Top 10 SAS Access Alternatives

Vendor: SAS

4.5 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

697 followers

Top SAS Access Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAS Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Informatica PowerCenter

4.0 out of 5

Informatica PowerCenter

4.0 out of 5

Informatica PowerCenter offers superior integration and scalability for complex data environments, while SAS Access provides strong data analytics with easy deployment. In comparison, SAS Access is ideal for businesses focused on analytics, whereas Informatica PowerCenter suits high-volume data processing.

Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. SAS Access Report

Pricing

Informatica PowerCenter has a higher setup cost compared to SAS Access, making SAS Access a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Informatica PowerCenter has a higher setup cost compared to SAS Access, making SAS Access a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.

SSIS

3.8 out of 5

SSIS

3.8 out of 5

SAS Access excels in analytical capabilities and suits users needing robust data handling. In comparison, SSIS is ideal for those valuing comprehensive ETL and seamless Microsoft integration. Tech buyers may choose SAS Access for advanced analytics or SSIS for cost-effective data transformation.

Download SAS Access vs. SSIS Report

Pricing

SAS Access generally has a higher setup cost than SSIS, offering extensive integration capabilities, while SSIS provides a more budget-friendly setup option with flexible data transformation features.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Data Integrator excels with ETL capabilities and extensive integration, suiting enterprise tasks. In comparison, SAS Access is valued for strong analytics and seamless data format connectivity, ideal for data-driven operations. Tech buyers choose based on integration needs versus analytical focus.

Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. SAS Access Report

Pricing

Oracle Data Integrator's setup cost is competitively priced, offering comprehensive integration features, while SAS Access has a higher setup cost, reflecting its robust data access capabilities. Each solution caters to different budget considerations with distinct feature offerings.

View comparison

Pricing

Denodo

4.0 out of 5

Denodo

4.0 out of 5

SAS Access excels in pricing and support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers and simpler integration needs. In comparison, Denodo offers advanced data virtualization and real-time access, which justify its higher cost for businesses with complex data management requirements.

Download Denodo vs. SAS Access Report

Pricing

SAS Access has a higher setup cost compared to Denodo, which offers a more cost-effective onboarding solution. This difference makes Denodo a more budget-friendly option in terms of initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

SAS Access has a higher setup cost compared to Denodo, which offers a more cost-effective onboarding solution. This difference makes Denodo a more budget-friendly option in terms of initial costs.

IBM Cloud Pak for Data

4.0 out of 5

IBM Cloud Pak for Data

4.0 out of 5

SAS Access offers advanced data access with seamless integration for customizable database solutions. In contrast, IBM Cloud Pak for Data provides a unified AI-driven platform promoting efficiency and future scalability, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing strategic cloud-native positioning over traditional deployment.

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access Report

Pricing

SAS Access is noted for its flexible setup cost, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Data incurs a higher initial setup fee.

View comparison

Pricing

SAS Access is noted for its flexible setup cost, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Data incurs a higher initial setup fee.

Toad Data Point

4.5 out of 5

Toad Data Point

4.5 out of 5

SAS Access attracts tech buyers with its comprehensive connectivity and easy deployment. In comparison, Toad Data Point appeals through advanced visualization and intuitive analytics. SAS Access's economical pricing suits budget-conscious organizations, while Toad Data Point delivers significant ROI through extensive features.

Download SAS Access vs. Toad Data Point Report

Pricing

SAS Access has a higher setup cost, while Toad Data Point offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

SAS Access has a higher setup cost, while Toad Data Point offers a more budget-friendly option.

ViaSQL by Adaptigent

1 out of 5

ViaSQL by Adaptigent

1 out of 5

ViaSQL enables powerful data extraction from complex sources through standard SQL queries. It provides direct access to all your system databases, allowing teams to seamlessly manage enterprise data with ease. The powerful tool opens bi-directional access to both mainframe and distributed data sources, enabling rapid web and cloud application development. Gone are the days of complex and time-consuming legacy data management practices!

View comparison

Related categories

Data Integration

Data Visualization

Data Virtualization