Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QuickBase vs WaveMaker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
QuickBase support is efficient, communicative, and responsive, though complex issues may require extra payment, offering valuable technical assistance.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker's customer service is prompt, efficient, and professional, providing timely, knowledgeable assistance through various channels for a smooth experience.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.7
QuickBase users need faster enhancements, a modern UI, improved reporting, seamless integrations, better visualization, and more user-friendly operations.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker faces criticism for its documentation, app performance, learning curve, customer support, and limited customization options.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
QuickBase is scalable and reliable, supporting diverse roles and departments, with users rating its scalability between seven and nine.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker excels in scalability, handling heavy data volumes and large deployments, praised for robust performance and efficient resource management.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
QuickBase pricing is about $300 per license, with enterprise costs around $18,000/year for ten seats and additional data volume charges.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker provides flexible subscription plans with scalable, customizable pricing for varying business needs, including core features and support.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
QuickBase is praised for stability and reliability with minor performance issues, averaging user ratings between seven and ten.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker is praised for its stable and reliable performance, handling high workloads and stressful conditions with minimal issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.9
QuickBase provides no-code app creation, real-time updates, automation, SQL-like linking, and dynamic forms, enhancing efficiency for midsize companies.
No sentiment score available
WaveMaker excels with rapid development, drag-and-drop interface, pre-built templates, third-party integration, scalability, customization, and mobile/web support.
 

Categories and Ranking

QuickBase
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
16th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Employee Time Tracking Software (4th)
WaveMaker
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
32nd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
30th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of QuickBase is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WaveMaker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Daniel Ream - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable
I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.
it_user576294 - PeerSpot reviewer
This is a RAD tool to build business apps, tables, and forms.
It needs a desktop version for developers with license type CE. I would like to have the possibility to have a CE that lets me migrate from SQL Server Express, Access, and OpenOffice Base and keep all UI front-end development in just one system. In short, the 6.7 was good enough. The question is: Will there always be a desktop version CE that will let me work with, for example, five users for free, and then start to pay from user six, or in my case, three users? Right now, I do not see WaveMaker in this field, and there are others points to ask for from a desktop.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
73%
Computer Software Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you r...
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have incr...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Quick Base, TSheets
Pramati
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Vanenburg, Flanagan
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.