SAS Access vs Toad Data Point comparison

SAS and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #54, while Quest Software is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.0. SAS holds a 0.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

286 Views
239 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Toad Data Point

Read 3 Toad Data Point reviews

579 Views
491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Toad Data Point

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and Toad Data Point are key players in data analysis and management. Toad Data Point leads in feature set and value for investment, while SAS Access excels in pricing and support, attracting a loyal customer base.

Features: SAS Access provides integrated analytics, broad database support, and compatibility with SAS software. Toad Data Point offers robust visualization options, simplified cross-platform queries, and efficient data connectivity, making it suitable for professionals aiming for in-depth data analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Toad Data Point allows for easy deployment with quick installation and an intuitive learning curve, backed by responsive customer service. SAS Access involves a more complex setup but provides comprehensive training resources to aid deployment and assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access features competitive pricing and flexible licensing, yielding a high return on investment for organizations seeking extensive data capabilities. Toad Data Point, although potentially more expensive, offers significant long-term efficiency gains through its rich feature environment, contributing to substantial ROI for data-centric operations.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

54th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Toad Data Point

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Preparation Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Access is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad Data Point is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Aaron Payne

ERP Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offers power developers the tools they need

I am not the end user of this solution. I am not close enough to it because I manage the platform that it runs against. The end users who use the Toad tool come against the database that my team manages, so it is hard for me to provide any area for improvement when it comes to the Toad tool. However, in the administration case, cost is a significant issue. The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"We love it."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

Cons

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Healthcare Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Point?

The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Point?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Point?

We primarily use Toad Data Point for end users where SQL Developer does not provide sufficient tooling. Toad Data Point offers better SQL development tools compared to SQL Developer, making it the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SAS Enterprise Guide vs Toad Data Point

Compared 21% of the time

Alteryx vs Toad Data Point

Compared 20% of the time

SSIS vs Toad Data Point

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Toad Data Point

Compared 14% of the time

Denodo vs Toad Data Point

Compared 13% of the time

More Toad Data Point Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2025

Download SAS Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point

December 2024

Download Toad Data Point product report

Also Known As

SAS/Access

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

SAS

Quest Software

Overview

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

Toad Data Point is a cross-platform, self-service, data-integration tool that simplifies data access, preparation and provisioning. It provides nearly limitless data connectivity, desktop data integration, visual query building and workflow automation.

Sample Customers

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Concordia University

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point

January 2025

Free Report: SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.