Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 125 PostgreSQL reviews

9,614 Views
8,191 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are key competitors in the database solutions market. PostgreSQL is often seen as having the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness derived from its open-source nature.

Features: PostgreSQL is renowned for its support of complex queries, strong SQL standards compliance, and reliability across a range of environments. It offers extensive language support and is fully ACID compliant, making it well-suited for organizations requiring robust transaction handling. Conversely, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is distinguished by its multiple storage engine capabilities, providing flexible data storage, and its architecture allows for rapid query processing ideal for speed-focused applications.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can be less efficient in handling a high volume of records and may struggle with certain SQL queries MySQL manages well. Additionally, it can be slower with read-only queries. MySQL benefits from enhancements in cloud scalability and would be more versatile with additional out-of-the-box features. Improving support for advanced features could augment MySQL's appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL's deployment is versatile across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, supported by a substantial community. However, its reliance on community support can vary in effectiveness. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers streamlined cloud deployment options and established technical support, appealing to organizations that prioritize dedicated assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL offers significant cost advantages due to its open-source nature, eliminating licensing fees and offering favorable ROI for startups and cost-conscious enterprises. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while more expensive due to licensing, justifies costs with strong performance and reliability, which can enhance ROI in performance-critical scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: January 2025).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (11th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 18.6%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

AdityaSharma3

Vice President Business at Techmagnate: Digital Marketing Agency

Transaction processes are fast and good replication capability

Use cases include querying data warehouses and databases to fetch data for clients already working on PostgreSQL. We also use Postgres for building reports It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping. The query speed is fast, and the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The product is easy to learn."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"The product is very similar to the SQL Server."

"It is easy to use."

"I like that you can move any relational database from Oracle to PostgreSQL. I also like that it's pretty stable."

"The community support and the open-source community for it are good."

"It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping."

"The system can perform faster analysis by providing it with a lot of memory. Speed is crucial for analytics. Currently, the main reason we haven't adopted Elasticsearch is that we lack the necessary expertise to manage it."

"The main value is that it is open source, which means it is free. Our organization has the initiative to go to open source to cut down on cost. Oracle costs us $6 million a year right now, which is killing us, and Postgres costs nothing. So, there is a big push to go to Postgres."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

Cons

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."

"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."

"The user interface is not simple."

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"The price could be better."

"They need to have a better graphical interface. There is a tool called pgAdmin 4 that they use, which is free. It is written in Java, and it is slow. They need to have a better product that is similar to Toad for Oracle, but, of course, it is hard to get something that's really great and free. Other than that, it is great."

"It would be great if the solution offered even more integration capabilities."

"The pricing could be better."

"It would be good to have machine learning functionality in this solution, similar to Microsoft SQL Server and other solutions. Machine learning capability for a basic level or a common user would be useful. It can also have good reporting capabilities."

"The solution needs to improve the query, documentation, and JSON data functionality."

"The solution could improve the integration."

"If it was free to use, it would be the perfect solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The product is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"It is an open-source product."

"The license is expensive."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"It is free. There is no license on it."

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

"Affordable solution."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."

"The community version of Postgre is basically free."

"It is free. In terms of operating costs, it basically needs the same platform on which Oracle runs."

"PostgreSQL is open-source, so if capable admins are available then the setup cost can be $0."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have only used the community edition and do not have experience with the enterprise edition or its pricing.

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries.

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What do you like most about PostgreSQL?

It's a transactional database, so we use Postgres for most of our reporting. That's where it's helping.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

The tool is free of cost. For now, it's not about making money. But once we perfect it, we can offer it to customers willing to pay for support and other services. Most of my deployments are free.

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 57% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 38% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 15% of the time

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

February 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

February 2025

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg