Unqork Reviews

In Unqork, I worked in different industries including insurance, banking sectors, pharmacy trials, and real estate. Currently, I am working on a financial investment project. Throughout these six projects in Unqork, we used it to integrate different systems, store databases, create workflows, case use cases workflows, and dynamic UIs, dashboards. We used almost all areas such as services and APIs, with most of them using data workflows where we manipulated data as per our requirements.

When I started working in Unqork, it was just entering the market. This is why we did not have proper predefined use cases in Unqork, and even now they are not fully available, only small snippets. We used these snippets, and from academic training and boot camp, we started developing small POCs before joining real-time projects. We developed cases based on experience and learned extensively. Based on our experiences, Unqork has also evolved significantly. Since 2021, there have been numerous changes in Unqork, including the designer portal, canvas, securities, and other features. We have implemented all new functionalities and features delivered by Unqork in quarterly patches.

Currently, I am working with a client where there is an agreement between the client and Unqork itself. Unqork provides software to the client under this agreement, and simultaneously, the Unqork product team uses this client environment as an early access environment. We are maintaining six projects - three completed and three in progress. They conduct experiments on live servers where applications are being used by different region users. The version I am using (71680) is not yet available in the market, as we have early access approximately six to seven months ahead.

Unqork provides everything by default as a tool. In the admin portal, we can configure everything related to module management, API management, roles, and groups immediately. We can maintain and manage services, databases, and almost everything in a single portal and tool. This is what I appreciate about Unqork. The platform has plugins, data workflows, and components, which we use extensively when approaching technical aspects.

The drag-and-drop functionalities in Unqork's developer portal are comprehensive. In the Unqork canvas, all components such as notepads, text areas, text fields, radio buttons, checkboxes, and drop-downs are provided without requiring code. Unqork provides default styling options, and if a project requires additional styling, it only needs minimal customization. Configurators do not need to write code for simple predefined elements in Unqork. This feature is similar to Pega, which I worked with in the past, but Unqork appears more advanced.

There are numerous areas for improvement in Unqork. For example, while they are replacing view grid with Vega grid, the Vega grid lacks certain features available in the view grid. In the view grid, we can have buttons against each row and events against each row event, which is not available in Vega grid.

Case management functionality is not currently available. Regarding versioning, while it is available to the market, it is not optimal. If versioning is deployed on any application, rolling back is not possible. When multiple people work on the same module in different versions or branches, merging can overwrite changes. The merging technology needs improvement in Unqork.

Connecting to the database is straightforward, but querying MongoDB and getting results requires additional effort. Case management is still unavailable to the general market. We attempted to implement it but had to step back as it did not meet all business functionalities. The Vega versioning also presents development challenges despite business interest.

I received training in Unqork during the last quarter of 2020. I have over 4 years of experience in Unqork since 2021, and I am currently working on Unqork projects.

I have not personally encountered deployment issues, though some colleagues have faced challenges specific to their design style. Upon reviewing their code within my company, I found that these issues could be resolved through enhanced codes and configurations.

Regarding scalability, performance shows some lag when retrieving data, loading styling, and loading pages. The speed and performance when connecting with different systems can be improved. I reported these concerns to the product team during one-on-one calls with the Unqork product team.

On a scale, scalability rates at 8 or 8.5, with room for improvement of 1 to 1.5 points. The platform still needs to incorporate AI, voice technology, and service request technology. For customer care applications, call integration directly into the application rather than phone systems would be beneficial.

Unqork support is very effective. All requests raised have been addressed or received timely responses. The Unqork community portal and academy provide extensive information, with 60 to 70% of required information readily available. For additional inquiries, service requests receive prompt responses.

Positive

Anyone, including freshers, can learn and start practicing in Unqork. I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.

Unqork includes multiple tools within its UDLC toolkit portal. It provides a release management application where users can select modules, data collections, applications, and workflows for promotion. The promotion process is straightforward and easy to learn.

Infosys, my current company, provides support and development for Unqork. Some companies partner directly with Unqork for product-related support. When product issues arise, service requests can be handled either by direct Unqork team members or partner companies.

In Unqork terminology, the term 'configurator' is used instead of 'developer'. Configurators do not need to write code for predefined elements in Unqork. While this feature is similar to Pega, Unqork offers more advanced capabilities.

[Answer to 'Which deployment model are you using for this solution?' from the text]

[Answer to 'If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?' from the text]

I mostly work with Unqork to develop internal applications, and right now, I'm working with JPMorgan in a department called Asset Wealth Management. We try to automate processes that were previously done manually through emails, SharePoint, and Excel, which can be error-prone and time-consuming. We aim to serve internal employees rather than client-facing applications.

Only one application I have developed is client-facing, but the traffic for that application is very low.

With Unqork, you can develop user interfaces easily, and it's mostly beneficial for developers and firms rather than at the client level. The drag-and-drop feature makes it very easy and fast to develop, which drastically reduces costs compared to regular coding technologies that require database purchases and maintenance. With Unqork, everything comes in a package, so there's no need to worry about databases, provided your firm is okay with the security standards they follow.

Unqork makes data integration very easy, especially in how you make API calls and retrieve data from external APIs. They simplify the process to the point where even a business person can learn to integrate with other systems using the integration system in the administration tab. As a business person, I just need to use the applications and integrations already provided in Unqork.

The areas of Unqork that need improvement include the UI, as data-driven applications in banks require displaying data effectively on forms and dashboards. When working with JPMorgan, the data structures stored in APIs present challenges in retrieving and displaying data. It is tough to understand the data workflows in Unqork and manipulate them, especially for someone without experience. The functionality for data manipulation is not straightforward, and the transforms component requires additional coding, which complicates API responsiveness and impacts user experience due to latency issues.

I have been using Unqork for nearly more than 1 1/2 years, with a break in between. Before this, I used it for 8 months, and now again, I am using the tool for around 6-7 months.

I would rate Unqork's stability as an 8, because whatever they promise is consistent and reliable until production. I do not see any instabilities regarding the features they promised.

I rate Unqork's scalability as a 3 or 4; it is not highly scalable. For applications facing around 1 lakh customers, it's better to avoid using Unqork due to significant data latency issues and limited control over optimizations for API calls.

I would rate the technical support for Unqork as a 9. We have a community where we can ask questions and usually receive support within 3-4 hours from other developers who can assist us.

Positive

I have worked with Core AI, another low-code platform, recently, about 3 months ago, alongside Unqork.

I would rate my experience with the initial setup of Unqork as a 10, because it is a cloud-based application. You can directly access it via any browser by entering the URL and land in the development environment without needing to download or set anything up.

Unqork is assisting with AI-driven projects for my customers through Gen AI developments, but to be frank, I have never used that technology with AI. They are developing it, but it's not fully complete or widely used yet. We typically use our in-house AI to integrate by making API calls and then sending and receiving data.

As of now, with Persistent, I had one customer for whom we developed two applications, but unfortunately, they are not using either due to performance issues. This dates back to around 2021.

Now, I'm working with JPMorgan, where we have multiple in-house applications that everyone is using because they are not complex applications. We're using Unqork for systems such as ticketing, but I am also working on a more complex application that is still in the development phase.

I rate the pricing for Unqork as a 7. They should consider making their pricing more flexible, particularly for small applications where customers may only want to test if it works before committing further. In those cases, they shouldn't charge as much as they do for standard applications.

For JPMorgan, we have the license for approximately 2-3 crores per year, but I am not 100% sure since I haven't been involved in enterprise meetings for first-hand information.

Overall, I would rate Unqork 6.5 to 7 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Other

I brought Unqork into my organization primarily as a self-service tool or as a tool for allowing developers and operations teams to build quick UIs. A lot of our client experiences, self-service experiences, form applications, and similar applications are built on the Unqork platform.

The feature of being able to stand a UI with minimal effort and a very quick turnaround is valuable. It allows for easy editing and rapid release to the higher environment without much hassle of processes. The tool does not require heavy management of infrastructure like servers. It is well packaged and sleek, enabling fast changes. The velocity with which I can convert a POC into an implementation or even come up with a POC or an idea is much faster with Unqork.

Unqork is not an extremely mature solution. Many things that I worked with them on were functionally basic but missing from the platform. The product lacks the maturity of a more established product, like Appian, which is more of an industry standard. Some basic functionalities were missing, such as version control, which was only introduced recently. There is some degree of inconvenience and maneuverability issues. The product is not an ideal choice for all of a big organization’s tools.

I have been using Unqork for more than almost four years, around three and a half to four years.

There have been no significant stability issues where the entire platform went down. However, as a SaaS platform, they release enhancements regularly, which can occasionally disrupt existing functionalities. This is a general issue with SaaS providers and not unique to Unqork. Despite this, I would still rate the stability of the solution highly.

The solution is scalable, largely dependent on how the SaaS environment is sized and the contract. I have never encountered an issue with scalability in our setup.

The support is good with decent coverage. It is a paid service, and the level of support corresponds to what I pay for. They are decent and responsive, but the prioritization of requests could improve. The support team's quality can vary, with some resources more efficient than others. Overall, I would rate the service around eight or nine.

Positive

I do not need to handle the initial setup as they offer SaaS offerings, which include multi-tenant deployment. This means there is no need for complex initial setups from the user's end.

I can negotiate good deals with Unqork. While it is difficult to compare value propositions directly, I do not consider it overpriced. In my experience, it seemed somewhat underpriced, possibly due to being an early adopter. Overall, it is reasonably priced in its competitive segment.

I am very intimately familiar with the cost pricing of Appian.

I would recommend Unqork but emphasize setting clear expectations on what it can accomplish. It is not a silver bullet for all UI automation needs. I need to be sure about my use cases before using Unqork, as not everything UI-related can be done with it. Overall, I would rate Unqork an eight.

Public Cloud

Other

I was using Unqork for a fintech company where we were building their system, like from the home page, to the login page, and then back to the home page. It streamlined operations, especially in connecting to databases and handling frontend security concerns without writing code.

Unqork's no-code platform supports Platform as a Service. It includes built-in templates and systems, providing a fast service that allows a single person to handle tasks that would otherwise require several developers. The system's inherent security and ease of use in creating cloud solutions without code greatly enhance efficiency. It runs on the cloud base, fully leveraging partnerships with AWS, and supports temporary databases for testing. The platform drastically minimizes the lines of code required, significantly speeding up the development cycle.

Utilizing Unqork's system for global libraries could enhance efficiency. Currently, developers create separate libraries, which complicates understanding and use. Additionally, integrating Unqork with some third-party systems, like Salesforce, is difficult. Improvements in these areas could greatly enhance its usability.

I have been using Unqork for around two years.

In terms of setup, once an account is registered with Unqork, it becomes easy to use. It does not require significant maintenance. Even a new developer can handle client setups.

Unqork offers good security compliance with standards like SOC2 and HIPAA. However, there were some difficulties integrating it with ServiceNow and Salesforce. Connection with legacy systems and third-party APIs is generally easy.

Unqork is fully cloud-based and can utilize services from AWS, ensuring data availability across different databases. Healthcare and fintech industries are beginning to recognize its efficacy. Its cloud infrastructure simplifies global access to data and services without the fear of losing data.

When I had questions or encountered issues, support usually resolved them within 24 hours. I would rate the technical support at eight out of ten.

Positive

Besides Unqork, I have used Appian, Outsystems, and Mendix.

The initial setup requires just an account registration. If the organization is registered, it simplifies the process significantly.

A team of four to five developers, alongside a manager, worked with Unqork on the projects.

In terms of ROI, while specific numbers are not provided, two to three projects saw a twenty to thirty percent reduction in workload, indicating a profitable pricing structure.

Specific details on pricing and licensing are unknown, but buying licenses for multiple teams can become costly.

In the no-code space, I have used and evaluated Outsystems and Mendix.

Overall, I would rate Unqork an eight out of ten. It's a promising new technology, and while gaining expertise in it can be challenging due to its novelty, it offers great opportunities for those willing to take the plunge. The goal should be to simplify processes further and encourage experienced professionals in Unqork. I rate the overall solution eight out of ten.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

We use Unqork for dashboard creation and management of customer data. Our projects involve form submissions where the customer fills out forms. Once submitted, these forms go to an approvers' team. Upon approval, requests are sent to banking for confirmation, after which funds are released. This entire process is dependent on the insurance company, creating an end-to-end workflow that begins with an insurance request ID, followed by approvals, banking detail submissions, and sometimes dependencies on Kiribati bank accounts.

The loading speed is very slow. Page responses are also unsatisfactory; when margins are added and components are shifted left or right, they do not respond properly, causing overflowing issues on the website.

The most valuable features of Unqork are its operating components, especially the decision components and HTML components. Unqork allows me to write HTML code, use JavaScript, Angular, and React, which significantly enhances its flexibility. Specifically, asynchronous processes, visualizers, secondary fields, and the data and events components stand out. The HTML component's drag-and-drop functionality to include external code is highly appreciated.

The table design needs improvement to allow developers to manually change the table's appearance, such as its colors. Challenges arose in the last project when I required each table row to have a different color. Unqork's default does not support this, resulting in me decoding Angular code to include these features. Allowing more flexibility in UI customization would be beneficial.

I have been working with Unqork for one year.

The deployment process for Unqork is very efficient. Deploying a module takes about one to two minutes. It involves selecting the module from a dropdown in the backend, which shows all created modules. It's user-friendly and I encountered no issues.

I rate the stability of Unqork at seven. While the system is generally stable, sometimes components can change overnight with no clear explanation. A component's previously set value might be missing the next day, affecting reliability. This instability can disrupt my progress.

I rate the scalability as six or seven. Unqork's ability to adapt depends on the customer's requirements. Not every project can be executed through Unqork as some complex requirements might need proof of concept before proceeding. If Unqork cannot support a requirement, the customer must adjust their expectations.

I would rate Unqork's technical support as nine. They were able to resolve most issues in the past, however, there were instances when support could not solve a problem and suggested raising it to higher management. Overall, they usually help resolve issues effectively.

Positive

The initial setup of Unqork is straightforward and very easy, earning it a ten out of ten. I faced no challenges during the installation process.

Unqork is somewhat expensive. The certification costs are particularly high, around 16,000 Indian Rupees. While some companies cover certification fees for their employees, others do not, making it a considerable expense for individuals. If certification could be priced lower, it would be more affordable.

Overall, I rate Unqork as eight out of ten. I recommend improving the table design to allow more manual customization for developers. For some projects, I faced limitations in fulfilling the customer's requirements within Unqork and had to compromise by working within its constraints.

Public Cloud

Other

I work for an organization called Nuveen, an asset management company in financial services. We use Unqork for building a lot of internal workflows, primarily small-scale one-to-two page applications for various uses in our client services, operations, and middle office. Most of the applications are primarily slackers, which means if somebody does something, it goes to a workflow, needs approval, and goes through. We use workflow and case management type applications, and this is what we've been using for the past two years.

From a capability point of view, there is very little infrastructure setup required compared to similar SaaS applications. I have built on Salesforce power platform and have experience with other applications, and Unqork is very comparable. Unqork offers two major advantages. It is a single-tenant application versus multi-tenant applications, which makes our security team more comfortable using it for processing confidential data. Additionally, the ease of use, especially in building form-type applications and workflows, is excellent.

The drag and drop functionality works well for basic form structures, but customization of complex layouts is challenging. If I have five to ten widgets on a screen and need to customize them, the work involved is substantial. Without proper guidance, one might create a clunky and difficult-to-use system from a developer's perspective. Simple page forms are fine, but more complex layouts could benefit from a layout manager or similar tool. As for architecture changes, Unqork moved from the Sanctuary to Vega platform without providing a migration tool, necessitating manual updates.

I have been using Unqork since about 2022, so it has been roughly two years and a couple of months.

The deployment process is straightforward. Although the initial setup took some effort, building applications and deploying changes is efficient. I have rarely encountered deployment issues, except for minor ones due to configuration errors or change control problems.

The platform has been reasonably stable, with availability issues only occurring twice due to underlying AWS infrastructure problems. From the stability point of view, I would rate it a nine.

I rate the scalability a seven. We increased the volumes, and over two years, I only encountered an issue once when there was some slow movement due to misconfigured elements.

The support and service from Unqork have been very good. We have premium support as part of our organization's licensing, and I have almost never had an issue where I needed to escalate due to inadequate support.

Positive

I have built applications on Salesforce power platform and have experience with other applications.

The initial setup was a bit involved, but once we started building applications, the deployment process became straightforward.

Unqork is expensive compared to other platforms we use, which are of different scales. Pricing is custom, depending on the type of organization. However, I would say the solution offers good value for money due to its capabilities.

I would recommend Unqork but advise potential users to evaluate their needs carefully. It is ideal for building single-page applications that scale independently. However, it should not replace analytical tools. Identify the right use cases and utilize it effectively. Overall, I would rate Unqork a six due to the fact they haven’t yet built tools for architecture changes, requiring manual updates.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

We are working for a leading insurer in America. The purpose of the application is to validate whether the user is eligible for the insurance, including coverage details and underwriting screens. Unqork is efficient in collecting information through various channels and APIs. It populates the data based on sign-in types, such as direct login or SSO login, and then redirects users to underwriting screens. The system validates user eligibility and sends updates to another channel, like an AWS system, which decides the user's eligibility or application processing status.

The integration of API components is valuable. We use a component called a plugin in Unqork, which fetches data from any schema, whether external or internal. Recent updates allow direct data fetching from local databases, enhancing flexibility without needing microservices. Unqork optimizes the process of storing and fetching data through plugins, making it easy compared to other products and enhancing productivity.

Unqork is not efficient for building e-commerce sites where the user interface is more dominant than the data. While it handles backend functionalities well, user interface-focused applications like multiple complex dashboards face limitations. These areas need improvements in Unqork.

I have been working with Unqork for almost two years now.

The deployment process is straightforward with Unqork. From staging to QA, we have a service administration tool to visualize which modules need promotion. It is a matter of one click to deploy, making it efficient.

Unqork is stable. In our experience, there have been no major production issues due to Unqork in the 1.5 years it has been in production. While minor bugs occasionally occur, they are not significant, and the platform remains reliable.

If considering scalable functionalities, Unqork rates eight out of ten. However, when managing exceptionally large data volumes, the architecture might require adjustments, making it about six and a half to seven out of ten.

The interaction with Unqork's technical support lacks efficiency in terms of speedy responses. We generally communicate through a single point of contact linked to our client's license, and there is room for improvement in the promptness of addressing issues.

Neutral

Unqork is the first no-code platform I am using. Though I am familiar with another platform called OutSystems, Unqork is more efficient as it is a no-code platform, which eliminates the need for traditional coding.

The initial setup can be challenging for those new to low code methods. Transitioning from traditional coding in Python or Java to a no-code platform like Unqork can be difficult initially but becomes easier once you understand the scenarios for use.

Deployment can be handled by one person, however, the number of people required for maintenance depends on the application's scope. Two to three knowledgeable individuals are sufficient for managing maintenance.

I am not certain about the annual licensing cost, but it is somewhat on the pricier side. It's justified if all features of Unqork are fully utilized.

As far as I know, my colleagues are using OutSystems, but I find Unqork offers a more efficient way to build applications without needing to write any code.

If you're leveraging all of Unqork's functionalities and features fully, the investment is worthwhile. My overall rating for Unqork is seven out of ten. Efficiency in using no-code features makes it a good fit when fully utilized.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Initially, I started working with Unqork for our real estate clients, creating a platform where users can list, sell, and rent properties. The platform was interactive, allowing clients and consumers to engage in property transactions. I also worked on a digital onboarding platform for Transamerica to simplify the onboarding process of clients for retirement plans and fund management. The goal was to convert traditional, lengthy processes into quick, digital ones.

Unqork has helped reduce the time complexity and development time significantly. Tasks that traditionally took two days can be accomplished in four hours with Unqork, thus saving time and money.

Unqork is a low-code, no-code platform that provides pre-built functionalities, allowing quick development by just dragging and dropping components. It supports both front-end and back-end development, being cloud-based, offering flexibility in usage. I can use Unqork for front-end, back-end, or both, enabling seamless integration with existing systems. Unqork sets up development, QA, UAT, and production environments in the cloud, facilitating easier testing and deployment. Improvements over time include features like version control which have enhanced its functionality significantly. Though there were issues initially with features like branching, Unqork has been improving day by day.

Although Unqork has made improvements in development view, I suggest focusing on data handling and integration performance, especially with higher data volumes. This includes making platforms smoother for high data volume handling. Another area I would like to see enhancements is regarding sophisticated development UI; more focus should be on performing optimally than having a sophisticated developer UI.

I have been working with Unqork for more than three years.

Unqork is generally stable and reliable when following the best practices and recommendations provided by Unqork's documentation. Issues arise when developers do not adhere to recommended guidelines, leading to performance degradation.

Unqork benefits business projects by speeding up development time. However, when developing large platforms with significant traffic, there are scalability challenges, which might affect performance.

Unqork's technical support is efficient, allowing users to create tickets directly within their environment. I have had positive experiences where issues were addressed promptly within 48 hours.

Positive

I have not worked with other low-code, no-code solutions before using Unqork.

Initial setup is straightforward as Unqork is cloud-based. Clients receive all the necessary credentials and rights, making it easy for users to log in and start development.

The simplicity of Unqork's setup allows for easy user management and permissions configuration.

The platform offers a mid-range pricing model, similar to other solutions in the market, leading to reasonable cost savings and ROI.

My knowledge is limited to Unqork’s certification pricing; I am not aware of specific platform pricing.

I explored another platform called Decisions but found Unqork to be simpler and more understandable.

I recommend Unqork for internal platforms and domains like insurance with manageable traffic. However, I am cautious about recommending it for public platforms with high traffic until improvements in handling large data volumes are made. I rate Unqork as an eight out of ten for its overall functionality. Overall, I rate the product eight out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

Our primary use case for Unqork is a medical, hospital-based application where users can book appointments with providers, schedule or reschedule appointments, check provider availability, and check the distance from the patient's location to the provider's location. It also allows users to book virtual visits, which means appointments can be made for online consultations. These facilities are all available within our system.

Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year. This feature improves performance by loading only the required page on demand instead of loading the entire content page. This dynamic refresh significantly enhances performance. Additionally, the integration capabilities are robust, with administrator features like API parameters and TLS security ensuring secure data transfer. Unqork’s seamless upgrade system ensures bug-free production environments.

Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature. Additionally, performance on the no-code platform needs enhancement to match the speed of coding websites, as the initial load time could be optimized.

I have been using Unqork for more than three years.

The deployment process for Unqork is straightforward, as it is a cloud-based application. Configuration is done through their interface, and once published, it automatically deploys to Staging. The process from Staging to QA requires selecting and promoting modules, which is easy via Unqork's interface.

I rate Unqork's stability as an eight out of ten. There are some restrictions, and as a new platform, it lacks external community support that other platforms have.

I rate Unqork's scalability as eight out of ten. Unqork consistently works in the background, releasing new components, and provides comprehensive documentation. The community support is excellent, with quick response times to queries.

The technical support from Unqork is rated as eight out of ten. Sometimes, they struggle to understand our exact queries and may categorize critical issues as lower priority.

Positive

Before Unqork, I was involved with Java tools for coding and SQL databases. Unqork's no-code platform eliminates the need for extensive database management by using MongoDB internally.

The initial setup of Unqork is rated seven out of ten. Some restrictions and dependencies on Unqork exist, particularly in mobile applications and customization, which can be challenging.

Approximately ten people were involved in the development of Unqork, but only three handled the deployment. Each person managed different stages of deployment: Staging to QA, QA to UAT, and UAT to Production.

Before choosing Unqork, we evaluated other options. However, the ability to release a full application rapidly with Unqork was a key factor. They also provided a dedicated point of contact for any issues.

I would rate Unqork an eight out of ten overall. I deducted points due to the lack of mobile application development and certain customization restrictions.

Public Cloud

Other

Mostly we build finance applications and insurance and finance. These days we stick to finance rather than insurance. In the beginning, we used to build insurance applications as well. That is all from the past experience I have.

What I appreciate best about Unqork is the dynamic refresh feature. It refreshes the modules or whatever data dynamically. We can complete applications faster compared to other platforms such as Pega, Appian, or others. That is what I hear and what I have seen also. That is the biggest achievement we can accomplish using Unqork. I'm not criticizing other technologies but we can achieve results faster compared to other technologies. The security level is also good. The drag and drop functionality in Unqork is very nice actually. When compared with other technologies or BPM technologies, it performs well. There is no need for technical experience or coding knowledge to work with Unqork. Users can easily learn from the documentation, debug, and develop.

I might have faced a problem with scalability. They are implementing a new version, which is not so good according to what I have heard from other configurers from other companies. Rather than moving to other versions, they should enhance the performance.

I have been using Unqork for more than three and a half years, approximately 3.6 years.

Sometimes we encounter issues, but not frequently. Unqork is very reliable most of the time, with rare exceptions. We have experienced issues that can be resolved within three to five days because they deploy developments monthly. Due to that reason, it might affect performance or technical aspects, but they can resolve it. From a data breach perspective, it does not get affected. Only the performance aspect gets affected. For stability, I would rate it a nine.

My impressions of the scalability of Unqork are positive regarding the development of code and configuration. The workflow method and the module-based methods are good features.

The support in terms of tickets we raise is good, but if there is an issue or breakdown in the environment, it takes some time for them to resolve the issue. Otherwise, they have a good supporting team.

Positive

Regarding the initial setup, I find it straightforward. We just need to connect with their team and ask for devops-related requirements. They can install it and implement things according to the company's needs.

Anyone can use Unqork. Every month, there is a new improvement in performance, component enhancement, new components, technical aspects, features, and security. The only observation about Unqork technology is that initially they provide basic devops services. If you want to increase the service for performance, we need to raise a request. There are basic, primary, secondary, and enterprise versions. Based on the investment in Unqork servers, the response time varies. For their support, I would rate them between seven to eight. I would recommend this product to other people. My advice is that if organizations want low cost with good features and good productivity, they can use this technology. Overall, I rate Unqork a nine out of ten.