Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RSA enVision vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
RSA enVision offers responsive, knowledgeable, and professional customer support with swift issue resolution and excellent technical assistance.
Sentiment score
9.5
Seceon is praised for responsive customer service, efficient technical support, and effective problem-solving with comprehensive integration assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.4
RSA enVision needs customizable options, improved reporting, scalability, better support, and enhanced integration due to a steep learning curve.
Sentiment score
4.5
Seceon Platform needs cloud transition improvements, better CPU efficiency, enhanced features, global coverage, and improved documentation and management tools.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
RSA enVision efficiently scales for both large and small environments, seamlessly handling data growth and expanding network infrastructures.
Sentiment score
9.3
Seceon Platform is scalable, easily adapts to virtual environments, but some users are uncertain about large-scale deployments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.4
RSA enVision offers reliable, stable performance with efficient data handling and effective real-time monitoring, despite rare occasional lags.
Sentiment score
9.3
Seceon Open Threat Management is stable and efficient, quickly integrates, and receives positive feedback for resolving minor issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
RSA enVision provides scalable log management, real-time monitoring, alerting, detailed analytics, and customization, suitable for diverse requirements.
Sentiment score
8.2
Seceon Platform offers cost-effective, AI-driven cybersecurity with real-time threat detection, ease of management, and comprehensive integrations.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers cost-effective per-asset pricing, competitive rates, and flexibility without hidden fees.
 

Categories and Ranking

RSA enVision
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
34th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
23rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of RSA enVision is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

SF
Support both French and English, which is important for us and adapted to the evolving security landscape over time in my experience
You need a skilled engineer to deploy it because you can do anything with this tool. You can see everything on the network. A good engineer will be surprised and have fun using this tool because it's very powerful. Deployment process: You need to build a recipe/layout when you want to deploy something. Once the recipe is done, you just have to copy it. So you really need a good engineer at first, but then any other technician can copy the recipe. You don't need to be an expert once the recipe is finalized. So, once you have it set up, it's easy to deploy. But you need a good engineer to deploy it correctly. You will get alerts from the system, but if you want to fully explore and maximize the tool, the engineering needs are different.
Dipesh Jain - PeerSpot reviewer
Has the ability to categorize alerts and reporting dashboards are useful
The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively. The ability to categorize alerts and the reporting dashboards are valuable features. AI-driven analysis aids in identifying critical alerts, and real-time threat detection improves our response time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
27%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about RSA enVision?
The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with RSA enVision?
Licensing could be improved to be more oriented towards Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Perhaps offering different types of licensing would be beneficial, as it can be expensive for industries wi...
What advice do you have for others considering RSA enVision?
Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. I recommend using it, but it also depends on the needs and the budget. If I still had my company, I think we would continue using RSA enVision. However, ...
What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The implementation cost is extra, but the license cost is reasonable with no hidden costs.
What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth. Additionally, the non-core features need to increase in depth.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BPS (SUISSE), Hypovereinsbank Germany, MAX Hamburgers, Infoplex, Neotel, Telus
Caduceus, SUNY
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA enVision vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.