Quest SharePlex vs SnapLogic comparison

Quest Software and SnapLogic are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Quest Software is ranked #49, while SnapLogic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Quest Software holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to SnapLogic’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SnapLogic users who would recommend it.

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,346 Views
806 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SnapLogic

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

2,461 Views
1,692 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

SnapLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Quest SharePlex and SnapLogic compete in data integration and management. Quest SharePlex excels in pricing and customer support, while SnapLogic is favored for its advanced features, making it ideal for those focusing on functionality.

Features: Quest SharePlex offers reliable data replication, data transformation, and efficient database management, ensuring data accuracy and integrity. SnapLogic provides a powerful integration platform with a low-code interface, extensive connectors, and cloud service integration, delivering flexibility and modern system connectivity.

Room for Improvement: Quest SharePlex could enhance its low-code functionalities, expand its connectors, and improve cloud integration options. SnapLogic can work on streamlining deployment processes, optimize its pricing model, and provide more responsive customer support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest SharePlex is noted for easy deployment with minimal configuration and excellent customer service. SnapLogic requires a more complex deployment setup due to its features but compensates with extensive documentation and a supportive user community.

Pricing and ROI: Quest SharePlex is budget-friendly with a lower initial setup cost, offering a quicker ROI for specific replication needs. SnapLogic, although higher in initial costs, demonstrates substantial ROI through its extensive features and integration capabilities, appealing to businesses requiring wide-ranging applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (15th), Cloud Data Integration (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Quest SharePlex is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

ManishJain7

Architect, Database Administration at Maximus

Excellent replication with good stability and very helpful support

I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training. Also, maybe if we could have a seperate section of showing out-of-sync tables in Foglight, instead of looking into the "warning" messages.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."

"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."

"I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."

"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy for new users to learn, it would be greatly beneficial."

"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"I am looking for more scheduling options. When it comes to scheduling, there are different tools in the market."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"I used the free trial."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"The pricing is okay."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 62% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

Fivetran vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

March 2025

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Buyer's Guide

SnapLogic

March 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

DataFlow

Overview

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Quest Software

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

SnapLogic

Sample Customers

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic

April 2025

Free Report: Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Quest SharePlex vs. SnapLogic report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.