SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Visual Paradigm comparison

SAP and Visual Paradigm are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. SAP is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.6, while Visual Paradigm is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. SAP holds a 8.9% mindshare in BPD, compared to Visual Paradigm’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Visual Paradigm users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP Signavio Process Manager and Visual Paradigm compete in the process management and modeling software category. SAP Signavio leads with robust process mapping and collaboration, while Visual Paradigm excels in comprehensive diagramming tools.

Features: SAP Signavio Process Manager is known for its collaborative capabilities, efficient process mapping, and strong integration features, ensuring smooth communication and governance. Visual Paradigm offers a diverse set of modeling tools focusing on UML, BPMN, and enterprise architecture, supported by an extensive template library, making it ideal for detailed system architecture design.

Room for Improvement: SAP Signavio Process Manager could improve user experience through a more intuitive design and enhanced process modeling features, along with better integration capabilities and document management. Visual Paradigm could enhance its user interface for easier navigation, lower system resource demand, and offer more compatibility with other tools to boost integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Signavio Process Manager offers flexible deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds, appealing to various enterprise preferences. Customer service is generally positive, though response times have lagged post-SAP acquisition. Visual Paradigm supports on-premises and hybrid cloud options, noted for ease of deployment and efficient customer support, with extensive documentation reducing technical queries.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Signavio is considered expensive but delivers significant ROI for large enterprises through process improvements and resource savings. Visual Paradigm is praised for its affordability, offering various licensing options, including a free community edition, making it accessible for smaller teams and individuals. Both products provide ROI, but Visual Paradigm is favored for budget-friendly tiers catering to diverse user needs.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Blueworks Live

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of IBM Blueworks Live is 3.5%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.9%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Paradigm is 6.7%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

AjarMathur

Global Innovation Director at Ernst & Young

An easily scalable and affordable solution that enables users to document and digitize processes with ease

IBM Blueworks is BPMN 2.0 compliant, but it does not adapt to the overarching BPMN 2.0 concepts. There is only one kind of BPMN 2.0 diagram. It is a process diagram. It doesn't have the concept of separate tools, which other products offer. If I had to do a hardcore BPMN 2.0 modeling, the product would have its own reservations. There were features we could not explore from a BPMN 2.0 perspective. Most of the time, people who are shifting from Microsoft Office tools to a digitized way of working still want the reporting capabilities to be strong. Some tools, like ARIS or Signavio, offer customized solutions from the reporting perspective. If I have documented my whole finance process and want to fetch out a complete SOP report in a very customized manner, IBM Blueworks cannot provide it. We have to rely on some other services. So that's one area in which we always struggled, how to really customize the reporting aspects. I understand that we need to keep the tool a little more asset-light. It's very difficult to keep adding many options, but at least a few BPMN 2.0 options were needed. We have been suggesting to IBM that we should have some way of customizing the reporting. At least we should get a custom way of reporting it into different formats like Excel or putting up a logo for one of the clients so that their SAP can be printed that way.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

DominicMackenzie

Senior data architect at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Very flexible and easy to use with a good pricing model

I have used erwin and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. The first time I used Visual Paradigm was when I was a university student. I didn't want to pay a lot of money and Visual Paradigm had a very good pricing model, so it meant that I could effectively pay for the level of sophistication that I was using at the time and dial it back down to a simpler version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are you using the product as a process mapping tool and as part of a larger process improvement project. We use it with IBM BPM and IBM ODM. We get an automated workflow solution for our customers, an improved workflow automation."

"The solution is stable. All the refreshes run very well."

"For me the most valuable feature is that it's one depository for our bank. So it's not like everybody has their critical processes on SharePoint or on their desktops. Everything is centrally located. It's very intuitive, easy to use. The support that I get from IBM is always great."

"You can use if from your mobile device or you can be on the desktop. It doesn't matter. You are always connected. It is cloud-based, so you don't have to install anything."

"Business users understand it really well, which means we can then help them automate their business processes."

"It's very easy, very quick to create a process map. It has templates. The look and feel is very nice. What we want to achieve out of the process map, we can achieve it using Blueworks."

"The ease of documenting and digitizing the processes was valuable to us."

"It has a built-in capability to capture process owners and managers against processes along with other process governance roles."

More IBM Blueworks Live pros

"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."

"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."

"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."

"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."

"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager is very responsive."

"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

"The most valuable feature of Visual Paradigm is the ability to design form flows, add libraries, create organizational charts, and connect them all together."

"The most valuable feature of the Visual Paradigm that I use is process modeling. Additionally, the solution has a complete set of features."

"I love Visual Paradigm because it has many different types of diagrams. For any field of engineering, we can find a diagram."

"It is a scalable solution since it can be used at an individual level as well as for enterprise-sized businesses."

"The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features are pricing and functionality."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Stable design software with multiple functions and features. It's simple to install and easy to use."

"The pricing model is attractive."

More Visual Paradigm pros

Cons

"The ability to create a very structured rule. With the capability that we have right now, Blueworks Live is more process focused. We should be able to enhance it to include a lot more of decisions as well."

"I would like to see integration with ERP systems. This would help us to simulate the process and see where the problems are. Though IBM Blueworks Live is a good tool for documenting, it is not good for simulating."

"The user interface is quite easy at first but process analysts soon run into roadblocks of limited functionality, which is disappointing."

"In the Blue Works Live software boxes and lines are automatically placed by the programme and can't be easily manipulated."

"I wish Blueworks Live had simulations built in, but it doesn't. It also lacks a feature of reporting; ad hoc, drag and drop reporting. A lot of senior people are always asking for reports, and there's no reporting feature within IBM Blueworks."

"I can't insert any images. For example, within the process map, if I want to put it in the box or rectangle, or circle. If I have to use one image or icon, that's not possible."

"We'd also like to see it be Six Sigma or Lean compatible, a lot of people have asked about that."

"In the solution Signavio, they have a customer journey mapping feature that should be added to IBM Blueworks Live. It's valuable to map or document the customer journey to identify the pains and opportunities in this process."

More IBM Blueworks Live cons

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

"The product's pricing could be improved."

"The licensing model could be better."

"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."

"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

"The free trial needs to have more options for end users, such as including Process Intelligence as a trial version."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

"The user interface is not easy to navigate, so it should be made easier."

"I would like to see the ability to easily export to groupware, such as Atlassian Confluence."

"I would like to see something for visualizing innovation work maps."

"From time to time, we experience some troubles when we work as teams."

"Visual Paradigm's initial deployment was difficult since we did it for the first time. It is challenging to learn to use the product."

"The solution is not user-friendly. It uses a lot of memory and CPU. You have to have a good computer to use it."

"Visual Paradigm is much better now. But each project has its own challenges, which is why I'm exploring different tools for my new projects. For instance, designing reports can be tough, especially with the costly intervention of professional services from vendors."

"There is a certain inherent complexity when creating UML diagrams."

More Visual Paradigm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not very expensive."

"Making it less expensive would be good."

"Based on the licenses purchased, from a footprint perspective, you can have as many people as you want. You have multiple different categories of licenses to keep the cost low."

"There are editor licenses that are around 50 euros per month, and contributor licenses that are around 30 euros per month."

"We are seeing ROI from this solution. The solution has saved us time."

"Price wise, IBM Blueworks Live is in the middle range, and I would give it a five out of ten."

"The solution is very, very cost-effective."

"They have a free subscription model that gives a lot of power to the users."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

"I rate Visual Paradigm's pricing a five out of ten."

"You can move between the tiers from month to month so you are not restricted to one pricing model."

"In terms of pricing, I find Visual Paradigm's subscription services reasonable, especially for the modern and standard editions. However, the premium products can be a bit pricey, especially considering our location in the Middle East. Currently, paying around a hundred dollars per user translates to almost six hundred Egyptian pounds, which can add up. For enterprise licensing, I think the perpetual license option could be more affordable. If it were cheaper, say around five hundred dollars, I would have invested in multiple perpetual licenses long ago. Sometimes, to manage costs, we share accounts among team members or switch access on and off for certain members who aren't actively working on projects. As for additional costs, there are charges for cloud services, which I'm considering because I've already exceeded the free capacity."

"Pricing for Visual Paradigm is a four out of five for me. I'm happy with its pricing."

"You can use Paradigm on a subscription basis and you can choose from different tiers of subscription."

"Visual Paradigm's pricing is not expensive."

"This product is fairly cheap, but if you want more complex features, e.g. integration with other products, it does require an additional cost."

"Over the years I've seen an increase in price, and it makes it difficult for a single person company, like me, to decide whether to extend the license."

More Visual Paradigm pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Blueworks Live?

The solution is easy to operate. Also, there is an automatic mode to make the business flow. You don't have to put an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Blueworks Live?

The solution costs around 600-700 dollars/year, which is quite affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Blueworks Live?

Sometimes, the tool is automatic, which can complicate it, but once you're accustomed to manipulating it, you can use...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Paradigm?

The solution is the best application for data modeling. It helps to architect business processes. Its best features a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Paradigm?

I mentioned using the free version. The free version of Visual Paradigm does not incur any setup costs and offers a s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Paradigm?

I didn't use it so deeply that I found areas that needed improvement or features that were missing. So far, its exist...

See all answers

Comparisons

Visio vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 37% of the time

Lucidchart vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 15% of the time

ARIS Cloud vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 8% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Blueworks Live

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Blueworks Live Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 22% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 38% of the time

Visio vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 19% of the time

Lucidchart vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 15% of the time

Bizagi vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 8% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Visual Paradigm

Compared 1% of the time

More Visual Paradigm Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Blueworks Live

December 2024

Download IBM Blueworks Live product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

November 2024

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Paradigm

November 2024

Download Visual Paradigm product report

Also Known As

IBM Lombardi Blueprint

Signavio Process Editor

No data available

Learn More

IBM

Video not available

SAP

Video not available

Visual Paradigm

Overview

IBM Blueworks Live is a cloud-based business process modeling tool that helps you discover, map and document your processes. It is easy to use, allowing you to learn and perform business process modeling in minutes.

With Blueworks Live you can:

Simplify business process modeling
Quickly build business processes in a straightforward, cloud-based interface designed for both IT and business users.

Improve process efficiency and accuracy
A central process repository eliminates version control and consistency issues by providing users real-time access to process workflows.

Enhance cross-team collaboration
A shared team workspace engages all business process owners, encouraging cross-team participation and continuous process improvement.

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

Visual Paradigm is a UML tool. The tool is designed for a wide range of users including software engineers, system analysts, business analysts and system architects, or for anyone who is interested in reliably building large-scale software systems using an object-oriented approach. In addition, Visual Paradigm supports the latest standards of UML notation.

Sample Customers

Cloudsoft Corp. Ltd., Bayer, S¾SS, Essex County Council

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Adobe, Apple, at&t, Caterpillar, Intel, NASA, Nokia, Toyota

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm

December 2024

Free Report: SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Visual Paradigm report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.