Ranorex Studio vs Testim comparison

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The solution is stable."

"Object identification is good."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The product is easy to use."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."