No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

EnterpriseDB and PostgreSQL are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while PostgreSQL is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.2% mindshare in OSD, compared to PostgreSQL’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of PostgreSQL users who would recommend it.
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Read 11 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews
  • 1,965 Views
  • 1,965 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
PostgreSQL
Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews
  • 13,460 Views
  • 10,768 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are leading competitors in the database management system space. EDB Postgres Advanced Server seems to have an edge for users prioritizing Oracle compatibility and advanced support offerings.

Features: PostgreSQL features robust support for spatial data and full-text search. It offers a wide range of extensions like PostGIS. EDB Postgres Advanced Server includes Oracle compatibility, offering scalability and performance enhancements.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve database migration simplicity and pgAdmin's interface. Enhancing query profiling and monitoring solutions is also suggested. EDB Postgres Advanced Server may benefit from better JSONB query support and performance optimization for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL supports varied environments, including on-premises and cloud, with strong community backing. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers enhanced support management options and better customer service via support contracts.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, appealing to cost-conscious startups and enterprises. EDB Postgres Advanced Server also offers favorable pricing for Oracle compatibility needs, although there are costs associated with extensive support or large data handling, yet both provide strong ROI potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: August 2026).
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
August 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PostgreSQL
Ranking in Open Source Databases
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
128
Ranking in other categories
Vector Databases (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 12.6%, down from 17.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PostgreSQL12.6%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server2.2%
Other85.2%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

SB
Shardul Borhade
Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work
What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.
Read full review
Shobhit Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Shobhit Goel
Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient
High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency
The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Postgres is highly compatible with many software and programming languages. Its compatibility is excellent, covering nearly everything related to data engineering or migration."
"I would highly recommend EDB Postgres Advanced Server to others."
"The product is user-friendly."
"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."
"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."
"The feature of vector database management for AI is quite interesting and impactful."
"What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive."
"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server pros
"As PostgreSQL is free, this enables us to develop applications without having to think about budgets, and give us greater flexibility."
"The PostgreSQL database is similar to the SQL Server but has a slightly different technology that has similar resources as well, and if the customer has the confidence using SQL Server, they will be fairly comfortable using this solution."
"PostgreSQL provides the perfect combination of freedom, reliability, stability, security, performance, power, and ease of use."
"PostgreSQL has complete SQL dialects and is useful for writing sophisticated and complex queries. We have experience with Oracle database. My partner is experienced in DDA and he writes sophisticated SQL queries. The solution helps to get the job done in the best possible way. In today’s age, most developers do not have strong SQL knowledge or language command. They find it difficult to write even a SQL statement. These developers write cool queries which perform badly on the database end. As DBAs, we constantly urge the developers not to write bad queries, help them learn more, and write placebo commands."
"We are able to create many different types of jobs and items with this solution making it one of the most valuable features."
"From our use of it, its stability and performance are the best features."
"Every feature in PG is first, present, but secondly mature and just works."
"Updatable views (also over multiple tables), array and JSON fields, and point-in-time backup and recovery (WAL files archiving) are very useful features."
More PostgreSQL pros
 

Cons

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."
"I have faced performance issues in the community edition."
"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."
"I would like to see improvements in the performance, especially in large-scale operations, as it currently cannot match Oracle's performance."
"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."
"Setting up MySQL is slightly more straightforward than Postgres."
"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."
"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server cons
"We often find the solution's datetime datatype challenging."
"It still needs to be more mature and have some backup feature. We are normally dealing with Oracle's data, and we have very strong online tools to back up the data and do other things. PostgreSQL still needs to do more in this area as well as in the high availability area. There are many external tools that you can use for PostgreSQL's high availability, but there is no embedded tool within PostgreSQL for high availability. It could have a feature similar to Oracle for working on a distributed system. It can have some scripts to improve the monitoring and some tools to do performance analysis. We have a workaround for most of such requirements except for the support for a distributed system, which is very difficult to have. This area should be included in the core of the database itself."
"Although there's documentation out there, it needs even better documentation."
"Sometimes, the views create problems. If you don't have the view, sometimes what happens is you need to have the drivers properly set up for PostgreSQL."
"It could be improved by using parallelization. You want basically, distributed computing."
"There is room to improve some user friendly properties such as input and output tools, some people may find interesting to implement MERGE as a SQL command."
"PostgreSQL is a stable system, but from a security point of view, it still needs improvement."
"I'd like to see better memory management. I think that that's one of the few areas that Postgres does not handle as well as MySQL does or did."
More PostgreSQL cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."
"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."
"I have been working on the community edition."
"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."
"It is an open-source product."
"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."
"The licensing model is good."
"We do not pay for licensing."
"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."
"It is also open-source so it is free."
"It is open source. There is no licensing."
"The tool is cheaply priced compared to other RDBMS providers in the market."
"The community version of Postgre is basically free."
More PostgreSQL pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise49
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
We obtained EPAS through our partnership with EDB using an enterprise deployment model on-premises. From a pure testing perspective for a startup like DBtune, the licensing can feel quite expensive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
Beyond the aspects that I mentioned about the enterprise manager PEM and UI complexities, I would like to see improvements in the pricing structure to accommodate startups and clearer centralized d...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
The main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server (EPAS) is within my work at DBtune, an AI-driven SaaS product for database optimization. I am responsible for developing and testing our platform'...
See all answers
How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?
I am not directly involved in the licensing or procurement decisions, so I cannot comment in detail on the price. From an engineering perspective, PostgreSQL is cost-efficient because it is open so...
See all answers
What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?
While improving reliability, I have noticed that the limitations in PostgreSQL can be complex. For large-scale deployments, configuration, performance tuning, and related tasks can be complex and i...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 14% of the time
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 14% of the time
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 8% of the time
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 12% of the time
MySQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
Chroma vs PostgreSQL Logo
Chroma vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
More PostgreSQL Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
August 2026
EDB Postgres Advanced Server reportDownload EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report
Buyer's Guide
PostgreSQL
August 2026
PostgreSQL reportDownload PostgreSQL product report
 

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
  • Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
  • JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
  • Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
  • PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.
Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
  • AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
  • Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
  • Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases. 

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable. 

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

PostgreSQL
 

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi
1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
August 2026
Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.