SAS Activity-Based Management vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

SAS Activity-Based Management and Workiva Wdesk compete in the performance management software space. Workiva Wdesk often seems superior due to its comprehensive features and favorable ROI feedback.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management focuses on cost and profitability analysis, leveraging powerful analytics and modeling. It enables OLAP drilling for data presentation and extraction. The tool allows complex cost allocation traceability across multiple layers. Workiva Wdesk shines with collaborative reporting and compliance capabilities. It offers integrated document management and automation for reporting schedules. Notable for its API connectivity, Wdesk enhances data consolidation and modification while ensuring ease in user management.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management can improve by enhancing its cloud capabilities, reducing IT resource demands for deployment, and simplifying its complex model construction processes. A more intuitive user interface would enhance user experience. Workiva Wdesk could benefit from better cost optimization to compete with SAS's pricing. Adding more advanced analytics features would strengthen its market position. Expanding support for more diverse compliance frameworks could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management offers on-premise deployment with customizable options, though it demands significant IT resources. Its tailored approach supports complex business needs. Workiva Wdesk uses a cloud-based model that simplifies setup, complemented by proactive customer service for efficient onboarding. Its deployment is appreciated for minimizing setup complexities and enhancing user support.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management has higher setup costs but promises extensive ROI through detailed cost analytics. Workiva Wdesk involves substantial initial investment but delivers significant ROI with enhanced compliance and reporting efficiency. Workiva's agile systems often reflect better returns on investment relative to their setup expenses compared to SAS.