Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs SAS Access comparison

IBM and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while SAS is ranked #56. IBM holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAS users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Read 13 IBM Cloud Pak for Data reviews
  • 2,927 Views
  • 2,047 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
SAS Access
Read 3 SAS Access reviews
  • 267 Views
  • 224 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and IBM Cloud Pak for Data are competitors in the data management and analytics space. IBM Cloud Pak for Data appears superior due to its comprehensive suite of analytic tools, offering extensive data processing capabilities.

Features: SAS Access integrates with varied data sources, offers robust connectivity, and is ideal for specific integrations. IBM Cloud Pak for Data provides an end-to-end solution, supports multi-cloud environments, and offers AI-driven analytics, making it versatile for complex data environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access is noted for straightforward deployment and reliable customer support, beneficial for organizations with limited IT resources. IBM Cloud Pak for Data uses containerized deployment, offering flexibility for cloud-native architectures but requires more infrastructure expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access has a lower initial setup cost, supporting quicker ROI for smaller projects. IBM Cloud Pak for Data demands higher investment but offers potentially higher ROI through extended capabilities, suitable for large-scale deployments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Ranking in Data Integration
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Data Virtualization (3rd)
SAS Access
Ranking in Data Integration
56th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Access is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Michelle Leslie - PeerSpot reviewer
Starts strong with data management capabilities but needs a demo database
What I would love to see is an end-to-end, almost a training demo database of some sort, where one of the biggest problems with data management is demonstrated. There are so many components to data management, and more often than not, people understand one thing really well. They may understand DataStage and how to move data around, but they do not see the impact of moving data incorrectly. They also do not see the impact of everyone understanding a piece of data in the same way. I would love Cloud Pak to come with a demo database that illustrates the different components of data management in a logical way, so I can see the whole picture instead of just the area I'm specializing in. It would be great if Cloud Pak, from a data modeling point of view, allowed us to import our PDMs, for example. It would be ideal to import and create business terms in Cloud Pak. The PEA would be great to create the technical data. The association between the business and the technical metadata could then be automated by pulling it through from your ACE models. The data modeling component is available in Cloud Pak. Additionally, when it comes to Cloud Pak, even though it has the NextGen DataStage built into it, there is Cloud Pak for data integration as well. Currently, I do not think we have a full enough understanding of how CP4D and CP4I can enhance each other.
Read full review
Robert Heck - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible
I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can model the data there, connect the data models with the business processes and create data lineage processes."
"The most valuable features of IBM Cloud Pak for Data are the Watson Studio, where we can initiate more groups and write code. Additionally, Watson Machine Learning is available with many other services, such as APIs which you can plug the machine learning models."
"The most valuable features are data virtualization and reporting."
"Cloud Pak is a very, very, very good system."
"Cloud Pak's most valuable features are IBM MQ, IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, and ISPF."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is the Modeler flows. The ability to develop models using a graphical approach and the capability to connect to various sources, as well as the data virtualization capabilities, allow me to easily access and utilize data that is dispersed across different sources."
"Its data preparation capabilities are highly valuable."
"DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Data pros
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
 

Cons

"The interface could improve because sometimes it becomes slow. Sometimes there is a delay between clicks when using the software, which can make the development process slow. It can take a few seconds to complete one action, and then a few more seconds to do the next one."
"One challenge I'm facing with IBM Cloud Pak for Data is native features have been decommissioned, such as XML input and output. Too many changes have been made, and my company has around one hundred thousand mappings, so my team has been putting more effort into alternative ways to do things. Another area for improvement in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is that it's more complicated to shift from on-premise to the cloud. Other vendors provide secure agents that easily connect with your existing setup. Still, with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, you have to perform connection migration steps, upgrade to the latest version, etc., which makes it more complicated, especially as my company has XML-based mappings. Still, the XML input and output capabilities of IBM Cloud Pak for Data have been discontinued, so I'd like IBM to bring that back."
"The solution's user experience is an area that has room for improvement."
"The solution could have more connectors."
"The product must improve its performance."
"The tool depends on the control plane, an OpenShift container platform utilized as an orchestration layer...So, we have communicated this issue to IBM and asked if it is feasible to adapt the solution to work on a Kubernetes platform that we support."
"The setup cost is very expensive. The cost depends on the pieces of the solution I'm using, how much data I have, and whether it's on the cloud or on-prem."
"The solution's catalog searching or map search needs to be improved."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Data cons
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the licensing of the solution, there is a yearly payment that needs to be made. Also, since it is expensive, cost-wise, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten."
"IBM Cloud Pak for Data is expensive. If we include the training time and the machine learning, it's expensive. The cost of the execution is more reasonable."
"I don't have the exact licensing cost for IBM Cloud Pak for Data, as my company is still finalizing requirements, including monthly, yearly, and three-year licensing fees. Still, on a scale of one to five, I'd rate it a three because, compared to other vendors, it's more complicated."
"Cloud Pak's cost is a little high."
"It's quite expensive."
"I think that this product is too expensive for smaller companies."
"The solution's pricing is competitive with that of other vendors."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."
"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
The setup cost is very expensive. The cost depends on the pieces of the solution I'm using, how much data I have, and whether it's on the cloud or on-prem.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Data?
What I would love to see is an end-to-end, almost a training demo database of some sort, where one of the biggest problems with data management is demonstrated. There are so many components to data...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Compared 41% of the time
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Compared 19% of the time
Azure Data Factory vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data Logo
Azure Data Factory vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Compared 15% of the time
Denodo vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data Logo
Denodo vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Compared 11% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data Logo
Palantir Foundry vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Compared 7% of the time
More IBM Cloud Pak for Data Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
March 2025
IBM Cloud Pak for Data reportDownload IBM Cloud Pak for Data product report
Buyer's Guide
Data Integration
February 2025
SAS Access reportDownload SAS Access product report
 

Also Known As

Cloud Pak for Data
SAS/Access
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak® for Data is a fully-integrated data and AI platform that modernizes how businesses collect, organize and analyze data to infuse AI throughout their organizations. Cloud-native by design, the platform unifies market-leading services spanning the entire analytics lifecycle. From data management, DataOps, governance, business analytics and automated AI, IBM Cloud Pak for Data helps eliminate the need for costly, and often competing, point solutions while providing the information architecture you need to implement AI successfully.

Building on the streamlined hybrid-cloud foundation of Red Hat® OpenShift®, IBM Cloud Pak for Data takes advantage of the underlying resource and infrastructure optimization and management. The solution fully supports multicloud environments such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud™ and private cloud deployments. Find out how IBM Cloud Pak for Data can lower your total cost of ownership and accelerate innovation.

IBM
SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.
SAS
 

Sample Customers

Qatar Development Bank, GuideWell, Skanderborg Music Festival
Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access
March 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Access report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.