Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series support is praised for efficiency but has occasional issues with delays and communication. Ratings vary.
Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks WildFire customer service is praised for expertise but criticized for slow regional responses and handling critical cases.
The support quality could be improved.
The technical support is very good.
There is a lack of SLA adherence, and third-party partners do not provide prompt responses.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series needs modern interface updates, better scalability, and improved integration with AWS, Azure, and AI features.
Sentiment score
5.1
Palo Alto Networks WildFire needs enhanced protocol inspection, better integration, improved threat intelligence, intuitive interface, and automation with AI.
When managing the firewall, it involves a Strata Cloud web browser that requires improvement to enhance deployment ease and call center efficiency.
There is a need for two-factor authentication, particularly for VPN and CloudProtect.
The dashboard should provide better visibility, especially in showing how many files are sent to Wildfire and their findings.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers excellent scalability, suitable for various businesses with flexible cloud deployment and effective traffic management.
Sentiment score
8.0
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is praised for its scalability, adaptability, and versatility in diverse environments and network sizes.
If I were to rate it on a scale, it would receive nine out of ten, and with two-factor authentication, it would be ten.
Wildfire is highly scalable.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.1
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers strong firewall capabilities but is more costly with a complex licensing model.
Sentiment score
6.2
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is costly but valued for strong threat detection, with pricing varying by features and region.
The pricing is reasonable and reflects the quality of the product.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is highly stable and reliable, with minor update issues and seamless high-load performance.
Sentiment score
8.4
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is praised for its stability, reliability, seamless integration, and superior threat handling performance.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers advanced security, easy deployment, and seamless integration with cloud services, enhancing network protection.
Sentiment score
7.9
Palo Alto Networks WildFire offers robust malware protection with sandboxing, threat detection, real-time updates, and seamless Palo Alto integration.
We use these tools to prevent all known and unknown threats using Palo Alto Networks' Wildfire and other data filtering tools to gather information, analyze traffic, manage malicious traffic, and offer visibility, control, and attack prevention.
Palo Alto offers excellent security, with features such as email scanning, malware protection, and efficient VPN and antivirus capabilities.
The most valuable feature of Wildfire is its sandboxing capability for examining suspicious files or locations.
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (10th)
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks WildFire is 12.7%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

AshwaniTyagi - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced protection and good integration capabilities with good reliability
We use Palo Alto Networks VM-Series to offer services to our customers as a managed security service provider. We provide solutions and services to our customers across the globe. For example, if I want to host a firewall in the cloud or somewhere where the physical appliance is not a possibility…
Mario Lacroix - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides seamless automation functionality and has a straightforward setup process
The platform's most valuable feature is its seamless automation within the broader Palo Alto ecosystem. Its ability to function autonomously, with automatic updates and integration with tools like Panorama, significantly reduces manual intervention. Additionally, its threat detection capabilities allow us to respond quickly to potential incidents, and the system is self-sufficient, managing itself once configured.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user206346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2015
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Features comparison between Palo Alto and Fortinet firewalls
In the best tradition of these questions, Feature-wise both are quite similar, but each has things it's better at, it kind of depends what you value most. PA is good at app control, web filtering a...
How does Azure Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks VM Series?
Both products are very stable and easily scalable. The setup of Azure Firewall is easy and very user-friendly and the overall cost is reasonable. Azure Firewall offers a solid threat awareness, can...
How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?
The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly straightf...
Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?
FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy nav...
How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?
When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox featu...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Warren Rogers Associates
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.