platform on which Oracle runs."

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 54% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 46% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 37% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL

Compared 11% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

March 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

March 2025

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg