Qualitia Automation Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Qualitia Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qualitia Software is ranked #33, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Qualitia Software holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qualitia Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Qualitia Automation Studio

Read 5 Qualitia Automation Studio reviews

209 Views
89 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 24 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,626 Views
1,579 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qualitia Automation Studio

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2025

Qualitia Automation Studio and UiPath Test Cloud compete in the automation testing landscape. UiPath Test Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set that many find worth the higher investment.

Features: Qualitia Automation Studio is known for codeless automation, quick adaptation, and intuitive use. It targets non-technical testers with simplicity and flexibility. UiPath Test Cloud offers strong integration capabilities, a robust cloud infrastructure, and supports scalable test environments, mainly appealing to enterprises needing detailed process automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualitia Automation Studio facilitates smoother deployment with a straightforward setup and is praised for efficient customer service and technical support. UiPath Test Cloud benefits from extensive documentation and a supportive community, aiding in managing its more demanding deployment needs.

Pricing and ROI: Qualitia Automation Studio is noted for lower setup costs and fast return on investment, making it suitable for budget-conscious teams. UiPath Test Cloud justifies a higher initial investment with long-term gains, offering in-depth analytics and enhanced operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Test Management Tools (7th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 5.0%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user189918

QA Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Good Tool for Non Technical Users.

I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.

Read full review

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement

UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"It is a very scalable product."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"Its price is a bit high."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Insurance Company

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Qualitia Automation Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Qualitia Automation Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

March 2025

Download Qualitia Automation Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.

Qualitia Software

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Free Report: Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualitia Automation Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.