Ranorex Studio vs pCloudy comparison

pCloudy and Ranorex are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. pCloudy is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ranorex is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5. pCloudy holds a 0.6% mindshare in MTT, compared to Ranorex’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of pCloudy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

290 Views
83 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

1,074 Views
789 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Ranorex Studio and pCloudy are competitive products in the field of testing solutions. Despite Ranorex Studio's favorable pricing and support, pCloudy's innovative features may appeal more to those seeking advanced capabilities.

Features: Ranorex Studio provides robust automation for desktop, web, and mobile applications with strong script reusability, supports a unified testing experience across platforms, and offers comprehensive features for automation. pCloudy offers a cloud-based mobile testing platform, supports parallel testing, and provides a wide range of device compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio has a straightforward installation process with effective traditional customer support. pCloudy offers seamless cloud-based deployment with extensive documentation and enables rapid deployment through its cloud model.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio requires a higher initial investment, delivering ROI through extensive test automation and reduced test cycle times. pCloudy provides a scalable pricing model that is more cost-effective for mobile-focused enterprises, aligning with its cloud services.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,849 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of pCloudy is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 8.9%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rabindra Kumar Maharana

Business Consultant at Laminaar Aviation

Very good on the UI level and reasonably priced

We are customers of pCloudy. We only use cloud devices and pCloudy is cheaper compared to Amazon and other tools. The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs. They can discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that. The connectivity…

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

"The product is very good on the UI level."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about pCloudy?

The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with pCloudy?

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for pCloudy?

My company's ground crew and cabin crew use an application. The solution helps the application to be compatible with other devices.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 23% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2025

Download pCloudy product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

March 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Overview

pCloudy is the next-gen mobile app testing platform powered by emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics. You can perform manual as well as automation testing on more than 5000 device-browser combination hosted on cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing, in-field user experience testing.

pCloudy

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy

March 2025

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.