Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Signavio Process Intell...
Ranking in Process Mining
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is 13.4%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
Venkat Sivaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable and stable tool that needs to provide its users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen
Certain areas that provide users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen are available in Silico but not in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement. The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs. I wish the future releases of the product possess the aforementioned capabilities since only Silico has such capabilities right now, while Signavio and Celonis fail to offer Silico's capabilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"One of the most valuable things about process intelligence is that it allows you to mine data over a long period of time, such as one or two years. This gives us a deep understanding of how your processes actually work."
"Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency."
"The product's best feature is the connection and integration between all of the capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"Being able to deploy in shorter cuts."
"The product helps us build solid business use cases."
"By clearly defining process owners, customers can not only better achieve their goals but are always accountable to partners and audits."
"Everything is valuable. If you're looking at the process documentation feature, it's really easy to use. We have official training from Signavio trainers, but sometimes I do the training myself very shortly for our colleagues. In less than one or two hours, they are already able to model the business process themselves. The language is really easy. The user interface is really easy. If you're talking about process simulation, we have customers and clients internally who are using it a lot, because they are from logistics or operations. They have numbers and KPIs behind the process. They know their numbers, so they have to see how they can improve a given business processes with a change in the task sequence or a change in the numbers of KPIs. If you're talking about the process mining, it is integrated into the whole solution."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs."
"The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use."
"It should be able to convert business workflows into media documents quickly."
"The UI could be improved."
"SAP Signavio Process Intelligence slows down when you feed a lot of data. It needs to improve its processing ability. The tool should also incorporate AI features that can automate things. Many of the competitors have this feature."
"The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs."
"The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey modeling feature."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"The costs of the solution require transparency since sometimes it refers to the number of users and sometimes the amount of volume that is used"
"The pricing is expensive."
"It is a fairly expensive solution."
"I would not say the product was terribly expensive but I would not say it was cheap either."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
University
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The product helps us build solid business use cases.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is expensive but lesser than SolarWinds. It comes with free SAP licenses.
What needs improvement with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use.
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
NBN, T-System, Transurban, Audi BKK, Taifun, Met Office, Esquel Group, Sivantos, Consensus, Sirona
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.