Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Polaris Software Integrity ...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (18th), Static Code Analysis (15th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (13th)
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Polaris Software Integrity Platform is designed for Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 26.7% mindshare, down 27.7% since last year.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Polaris Software Integrity Platform?
Share your opinion
Wang Dayong - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2023
Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages
We use the product to review our software codes. We have integrated the product to review our new delivery code When we deliver a code, the solution scans the code and reports whether the code has bugs or any other vulnerability issues. Thus the solution helps us identify issues and improve the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's an open-source product."
"We're using their free Community Edition version."
"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."
"We are using the free, unlicensed version."
"We are using the community version of the solution and we plan on purchasing licenses for the upgraded version soon. There is a limitation on how many lines of code can be scanned and this is why we are going to purchase a license for an increased amount."
"This solution is free."
"We pay €10 per month for this solution, which is good. It provides a good value for money."
"I am satisfied with the pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Sonar
 

Learn More

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Veracode, Snyk and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: October 2024.
814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.