Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Signavio Process Intell...
Ranking in Process Mining
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 18.9%, up from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is 6.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

AntonioCardone - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables a data-driven approach to process analysis and helps generate cost savings
This tool allows me to discover value before discussing technology. It's the first solution that combines business competence and capabilities with technological capabilities. With Celonis, I discuss processes and root causes, analyzing the bottleneck resource process. There is an app centered around a data-driven approach. I can create the model and, in a data-driven way, map processes using technology that supports people in investigative activities by finding root causes where processes falter. Celonis emphasizes that these goals aim to generate cost optimization.
TigerPillay - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive understanding and efficiency of operational processes
Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency The most valuable features are Process Manager and Process Governance functionalities. The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the automatic mapping of the processes themselves to be a valuable feature."
"We use the tool for supply chain transformation. The tool has helped us find the bottlenecks in the supply chain like where the delay occurred in delivery, payment, etc. We had to extract two years' of data from the SAP system and an internal tool. We fed the data into Celonis and it created a process map for us with hundreds of variations. It has helped us see where exactly the bottleneck was. The tool has also helped us generate a lot of reviews and KPIs. It has helped us to find the problem and the remedy through process optimization."
"In my opinion, it's quite an advanced tool."
"It performs well for connecting multiple processes."
"The real-time replication was just implemented and is quite useful."
"It provides seamless unified views with awesome drill down options."
"We can observe the flow and invoices."
"It's the first solution that combines business competence and capabilities with technological capabilities."
"The product's best feature is the connection and integration between all of the capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"The initial setup was simple. One can know how exactly the process performs just by clicking a few buttons."
"The product helps us build solid business use cases."
"Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency."
"One of the most valuable things about process intelligence is that it allows you to mine data over a long period of time, such as one or two years. This gives us a deep understanding of how your processes actually work."
"I like the tool's ability to visualize the entire process flow, how the process flow flows, and what deviations happen from the process flow. It also helps to figure out the process bottlenecks."
"Everything is valuable. If you're looking at the process documentation feature, it's really easy to use. We have official training from Signavio trainers, but sometimes I do the training myself very shortly for our colleagues. In less than one or two hours, they are already able to model the business process themselves. The language is really easy. The user interface is really easy. If you're talking about process simulation, we have customers and clients internally who are using it a lot, because they are from logistics or operations. They have numbers and KPIs behind the process. They know their numbers, so they have to see how they can improve a given business processes with a change in the task sequence or a change in the numbers of KPIs. If you're talking about the process mining, it is integrated into the whole solution."
 

Cons

"Celonis needs to improve the feature channel. They should incorporate more generative AI elements into their solution."
"Celonis could improve by expanding its use beyond finance areas into infrastructure domains, such as networks and server utilization."
"It would help if they had more integrations and automation features."
"Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems."
"I would really appreciate it if Celonis had significant compatibility with robotic process automation solutions. Once they define the process and understand it, streamline it, optimize it, and take inputs around it. When they reconfigure the process, there should be good compatibility with any of the automation tools, wherein I can integrate for robotic process automation, where I can streamline many of these processes on the application itself. Today, I need to extract this process and reload it into other tools, like UiPath, to integrate them with Automation Anywhere. If this tool can provide that efficiency, that would be great. I'm a data analytics guy. I lead a data analytics team. So technically, I would primarily look at if this can give me a visualization opportunity and integrate that in terms of the data."
"It should be more flexible. It is not particularly flexible in the way it works, and it is quite rigid. It has some very strong structures that you have to follow. It could certainly be made more user-friendly to understand and should have fewer requirements for manipulation of the data to create the visualizations. We should also get better support from Celonis, and they also need to make the licensing model slightly different."
"The price is high for us."
"The cost could be improved."
"The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs."
"The challenge for a solution that utilizes modeling notations, is that the look and feel of the models (e.g. in BPMN) is pre-defined."
"Interface could be more user friendly."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
"The UI could be improved."
"I would like to see a better version of the solution."
"The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use."
"It could be more scalable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Celonis is cost-effective."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The solution’s pricing is high when compared to other process mining tools."
"Celonis has the highest pricing in the process mining domain."
"Celonis offers free learning possibilities. I am using the free version of Celonis."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"I rate Celonis' pricing a ten out of ten because it is expensive."
"The product is pretty expensive but reasonable."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is expensive."
"It is a fairly expensive solution."
"The costs of the solution require transparency since sometimes it refers to the number of users and sometimes the amount of volume that is used"
"I would not say the product was terribly expensive but I would not say it was cheap either."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
15%
University
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What do you like most about Celonis?
Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
I think it's relatively expensive, but it's also good. It's a good product, albeit on the expensive side.
What do you like most about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The product helps us build solid business use cases.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is expensive but lesser than SolarWinds. It comes with free SAP licenses.
What needs improvement with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
NBN, T-System, Transurban, Audi BKK, Taifun, Met Office, Esquel Group, Sivantos, Consensus, Sirona
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.