Oracle VM VirtualBox vs RHEV comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Hat is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.4. Oracle holds a 8.4% mindshare in SVS, compared to Red Hat’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle VM VirtualBox

Read 63 Oracle VM VirtualBox reviews

19,076 Views
14,167 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

RHEV

Read 34 RHEV reviews

5,726 Views
4,219 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Oracle VM VirtualBox

RHEV

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

RHEV and Oracle VM VirtualBox are two competing products in the virtualization market. RHEV holds an edge in enterprise settings due to its integration capabilities and stability, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox is preferred for flexibility and ease of use.

Features: RHEV is recognized for its robust management capabilities, high compatibility with enterprise systems, and it supports up to 160 cores and up to 2 TB RAM, making it suitable for extensive IT needs. Oracle VM VirtualBox allows for broad Operating System compatibility, a straightforward setup for creating VLANs and interface groups, and supports sharing of USB devices between host and VMs.

Room for Improvement: RHEV could improve in reducing setup complexities and making high-level features more accessible to smaller businesses. It might also benefit from a more intuitive interface and broader community support. Oracle VM VirtualBox could enhance its performance on high-demand systems and refine its support for more complex enterprise-level operations. Its interface could be updated to cater to more advanced needs, and official support options could be expanded beyond community forums.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RHEV offers an extensive but more involved deployment process, supported by strong customer service ideal for enterprises. Oracle VM VirtualBox stands out with its straightforward deployment process, requiring minimal configuration and offering community-based customer support, which increases accessibility for smaller organizations and individual users.

Pricing and ROI: RHEV tends to have higher initial setup costs due to its focus on enterprise-grade infrastructure, offering significant ROI for businesses with rigorous virtualization needs. Oracle VM VirtualBox is free, making it a cost-effective solution for smaller operations, offering good ROI by minimizing upfront expenses and maintaining essential features without added costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle VM VirtualBox

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

RHEV

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Oracle VM VirtualBox is 8.4%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 3.9%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Kopano Ramaphoi

Consultant at SmartCloud

A flexible and easy-to-deploy product that provides a great user experience

The product should improve its scalability. It should be more flexible to be used with desktops with different capacities. We do not have much storage on our desktops, and we must allocate a certain amount of memory to install the product. When we install a virtual machine, we have a limit that we cannot exceed 80% of RAM.

Read full review

Sujeet-Kumar

Project Manager Cloud Infrastructure at Path Infotech ltd

The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage

Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is extremely easy to install, use, has a great GUI and is incredibly stable."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy bidirectionally between the desktop and the virtual machine."

"Compatible with almost any operating system"

"The snapshot feature is very powerful; it protects us from disaster."

"It's very simple to use."

"This solution creates a snapshot of virtual machines so you can create test environments."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that there is no cost because it is open source."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox pros

"It's a scalable solution."

"The solution has a good licensing module."

"I can control and manage everything. I know everything that's cooking inside. This is the best part for me."

"The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good."

"The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware."

"Technically, the main reason why I'm using Red Hat is because of its stability."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."

"RHEV’s cost is much less compared to VMware."

More RHEV pros

Cons

"Oracle VMs don't have a solid web interface of their own. This is an area where Oracle is lagging behind. Now, we use headless servers, install Oracle VMs, and manage them remotely. We could use phpVirtual Box, but it is a third-party solution. A lot of people contribute to it, and it's not authenticated by Oracle. As a result, I don't find it to be a good option. Therefore, I would like to see Oracle offer an extension pack or a licensed version that fixes this problem."

"It's not as robust as server platforms, nor does it need to be."

"The installation is difficult and could be improved."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"One valuable feature would be for it to work right the first time but it doesn't necessarily do that."

"The solution needs to improve the methods used for starting and stopping the machine."

"This solution needs improvement with the business continuity planning, disaster and recovery management and using centralized data storage."

"It has some issues when you have some weird device drivers. For instance, when you have a weird sound driver working on your machine, and the VirtualBox needs to output the sound of the virtual machine into the sound driver of the physical machine, the bare metal, it doesn't work too well. If you tweak lots of drivers and play around with the different kinds of drivers and machines, you will probably break something. I have not played with it too much and maybe it already supports it, but it would probably be good to have the ability to use a container from the virtual machine environment instead of spinning off a complete virtual machine. There are other tools for that. On Linux, you have a DXE, LXC framework, and you have Docker as well. Docker is good because it is multi-platform, and you can run Docker on pretty much anything, even different processors, but it would be good if we had a VirtualBox running on it while spinning off containers instead of full virtual machines. The other thing that will become important, and I'm pretty sure that they are thinking about it as well is that there's this new hardware platform that Apple is releasing, which is an ARM-based new chip. So, VirtualBox will probably have to work on ARM-based CPUs as well."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox cons

"There is not any proper documentation on the site to reference."

"With RHEV, the cyberattacks should be fewer. I want RHEV to be better protected."

"We would like the dashboard feature of this solution to be improved, as it is not very detailed at present."

"This solution could be more secure."

"In comparison to VMware, this solution isn't as stable. We're testing it right now, and we're not trusting the stability of the product."

"It would be better to have more patches, especially kernel-level updates, live and online so that we can keep the business up and running during this period."

"We should improve how we manage storage domains and make more comprehensive control available through the command line."

"The availability of technical expertise with the solution may be limited in some areas."

More RHEV cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license I use is free."

"There are no licensing fees."

"The tool is not as expensive as other products."

"This is an open-source product and it can be used free of charge."

"Pricing does not apply for us, we do not have to pay for the service."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Available for free use"

"Everything is free within limitations. Once you go over a certain level of usage you have to license the product."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox pricing and cost advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."

"We are using the free version of Red Hat."

"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."

"This product has a variety of licensing options available. However, the level of licensing, and therefore the cost of licensing, is dependent on the number of servers being utilized."

"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."

"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."

"I believe we pay on a yearly basis."

More RHEV pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

University

Educational Organization

52%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does KVM compare to Oracle VM VirtualBox?

KVM is easy to use, stable and flexible. It is mature and very fast. It is an affordable open-source solution that is easy to set up and manage. It offers very good security. It has a virtual manag...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle VM VirtualBox?

The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle VM VirtualBox?

The pricing is flexible. When Oracle bought VirtualBox, they introduced some licensing issues. However, it did not affect the terms of licenses and additional costs. The price is okay. I rate the p...

See all answers

What do you like most about RHEV?

The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?

It should be more affordable and available. It should target companies, especially new ones, that need servers with capacities of around 518+ units. It should be priced appropriately because it mig...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RHEV?

We should improve how we manage storage domains and make more comprehensive control available through the command line. RHEV needs to consider those points that can be integrated. The REST API shou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 37% of the time

Oracle VM vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 14% of the time

KVM vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 13% of the time

Hyper-V vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Workstation vs Oracle VM VirtualBox

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Competitors

VMware vSphere vs RHEV

Compared 55% of the time

Proxmox VE vs RHEV

Compared 13% of the time

KVM vs RHEV

Compared 11% of the time

Hyper-V vs RHEV

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs RHEV

Compared 7% of the time

More RHEV Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox

January 2025

Download Oracle VM VirtualBox product report

Buyer's Guide

RHEV

January 2025

Download RHEV product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization

Learn More

Oracle

Red Hat

Overview

Oracle VM VirtualBox is a robust AMD64/Intel64 and x86 next-generation virtualization solution that functions well for home use and is also powerful enough to handle the needs of a busy enterprise organization. This professional solution is open source and provides super-fast high performance in addition to many outstanding value-added features. VirtualBox functions effectively on Windows, macOS, Solaris, Linux, and more. Users can benefit from VirtualBox's dedication to continually developing the product and providing continual progressive updates and releases. The solution is supported by a trusted dedicated professional community and is backed by Oracle, which guarantees that the product is able to consistently meet and exceed quality controls and protocols at all times.

Oracle VM VirtualBox Features

Oracle VM Virtual Box provides many value-added features. Some of these features include:

Consolidation: Oracle VM VirtualBox makes it easy for users to seamlessly run numerous virtual machines on a small number of hosts and will also facilitate comprehensive balancing of the loads between VMs. This helps to minimize and consolidate the hardware needed throughout the organization.
Diagnostics: VirtualBox provides excellent testing and disaster recovery. Users can use the virtual hard disk like a container. This container can be copied, frozen, backed up, or transported between hosts. Using the virtual machines (VMs), users can easily test multi-node network services for any networking, software configuration, or operating system issues.
Snapshots: Using snapshots, users are able to save or freeze a specific state of a VM and choose to revert back to the protected state if/when they desire. Users are able to make changes or experiment within the computing space. Should a problem arise, users can revert back to the selected snapshot; this makes the need for frequent backups and restores unnecessary.
Flexibility: The solution makes it easy to run different operating systems (OSes) at the same time. Users can run software designed for one OS on another OS. For example, users can easily run Windows on a MAC and not have to perform a reboot. As users can configure the kinds of virtual hardware to be presented with each OS, there is greater flexibility on which OS can be selected, and users can even choose older OSes or ones that are not currently supported by the original OS.
Cost-effective: Virtualization with Oracle VM VirtualBox enables users to considerably minimize overall costs by reducing the amount of hardware needed and the associated expenses of running the physical machines throughout an organization. This tremendous cost savings results in ROI being achieved in a very short period of time.

Reviews from Real Users

“Oracle VM VirtualBox is easy to use and does not require much training. It uses fewer resources. Teams using new operating system releases can quickly test and implement. This would make the development of new software releases faster and easier. It also helps users to write the program, test, and support it on multiple platforms. It has a good community as it is open-source.” - Satishbabu G., Oracle ACE

“It is easy to use and does not require complex knowledge. It uses less resources, which is a requirement as it is used to onboard hardware with very little resources available.” - A PeerSpot user who is an IT Architect - AI at CGI

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.

Sample Customers

Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

December 2024

Free Report: Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.