Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OutSystems vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems provides high ROI with faster app creation, cost-saving strategies, and positive user feedback despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase improved ROI through streamlined workflows, better data access, fewer errors, time savings, cost reductions, and enhanced productivity.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
OutSystems support is generally responsive but experiences vary, with better service at higher contract levels and valued documentation.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase support is efficient, communicative, and responsive, though complex issues may require extra payment, offering valuable technical assistance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems is scalable and robust, ideal for enterprise-level growth, especially in cloud-based and multi-tenant environments.
Sentiment score
7.6
QuickBase is scalable and reliable, supporting diverse roles and departments, with users rating its scalability between seven and nine.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is stable and reliable, highly rated for support and scalability but faces issues with massive user bases.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is praised for stability and reliability with minor performance issues, averaging user ratings between seven and ten.
 

Room For Improvement

OutSystems needs performance, integration, and cost improvements, along with better documentation, UI, AI integration, and cloud management.
QuickBase users need faster enhancements, a modern UI, improved reporting, seamless integrations, better visualization, and more user-friendly operations.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
 

Setup Cost

OutSystems pricing is often considered high, with costs based on user metrics, impacting small businesses but saving development time.
QuickBase pricing is about $300 per license, with enterprise costs around $18,000/year for ten seats and additional data volume charges.
 

Valuable Features

OutSystems excels in low-code development, effortless integration, and user-friendly features, making it a versatile and scalable platform.
QuickBase provides no-code app creation, real-time updates, automation, SQL-like linking, and dynamic forms, enhancing efficiency for midsize companies.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
 

Categories and Ranking

OutSystems
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
3rd
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st)
QuickBase
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
15th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Employee Time Tracking Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of OutSystems is 7.8%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Bireswar Das - PeerSpot reviewer
A low-code platform for the development of mobile and web enterprise applications
To illustrate a case, the customer initially had a private cloud, essentially a data center hosted within it. They needed a disaster recovery solution, which would involve using a public cloud. This situation led to some deployment challenges due to the hybrid nature of their setup. However, once we implemented the solution for them, they were extremely satisfied. The process was not only effective but also quite speedy. To be more precise, we completed it in around 100 days, even though they initially requested it to be done in four months. They were very pleased with the efficiency of the implementation.
Daniel Ream - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable
I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you r...
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have incr...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.