Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Perforce and Ranorex are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #37, while Ranorex is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Perforce holds a 0.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Ranorex’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

107 Views
71 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,134 Views
1,588 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Ranorex Studio and Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL compete in the software testing market. Ranorex Studio seems to have the upper hand due to its ongoing development and feature integration compared to Perforce QA Wizard Pro's EOL status.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers comprehensive test automation features, compatibility with various application technologies, and seamless integration with CI/CD tools. In contrast, Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL is known for effective script automation, a strong debugger, and traditional robustness, yet lacks recent updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio supports efficient deployment with detailed documentation and proactive customer service. Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL follows a more traditional installation process, with limited customer service due to its EOL status, impacting support levels.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio requires a higher initial investment but provides greater ROI through advanced features and regular updates. Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL might have lower initial costs but offers reduced ROI due to limited support and advancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at Intel Corporation

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"Object identification is good."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 8% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

March 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Overview

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.