Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessDesigner vs Visual Paradigm comparison

QPR Software and Visual Paradigm are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. QPR Software is ranked #25, while Visual Paradigm is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8. QPR Software holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPD, compared to Visual Paradigm’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of QPR Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Visual Paradigm users who would recommend it.
QPR ProcessDesigner
Read 2 QPR ProcessDesigner reviews
  • 196 Views
  • 135 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Visual Paradigm
Read 27 Visual Paradigm reviews
  • 4,112 Views
  • 2,934 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

QPR ProcessDesigner and Visual Paradigm are tools in the business process management and modeling category. QPR ProcessDesigner has an advantage in pricing and support, while Visual Paradigm offers comprehensive features that justify the investment.

Features: QPR ProcessDesigner focuses on user-centric process mapping and optimization, facilitating workflow integration, and enhancing cost-value efficiency. Visual Paradigm provides diverse features such as UML modeling, agile development support, and broad modeling capabilities, catering to complex scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QPR ProcessDesigner offers straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, ensuring a smooth setup and ongoing assistance. Visual Paradigm, with slightly more complex deployment, offsets this with comprehensive guides and strong support channels, helping users navigate initial complexities.

Pricing and ROI: QPR ProcessDesigner presents competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with quicker ROI. Visual Paradigm, with potentially higher initial costs, justifies these with significant ROI due to its extensive features, offering value to those prioritizing a wide toolkit.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessDesigner
Ranking in Business Process Design
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Visual Paradigm
Ranking in Business Process Design
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessDesigner is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Paradigm is 6.4%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design
 

Featured Reviews

it_user211722 - PeerSpot reviewer
FactView was easy to use and integrate.
Process simulation Performance monitoring Business intelligence I was a consultant mainly at Standard Bank, I worked for the supplier of the QPR Suite. It was used mainly for balanced scorecard to track organisation performance, but also for process mapping and monitoring as part of their Six…
Read full review
Angie Ibrahim Eissa - PeerSpot reviewer
A software application designed for software development teams to model business information systems and manage development processes
Setting up Visual Paradigm is easy. There's hardly any configuration needed, unlike some other tools. You just choose your method and diagram type, and you're good to go. As for improvements, integrating project management features with diagrams could be better. Viewing outputs could also be smoother, especially when working with multiple files.Deployment is quick and painless. It practically takes no time at all to set up. And because I also teach at the university, I use Visual Paradigm for my classes and case studies. It's easy to switch between products, and my students have no trouble using it on their own.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"​Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"Visual Paradigm allowed me to create UML diagrams efficiently."
"Visual Paradigm is simple and easy to use."
"The application is easy to use and provides informative diagrams."
"Visual Paradigm is simple and easy to use."
"I like the structure. I can see the diagrams and everything I created."
"The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working."
"What I found most valuable in Visual Paradigm is diagramming. I had a great user experience as diagramming in the tool is easy and convenient, even for complex diagrams or models. Visual Paradigm is the perfect tool for me, and I prefer it over Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. Visual Paradigm is better for collaboration if you consider, for example, versioning, so this is another valuable tool feature that's simple and embedded in the solution. In Visual Paradigm, it's also easy to set up the project with team members and collaborate, and it's also a pro of the tool."
"The most valuable feature of the Visual Paradigm that I use is process modeling. Additionally, the solution has a complete set of features."
More Visual Paradigm pros
 

Cons

"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"There are some connectivity issues that crop up rarely when used with SQL Server."
"I would like to see something for visualizing innovation work maps."
"The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it."
"In terms of room for improvement in Visual Paradigm, I tried looking for one. I'm pleased with the tool, but it would be great if you could integrate Visual Paradigm with more tools. For example, when moving from Visual Paradigm to another tool, such as Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, the process could be improved a bit. Still, I wonder if it's not limited by the standards Visual Paradigm follows, such as XMI files. It could be connected to limitations related to the standards rather than a tool limitation. When you move projects from Visual Paradigm into Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect via XMI files, you lose all your notes from the elements, so this is an area for improvement in Visual Paradigm. TOGAF support is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Visual Paradigm. I'd also like the tool to have ArchiMate support. If both TOGAF and ArchiMate could be supported in Visual Paradigm and made part of a lower level of licensing or cheaper licensing models, that would be best for me."
"I was looking to generate code from the diagrams, but it was not totally clear how to do it."
"It's still early for me to comment since I've only been using it for two months, but the responsiveness when diagramming needs to be improved."
"From time to time, we experience some troubles when we work as teams."
"The solution could be more compatible with other products in the future."
More Visual Paradigm cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Visual Paradigm has two models available. One of them is the educational edition, and another is the business edition. For my personal usage, I use the educational version mostly. In a project, my customers have to purchase a license."
"I rate the pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Pricing for Visual Paradigm is a four out of five for me. I'm happy with its pricing."
"Compared to other solutions such as IBM Rational which is expensive, This solution is priced low."
"Visual Paradigm's pricing is not expensive."
"In terms of pricing, I find Visual Paradigm's subscription services reasonable, especially for the modern and standard editions. However, the premium products can be a bit pricey, especially considering our location in the Middle East. Currently, paying around a hundred dollars per user translates to almost six hundred Egyptian pounds, which can add up. For enterprise licensing, I think the perpetual license option could be more affordable. If it were cheaper, say around five hundred dollars, I would have invested in multiple perpetual licenses long ago. Sometimes, to manage costs, we share accounts among team members or switch access on and off for certain members who aren't actively working on projects. As for additional costs, there are charges for cloud services, which I'm considering because I've already exceeded the free capacity."
"I rate Visual Paradigm's pricing a five out of ten."
"You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription."
More Visual Paradigm pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Visual Paradigm?
The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Paradigm?
I purchased Visual Paradigm on my own, and it was competitively priced, so I was fine with the pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Paradigm?
The product can always get better as the industry changes, however, I didn't necessarily feel it was lacking for what I did with it.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 50% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs QPR ProcessDesigner
Compared 50% of the time
More QPR ProcessDesigner Competitors
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Visual Paradigm Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Visual Paradigm
Compared 36% of the time
Visio vs Visual Paradigm Logo
Visio vs Visual Paradigm
Compared 19% of the time
Lucidchart vs Visual Paradigm Logo
Lucidchart vs Visual Paradigm
Compared 16% of the time
Bizagi vs Visual Paradigm Logo
Bizagi vs Visual Paradigm
Compared 9% of the time
No Magic MagicDraw vs Visual Paradigm Logo
No Magic MagicDraw vs Visual Paradigm
Compared 6% of the time
More Visual Paradigm Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
March 2025
QPR ProcessDesigner reportDownload QPR ProcessDesigner product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Paradigm
March 2025
Visual Paradigm reportDownload Visual Paradigm product report
 

Also Known As

ProcessGuide, QPR Software ProcessGuide
No data available
 

Overview

Describe, analyze, communicate and improve your processes with QPR ProcessGuide, an all-inclusive multiuser process management software. QPR ProcessGuide helps your organization in their EBPA/BPA work by taking into consideration the needs of business users as well as IT experts.
QPR Software
Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.
Visual Paradigm
 

Sample Customers

ALPLA
Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota
Buyer's Guide
QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm
March 2025
Free Report: QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our QPR ProcessDesigner vs. Visual Paradigm report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.