Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Polaris Software Integrity ...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (18th), Static Code Analysis (15th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (13th)
SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Polaris Software Integrity Platform is designed for Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud), on the other hand, focuses on Static Application Security Testing (SAST), holds 6.8% mindshare, up 6.3% since last year.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Polaris Software Integrity Platform?
Share your opinion
Diego Moreo - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 7, 2024
Enhanced code quality with data consolidation needs and good pipeline integration
We have SonarCloud integrated into our pipeline. It is used as a tool for checking code quality, clean code, bugs, and security issues. It acts as a quality gate for production, helping decide if our code can be applied SonarCloud aids us in checking major issues in legacy systems and helps…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."
"Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost."
"I am using the free version of the solution."
"The current pricing is quite cheap."
"While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."
"I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SonarCloud?
Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonarCloud?
Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost.
What needs improvement with SonarCloud?
Reporting features are missing in SonarCloud. We do not have a way to consolidate data within the tool, requiring us to extract data and use Power BI for reports.
 

Learn More

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Veracode, Snyk and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: October 2024.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.