Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ranorex Studio vs Testim comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Ranorex enhances productivity, saves time and costs, automates testing, and improves efficiency with positive feedback on flexibility.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim's customer service is responsive and effective, providing quick assistance and high-quality support, especially for technical issues.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Testim offers effective scalability for varying user needs, resolving initial cost challenges and supporting medium organizations and DevOps teams.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim users report high stability and reliability, with minimal issues and unaffected outcomes from numerous code changes.
 

Room For Improvement

Testim requires improvements in UI efficiency, feature customization, comprehensive documentation, stability, and cost effectiveness for enhanced testing capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Ranorex Studio is seen as costly yet justified, offering flexible licensing with negotiable prices and customizable user fees.
Enterprise users find Testim cost-effective, appreciating its fixed pricing model and value compared to competitors with minimal extra costs.
 

Valuable Features

Testim offers record/playback, algorithm support, REST API, CLI integration, and AI features for efficient testing with ease.
 

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Regression Testing Tools (7th)
Testim
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
12th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.8%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?
Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?
I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
What needs improvement with Testim?
There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.