Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

Ruckus and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Ruckus is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sophos is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Ruckus holds a 1.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ruckus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 7 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,260 Views
738 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 20 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,357 Views
683 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Sophos Network Access Control and Ruckus Cloudpath are both key players in network security and access management. Ruckus Cloudpath is often viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher price.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control provides advanced threat detection, a robust firewall, and endpoint protection. Ruckus Cloudpath offers seamless integration with existing infrastructures, strong wireless authentication, and user-friendly device policy enforcement.

Room for Improvement: Sophos could enhance its wireless authentication capabilities, integration with third-party systems, and user-friendliness in certain complex setups. Ruckus Cloudpath might improve its initial deployment complexity, pricing flexibility, and further simplify its cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos offers straightforward on-premise deployment with excellent customer service, aiding users throughout the setup. Ruckus Cloudpath's cloud-based deployment provides flexibility but involves more complex initial configurations. Customer support is competent for both, with Sophos noted for its more hands-on assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Network Access Control offers lower setup costs and a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-oriented organizations. Ruckus Cloudpath, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers a longer-term ROI through its extensive features and integration capabilities, providing value-driven returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 1.3%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Xander Janse Van Rensburg

Head Of Technical Services at Emtelle

Helps to onboard corporate users based on certificate-based authentication

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process. Its most valuable feature is CA certification. You cannot get access without this. The tool's device policy enforcement feature has had a positive impact on customer network security. Customers are now more at ease, knowing that their employees connect to a secure network, and unauthorized individuals cannot easily access the corporate network. Overall, it has positively influenced their security measures. The user experience when connecting to networks via Ruckus Cloudpath is seamless. I would highly recommend it to anyone in need of an onboarding system for multiple users. Whether you want to move away from the standard connection, Active Directory, or even free keys, it is a reliable choice. Additionally, the product's licensing is user-based, not device-based. This means that regardless of the number of devices, the licensing is per-user.

Read full review

Marco-VIVALDELLI

CEO at MARVIV SRLS

Reliable with good security capabilities and an easy setup

The user interface, in terms of managing the product, could be better. For example, having some sort of configuration scanner could be useful. I need some sort of base solution that I can provide to the company to set up a first level of service for the company. That way, I can install the product and set up a first level of security. After that, we can run some analysis with the company, with the key manager, and so on, and then customize the product to better suit their needs. It would help us create more tailored policies. That said, we need to have some base configuration that we can use as a kickoff in terms of saying, "Okay, this is a first-level configuration; that is enough to guarantee a correct level of protection from your point of view." And in this way, there is the possibility in the weeks to follow to customize the product better and more effectively over time to introduce a second level of features more specific to a single company. What could be an improvement, and what more competitors are doing, is introducing more advanced features in terms of artificial intelligence. This product needs more AI. It's useful to introduce systems to help prevent problems and better identify issues. The product needs to centralize information from devices and work to create a common database where an AI algorithm could have access to all of the information worldwide and therefore become better at predicting issues and finding problems. They need to widen their vision in the way competitors are to provide a higher level of security going forward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."

"Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

"Web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering are the most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control."

"The user interface makes it easy to configure and use."

"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."

"The scalability of the system and the performance of the system and the solution's most valuable features."

"We have had interactions with the technical support team through the Xnet platform. It's good."

"The initial setup is very easy."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"The scalability could be better."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"In order to provide better management, it would be ideal with they offered better plugins for their firewall."

"Sophos Network Access Control requires a lot of resources to work, which is an area for improvement. Pricing could also be improved because it's costly."

"It would be good if Sophos Network Access Control had better integration with other devices."

"The user interface, in terms of managing the product, could be better."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"One area in which the product could be improved is the user interface. While functional, it can be somewhat cluttered and unintuitive, especially for new users."

"I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"It is quite expensive."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It wo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

I am not able to say much on the financial specifics as it pertains to the sales unit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

For now, I may not be able to say exactly what needs improvement. However, continuous development in specific areas might be required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 60% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 17% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 33% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 28% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 18% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 11% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 9% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

November 2024

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

November 2024

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Learn More

Ruckus

Sophos

Overview

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

December 2024

Free Report: Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.