Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
StorMagic SvSAN Logo

Top 10 StorMagic SvSAN Alternatives

Vendor: StorMagic
4.3 out of 5
1,239 followers
Start review

Top StorMagic SvSAN Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to StorMagic SvSAN based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, StarWind Virtual SAN, and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

StorMagic SvSAN surpasses its competitors by offering remarkable simplicity, flexibility, and cost efficiency through centralized management, minimal hardware requirements, and high availability, ensuring seamless operation and scalability for edge computing environments.

StorMagic Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with StorMagic, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage suits large-scale settings with advanced scale-out capabilities, offering high performance and robust ROI. In comparison, StorMagic SvSAN is ideal for edge computing, excelling in affordability and ease of use for smaller, decentralized environments.
Download Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage involves higher setup costs, while StorMagic SvSAN offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Red Hat Ceph provides comprehensive capabilities compared to StorMagic SvSAN, which focuses on simplified and cost-effective deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage involves higher setup costs, while StorMagic SvSAN offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Red Hat Ceph provides comprehensive capabilities compared to StorMagic SvSAN, which focuses on simplified and cost-effective deployments.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StarWind Virtual SAN
4.8 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN appeals with cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, StarWind Virtual SAN attracts those seeking advanced features like synchronous replication. StorMagic’s quick ROI suits smaller deployments, while StarWind’s robust capabilities benefit enterprises focused on performance.
Download StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for low setup costs, offering an affordable entry point, whereas StarWind Virtual SAN is noted for having higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a significant pricing differential between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for low setup costs, offering an affordable entry point, whereas StarWind Virtual SAN is noted for having higher initial setup expenses, highlighting a significant pricing differential between the two solutions.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
4.3 out of 5
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure excels in high-performance I/O and ease of administration, offering advanced features and high redundancy. In comparison, StorMagic SvSAN is platform-agnostic, leveraging existing hardware for high availability without downtime, making it a budget-friendly option for cost-conscious tech buyers.
Download Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) generally has higher initial setup costs, offering robust capabilities, whereas StorMagic SvSAN is noted for its lower setup costs, appealing to users focused on budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) generally has higher initial setup costs, offering robust capabilities, whereas StorMagic SvSAN is noted for its lower setup costs, appealing to users focused on budget constraints.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct
3.6 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN appeals to small businesses with its affordability and ease of use. In comparison, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct offers advanced integration with Windows Server, appealing to enterprises needing extensive scalability and functionality despite higher costs.
Download Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN's setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, whereas Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct incurs a higher initial expense, reflecting its advanced feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN's setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, whereas Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct incurs a higher initial expense, reflecting its advanced feature set.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
DataCore SANsymphony
4.6 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN, noted for simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appeals to edge computing environments and smaller businesses. In comparison, DataCore SANsymphony, with advanced features and scalability, meets the needs of large enterprises, offering robust storage management and long-term value.
Download DataCore SANsymphony vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN has a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while DataCore SANsymphony involves a higher initial investment, targeting enterprises looking for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN has a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while DataCore SANsymphony involves a higher initial investment, targeting enterprises looking for advanced features.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
Scality RING
3.9 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
Scality RING
3.9 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN is valued for its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, ideal for edge computing. In comparison, Scality RING excels in scalability and advanced features, catering to enterprises needing complex data handling and prepared for more intricate installations, offering significant long-term value.
Download Scality RING vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for its affordability in setup costs, while Scality RING often incurs higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN is praised for its affordability in setup costs, while Scality RING often incurs higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
4.8 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN attracts tech buyers with its simplicity and affordability for edge computing. In comparison, StarWind HyperConverged Appliance appeals to those seeking scalability and a robust feature set for comprehensive virtual environments. Both offer significant ROI, catering to different business priorities and infrastructure needs.
Download StarWind HyperConverged Appliance vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN offers a lower setup cost than StarWind HyperConverged Appliance, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, the StarWind solution might include added features justifying its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN offers a lower setup cost than StarWind HyperConverged Appliance, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, the StarWind solution might include added features justifying its higher initial investment.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
HPE StoreVirtual
4.1 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
HPE StoreVirtual
4.1 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effective pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, HPE StoreVirtual attracts those needing advanced features like integrated data protection, catering to enterprises seeking robust functionalities despite higher initial costs.
Download HPE StoreVirtual vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN offers lower upfront setup costs compared to HPE StoreVirtual, which is known for its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN offers lower upfront setup costs compared to HPE StoreVirtual, which is known for its higher initial investment.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
LINBIT SDS
1 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
LINBIT SDS
1 out of 5

LINBIT keeps Linux systems up and running. As the developers of DRBD® software (www.linbit.com), LINBIT has led the way in high availability since 2001. DRBD has been included in the Linux kernel since version 2.6.33 (2009), has been deployed on all major Linux distributions and is fully compatible with systems, applications, devices and services.

View comparison
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StarWind Virtual Tape Library
5.0 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN excels in cost-effective edge storage, with straightforward scalability for budget-focused IT environments. In comparison, StarWind Virtual Tape Library offers advanced data retention and seamless backup integration, appealing to those prioritizing robust archival capabilities despite higher initial costs.
Download StarWind Virtual Tape Library vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN has a lower setup cost than the StarWind Virtual Tape Library. StarWind's setup, while efficient, incurs higher initial expenses, contrasting with StorMagic's more budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN has a lower setup cost than the StarWind Virtual Tape Library. StarWind's setup, while efficient, incurs higher initial expenses, contrasting with StorMagic's more budget-friendly approach.
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
StorMagic SvSAN Logo
IBM Spectrum Accelerate
4.0 out of 5
StorMagic SvSAN is favored for cost-effectiveness and simplicity, ideal for edge computing. In comparison, IBM Spectrum Accelerate offers high scalability and integration, appealing to enterprises needing robust solutions. StorMagic suits smaller businesses, while IBM provides long-term value through advanced features.
Download IBM Spectrum Accelerate vs. StorMagic SvSAN Report
StorMagic SvSAN offers a low-cost setup, whereas IBM Spectrum Accelerate presents a significantly higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
StorMagic SvSAN offers a low-cost setup, whereas IBM Spectrum Accelerate presents a significantly higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.

Related categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS)
HCI
File and Object Storage