EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews

14,910 Views
11,779 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are leading competitors in the database solution market. PostgreSQL holds the edge for budget-conscious users due to its open-source, cost-free access, while EDB Postgres Advanced Server is preferred by organizations seeking enhanced enterprise features and support.

Features: PostgreSQL excels in spatial support, making it useful for GIS applications. It also supports clustering, replication, and high availability through various extensions and cloud configurations. EDB Postgres Advanced Server adds to these capabilities with enhanced compatibility and performance tuning, particularly well-suited for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and Oracle compatibility.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve its user-friendliness and administrative tools such as pgAdmin, as well as enhance performance in handling large datasets. EDB Postgres Advanced Server could benefit from better monitoring tools and clearer documentation for new users integrating containerized solutions, in addition to improved support for JSONB data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL offers flexible deployment across on-premises and cloud configurations, supported by a strong open-source community. EDB Postgres Advanced Server, tailored for enterprise environments, provides enhanced deployment options and comprehensive support, although this adds to the cost compared to PostgreSQL’s community-based support.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL stands out for its cost efficiency, being free and maintaining no licensing fees, which appeals to startups and budget-focused enterprises. EDB Postgres Advanced Server, with licensing costs, justifies the expense with substantial ROI through its advanced features that facilitate scaling and efficient management, attracting larger organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: November 2026).

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

128

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 11.5%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	11.5%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server	2.4%
Other	86.1%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Shardul Borhade

Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees

Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work

What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is user-friendly."

"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."

"Cost/benefit wise Postgres is a great solution."

"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."

"Postgres is highly compatible with many software and programming languages. Its compatibility is excellent, covering nearly everything related to data engineering or migration."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server has positively impacted my organization by being cost-saving compared to databases such as Oracle, while providing smooth performance that simplifies production operations with less downtime and effort, especially in a cloud environment where we can utilize containerized services."

"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."

"Major reduction in run cost, and a quantum leap in the flexibility of deployment models Elimination of replication of transaction from reporting systems Able to do rolling upgrades with zero production downtime."

Cons

"The lack of additional security features is really the thing that makes the product less useful."

"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."

"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."

"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."

"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."

"From a pricing perspective, I do not find it cost-effective from DBtune's SaaS perspective as we are just testing it, but for enterprises, it is worth it as you do not require many engineers for management and receive good support."

"For improvement purposes, I think EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs some enhanced monitoring since the current default monitoring is not sufficient; an EDB monitoring tool could provide useful metrics to help end users avoid production issues."

"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."

"I have been working on the community edition."

"Our company pays for it. There are free versions available, but for advanced features, you obviously have to pay."

"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."

"The solution requires a license."

"It is an open-source platform."

"It could be much cheaper. If you would like to build an application on Amazon today, PostgreSQL is the standard database with Redshift. If you want other databases, you can add them, but PostgreSQL is the basis of everything. It's a question of money, that's it."

"It is free. There is no license on it."

"There is an annual license."

"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it is very cost-efficient, easy to set up, and can be deployed in a containerized manner.

What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

For improvement purposes, I think EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs some enhanced monitoring since the current default monitoring is not sufficient; an EDB monitoring tool could provide useful met...

What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

My main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that we have a telecommunication billing product where I am using it as a backend database to handle all the requests. A specific example of how...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I am not directly involved in the licensing or procurement decisions, so I cannot comment in detail on the price. From an engineering perspective, PostgreSQL is cost-efficient because it is open so...

What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?

While improving reliability, I have noticed that the limitations in PostgreSQL can be complex. For large-scale deployments, configuration, performance tuning, and related tasks can be complex and i...

Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

Firebird SQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 11% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

OpenSearch vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

November 2026

Download EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

October 2026

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.

Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg