Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Scality RING vs StorMagic SvSAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Scality RING8 support is skilled but occasionally requires repeated explanations due to unique customer setups, yet remains positively received.
Sentiment score
10.0
StorMagic SvSAN offers highly praised, responsive 24/7 customer support with knowledgeable consultants and efficient problem-solving.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Scality RING needs improved S3 compliance, streamlined capacity expansion, better scalability, and support for varied processor architectures.
Sentiment score
3.8
StorMagic SvSAN's licensing limits features; users seek better backup, multi-node support, and improved UI with cloud options.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Scality RING8 offers improved scalability, managing petabytes for enterprises, but past issues existed, especially with migrations.
Sentiment score
7.8
StorMagic SvSAN enables scalable edge device setups, supporting up to three servers, but advanced networking aids in easier expansion.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Scality RING offers secure, efficient storage with S3/CDMI support, erasure coding, and scalability for large organizations.
Sentiment score
8.4
StorMagic SvSAN offers cost-effective, reliable high availability with easy integration, minimizing latency and downtime in two-node setups.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
StorMagic SvSAN provides cost-effective storage solutions with competitive pricing and enterprise features, eliminating SAN hardware expenses.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
StorMagic SvSAN is highly praised for stability, efficient resource use, reliable redundancy, and performance during power outages.
 

Categories and Ranking

Scality RING
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (16th)
StorMagic SvSAN
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
HCI (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of Scality RING is 3.7%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StorMagic SvSAN is 7.4%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
 

Featured Reviews

Guillaume Lapouge - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers UTIPI (Unified Tiered Infrastructure Per IOPS) feature in billing but lacks extensive testing
It's a very good product, but for large-scale usage, it has limitations. Scality RING's lack of extensive testing and potential hidden limitations. While Scality provides precise architecture guidelines for sizing the storage infrastructure, Orange utilizes a different processor architecture for its Ovi servers, requiring additional optimization beyond what Scality offers. In essence, the product lacks third-party optimization capabilities.
Levent Ozdayi - PeerSpot reviewer
The best choice for performance and price
The primary use case for StorMagic SvSAN is providing availability to different sites. You can have multiple sites, all of which will replicate the data to each other StorMagic SvSAN's best feature is that it is platform agnostic. It also provides configuration flexibility as it's fully…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Scality RING8?
Another feature I like is the life cycle management that helps me with data storage efficiency.
What needs improvement with Scality RING8?
It's a very good product, but for large-scale usage, it has limitations. Scality RING's lack of extensive testing and potential hidden limitations. While Scality provides precise architecture guide...
What is your primary use case for Scality RING8?
I work with Scality RING for storage, and we have a concrete strategy to offer it to business customers. Many customers use it for different purposes, but a common use case is for user computer bac...
What do you like most about StorMagic SvSAN?
It helps us prevent any data loss while working with the failover clusters.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorMagic SvSAN?
It is a fair trade. It is a little bit expensive at first blush just in terms of the initial licensing cost. I have been in the tech industry for a long time. I have worked for startups, and I unde...
What needs improvement with StorMagic SvSAN?
It could be a little bit more intuitive in terms of the way you set it up initially. The interface has recently undergone a revision. I have been using the new version for only a few weeks now. The...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Scality RING, RING8
StorMagic
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Comcast, TimeWarner Cable, EuroSport, Orange, Deluxe, DailtMotion, SFR, RTL, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Telstra
Sheetz Inc., Giant Eagle, RWE Renewables, Keiser Corp., TDK, Oxford University, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Rommelsbacher, Mt. Hood Meadows Ski Resort, Eugen Forschner GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about Scality RING vs. StorMagic SvSAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.