We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"This is a customizable product."
"Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent support"
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The initial setup takes time."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"It should have integration with non-relational databases. A lot of databases are non-relational, and as a company, we are planning to move to NoSQL or open-source databases. It would be good if we are able to install and use Pega on a NoSQL database. They can also try to tailor or organize the company a bit differently and go more towards the microservice concept. I would like Pega to develop machine learning and intelligent AI algorithms. They have a good foundation in terms of the model and the stuff that we are using for some customers, and it will be good to onboard as many machine learning algorithms as possible."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Fastens application development and has all the features to meet the requirements of our customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Unqork is most compared with Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.