Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

Ruckus and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Ruckus is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sophos is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. Ruckus holds a 1.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ruckus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 7 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,214 Views
717 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 20 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,277 Views
626 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Sophos Network Access Control and Ruckus Cloudpath are both key players in network security and access management. Ruckus Cloudpath is often viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher price.

Features: Sophos Network Access Control provides advanced threat detection, a robust firewall, and endpoint protection. Ruckus Cloudpath offers seamless integration with existing infrastructures, strong wireless authentication, and user-friendly device policy enforcement.

Room for Improvement: Sophos could enhance its wireless authentication capabilities, integration with third-party systems, and user-friendliness in certain complex setups. Ruckus Cloudpath might improve its initial deployment complexity, pricing flexibility, and further simplify its cloud management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sophos offers straightforward on-premise deployment with excellent customer service, aiding users throughout the setup. Ruckus Cloudpath's cloud-based deployment provides flexibility but involves more complex initial configurations. Customer support is competent for both, with Sophos noted for its more hands-on assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Sophos Network Access Control offers lower setup costs and a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-oriented organizations. Ruckus Cloudpath, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers a longer-term ROI through its extensive features and integration capabilities, providing value-driven returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 1.8%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 1.3%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Xander Janse Van Rensburg

Head Of Technical Services at Emtelle

Helps to onboard corporate users based on certificate-based authentication

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process. Its most valuable feature is CA certification. You cannot get access without this. The tool's device policy enforcement feature has had a positive impact on customer network security. Customers are now more at ease, knowing that their employees connect to a secure network, and unauthorized individuals cannot easily access the corporate network. Overall, it has positively influenced their security measures. The user experience when connecting to networks via Ruckus Cloudpath is seamless. I would highly recommend it to anyone in need of an onboarding system for multiple users. Whether you want to move away from the standard connection, Active Directory, or even free keys, it is a reliable choice. Additionally, the product's licensing is user-based, not device-based. This means that regardless of the number of devices, the licensing is per-user.

Read full review

Abdul Basit

Assistant Manager IT at Asia Petroleum Limited

An affordable solution that provides web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering

Web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering are the most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control Sophos Network Access Control needs improvement regarding its slow interface, loading time, and reporting. Big companies with 1,000 or 1,500 users might face difficulties using…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

"Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

"The user interface makes it easy to configure and use."

"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."

"Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything."

"We have had interactions with the technical support team through the Xnet platform. It's good."

"Web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering are the most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control."

"The scalability of the system and the performance of the system and the solution's most valuable features."

"What Sophos has done is integrate almost the entire OSI layer infrastructure. It gives me visibility across my infrastructure. It gives me visibility into all the mobile devices that are on my network and into the security I have on those mobile devices."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"The scalability could be better."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"What needs to be improved on is the fact that Sophos consumes a lot of processor resources and, once it starts scanning, the RAM utilization is very high."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

"I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device."

"The user interface, in terms of managing the product, could be better."

"Sophos Network Access Control needs improvement regarding its slow interface, loading time, and reporting."

"One area in which the product could be improved is the user interface. While functional, it can be somewhat cluttered and unintuitive, especially for new users."

"I would like more details on the incoming connection, like what is the download speed and how it fluctuates. If Sophos can give that information, it would be really good."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"It is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It wo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

I am not able to say much on the financial specifics as it pertains to the sales unit.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

For now, I may not be able to say exactly what needs improvement. However, continuous development in specific areas might be required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 61% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 22% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 16% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 34% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 33% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 21% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 12% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

February 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

January 2025

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Overview

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

January 2025

Free Report: Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.