No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs PostgreSQL comparison

EnterpriseDB and PostgreSQL are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while PostgreSQL is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.2% mindshare in OSD, compared to PostgreSQL’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of PostgreSQL users who would recommend it.
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Read 11 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews
  • 1,847 Views
  • 1,847 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
PostgreSQL
Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews
  • 12,746 Views
  • 10,197 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server are leading competitors in the database management system space. EDB Postgres Advanced Server seems to have an edge for users prioritizing Oracle compatibility and advanced support offerings.

Features: PostgreSQL features robust support for spatial data and full-text search. It offers a wide range of extensions like PostGIS. EDB Postgres Advanced Server includes Oracle compatibility, offering scalability and performance enhancements.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve database migration simplicity and pgAdmin's interface. Enhancing query profiling and monitoring solutions is also suggested. EDB Postgres Advanced Server may benefit from better JSONB query support and performance optimization for large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL supports varied environments, including on-premises and cloud, with strong community backing. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers enhanced support management options and better customer service via support contracts.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, appealing to cost-conscious startups and enterprises. EDB Postgres Advanced Server also offers favorable pricing for Oracle compatibility needs, although there are costs associated with extensive support or large data handling, yet both provide strong ROI potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 904,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Ranking in Open Source Databases
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PostgreSQL
Ranking in Open Source Databases
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
128
Ranking in other categories
Vector Databases (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.2%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 13.0%, down from 17.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PostgreSQL13.0%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server2.2%
Other84.8%
Open Source Databases
 

Featured Reviews

SB
Shardul Borhade
Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work
What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.
Read full review
Shobhit Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Shobhit Goel
Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient
High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency
The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."
"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."
"I would highly recommend EDB Postgres Advanced Server to others."
"Major reduction in run cost, and a quantum leap in the flexibility of deployment models Elimination of replication of transaction from reporting systems Able to do rolling upgrades with zero production downtime."
"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."
"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."
"What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive."
"This product has allowed us to reduce costs in some parts of our infrastructure without losing functionality."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server pros
"We use the solution to conduct surveys and consider this approach to be one which is cheaper for us."
"From our use of it, its stability and performance are the best features."
"If you would like to build an application on Amazon today, PostgreSQL is the standard database with Redshift."
"Postgres SQL is quite a good database."
"The system can perform faster analysis by providing it with a lot of memory. Speed is crucial for analytics. Currently, the main reason we haven't adopted Elasticsearch is that we lack the necessary expertise to manage it."
"Great documentation, active community support, excellent management and development tools and availability on various platforms makes PostgreSQL a good data base management system."
"PostgreSQL makes it very adaptable to several descriptions of a record. Instead of having several tables or several relations for one entity, I can adapt this entity. It can be a multiform entity. For example, here in Mexico, a company and a person can be sold to us as a physical entity or a physical person."
"PostgreSQL is the world's most advanced and performant SQL database available."
More PostgreSQL pros
 

Cons

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."
"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."
"There aren't specific new features we wish to add."
"It suffers issues ranging from data corruption to failing to delete temporary files which then necessitate us having to perform server restarts."
"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."
"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."
"From a pricing perspective, I do not find it cost-effective from DBtune's SaaS perspective as we are just testing it, but for enterprises, it is worth it as you do not require many engineers for management and receive good support."
"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server cons
"I think that due to the lack of functionality for data warehousing, it is more suitable for operational information systems instead of BI systems."
"We don't have any use cases where we would use it in a large application as we do with Oracle."
"The performance is too low, although we haven't tested for this."
"Eliminate the transaction wraparound possibility. If transaction wraparound occurs it can be a major problem."
"I rate PostgreSQL as a nine out of ten and I choose to knock it down a point only because it could use a better graphic user-interface."
"They need to work towards making it work better in a cloud environment."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"This solution could be better integrated with other systems."
More PostgreSQL cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source product."
"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."
"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."
"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."
"I have been working on the community edition."
"The need for our customers to pay for licences is contingent on their projects and budgets."
"We do not pay for licensing."
"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."
"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."
"The solution requires a license."
"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."
"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."
"The tool is cheaply priced compared to other RDBMS providers in the market."
More PostgreSQL pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
904,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business58
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise49
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers both processor-based and user-based licensing options. The cost is reasonable, particularly for middle and lower-tier customers, but there are hiccups when deali...
See all answers
What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
It was challenging to think of improvements for Postgres. We did not choose to extend or add new features to Postgres since it already meets our needs so well. There aren't specific new features we...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
Our primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server was to study the code base behind it. We aimed to understand how it has been built, how the engine functions, the querying process, and what ki...
See all answers
How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?
I purchased from the marketplace, so licensing and pricing cost is acceptable. To be honest, there is a separate team who handles the cost of licensing everything. I have admin access on Azure and ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?
The only thing for PG vector is if the dimension limit could be increased. Currently, the dimension limit is around 1,000 to 1,052. If I need to increase the dimension to 3,000 or 5,000, that optio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 14% of the time
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Percona Server vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 13% of the time
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 9% of the time
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server Logo
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Compared 6% of the time
More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 13% of the time
MySQL vs PostgreSQL Logo
MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL Logo
LanceDB vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
Chroma vs PostgreSQL Logo
Chroma vs PostgreSQL
Compared 5% of the time
More PostgreSQL Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
July 2026
EDB Postgres Advanced Server reportDownload EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report
Buyer's Guide
PostgreSQL
July 2026
PostgreSQL reportDownload PostgreSQL product report
 

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
  • Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
  • JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
  • Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
  • PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.
Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?
  • Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
  • AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
  • Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
  • Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases. 

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable. 

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

PostgreSQL
 

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi
1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg
Buyer's Guide
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
June 2026
Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL
Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
904,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. PostgreSQL report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.