Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Red Hat and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while IBM is ranked #7. Red Hat holds a 4.6% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 71 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,705 Views
1,262 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,404 Views
1,334 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform compete in the deployment space, each with distinct strengths. While UrbanCode Deploy is favored for its pricing and support, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has the upper hand due to its robust features, offering significant value for the investment.

Features: UrbanCode Deploy is known for its server/agent architecture that supports repeatable deployments and robust plugin support, offering features like visual process design and self-service APIs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform emphasizes simplicity with script-based YAML configuration, providing agentless management and broad community support. It quickly scales from single servers to complex data centers, making automation accessible even to users without deep technical knowledge.

Room for Improvement: UrbanCode Deploy faces hurdles in plugin performance and integration with new technologies, with users seeking improved upgrade processes, reporting features, and reduced memory footprint for agents. Ansible could improve scalability, create a more intuitive GUI, and offer enhanced documentation. Both systems require stronger support networks, but UrbanCode Deploy needs more advanced plugin and compatibility enhancements with diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UrbanCode Deploy is popular in on-premises setups but also supports hybrid environments. Customer service experiences are mixed, with praise for technical expertise tempered by slow response times. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds. Its deployment ease is highlighted, often needing less direct support due to robust community resources and intuitive features. Some enterprise support challenges arise from its open-source nature and licensing complexities.

Pricing and ROI: UrbanCode Deploy generally incurs higher costs due to agent-based licensing and specialized support, yet achieves substantial ROI through more efficient deployments and reduced staffing. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's open-source nature significantly cuts costs, though expenses can rise with enterprise features like Ansible Tower. Both platforms offer considerable productivity gains that validate their costs within modern IT infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.6%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 4.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.6%
UrbanCode Deploy	4.6%
Other	90.8%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Sudhir Kumar Tiwari

DevOps Engineer at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Have managed thousands of servers with streamlined configuration processes

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very helpful due to passwordless integration and the ability to interact with multiple servers at once, which is especially advantageous when dealing with thousands of servers. The integration aspect of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has optimized my IT ecosystem significantly by consolidating multiple tools, such as a CI/CD pipeline with Jenkins, where we validate everything, including testing and SonarQube code quality. The agentless architecture of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, using the SSH key, makes it passwordless and allows us to push configurations with one click, creating a major advantage. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's main benefit is that it allows us to push configurations to multiple servers without manually visiting each one, maintaining efficiency.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended."

"It enabled me to take the old build manifest and automated everything. So when it came time to spin everything up, it was quick and simple. I could spin it up and test it out. And then, when it came time to roll production, it was a done deal. When we expanded to multiple data centers, it was same thing: Change a few IP addresses, change some names, and off we went."

"The Organizations feature, where I can give clear silos and hand them over to different teams, that's amazing; everybody says that it's their own Tower. It's like they have their own Tower out there."

"It increases our company's efficiency, automating all the simple tasks which used to take hours of somebody's time."

"The most useful features are the playbooks. We can develop our playbooks and simplify them doing something like a cross platform."

"Ansible Tower provides a GUI, which is an enhancement, and a well-liked feature by operation teams."

"The easy-to-read syntax for YAML files and the interoperability between modules are valuable."

"It's nice to have the Dashboard where people can see it, have it report to our ELK stack. It's far more convenient, and we can trigger it with API and schedules, which is better than doing it with a whole bunch of scripts."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

Cons

"In modern infrastructure, there are more than just servers. The initial server-centric approach in Ansible is a bit strange."

"The web GUI can be a little bit better. There should be a couple of more features."

"What I'm trying to figure out, personally, is, when doing mass updates, how I can parallelize that a little bit better. It seems right now - and maybe, it's a shortcoming on my end - that I run through one set of servers, and then another set of servers, ad then another set of servers, but it seems like I could throw a lot of these checks out. Different types of servers, like web servers and DB servers, if I could parallelize that a little bit to make everything run a little bit more efficiently, that would help."

"The documentation for the installation step of deployment, OpenStack, etc., and these things have to be a bit more detailed."

"What we need is model-driven, declarative software infrastructure management. However, things tend to break with new versions, requiring a lot of work to fix…The focus should be on improving the support for Ansible in the area of AI coding."

"We would like support for the post-integration of this product before cloud frameworks because right now their approach is to avoid using on-premises activities and move everything to the cloud."

"The communication on it is not probably where it could be. We could use some real life examples where we could point customers to them and say, "This is what you are trying to do. If you follow these steps, it would at least get you started a bit quicker.""

"I have observed that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could improve by creating modules for upcoming AI and ML tech stacks, as currently, specific modules for these are not available."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"I am using the community edition of the solution which is free."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

"Ansible is a lot more competitive than any of the others. Its setup was also straightforward. In fact, we just implemented Ansible on OpenShift, so that is how we are running the Ansible Automation Platform now."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

41%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 7% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 11% of the time

Spinnaker vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 6% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

October 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

October 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

uDeploy

Overview

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

November 2025

Free Report: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.