Skyhawk Security vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

The compared Skyhawk Security and Zscaler solutions aren't in the same category. Skyhawk Security is ranked #20 in CWPP , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. Zscaler is ranked #2 in SASE , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Skyhawk Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Skyhawk Security and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in cybersecurity solutions. Based on the data, Zscaler seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features and efficiency, while Skyhawk appeals with cost-effectiveness and strong support.

Features: Skyhawk Security offers advanced threat detection, real-time monitoring, and robust cloud protection. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform emphasizes seamless zero trust architecture, advanced encryption, and faster secure access facilitating complex security operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skyhawk Security ensures a straightforward deployment with minimal configuration and responsive customer service. Zscaler provides a scalable deployment approach with extensive support documentation and resources aimed at larger enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Skyhawk Security presents a lower upfront setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with immediate ROI potential. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, with higher initial costs, promises significant long-term ROI through enhanced security and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 896,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Mindshare comparison

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Skyhawk Security	0.7%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud	13.2%
AWS GuardDuty	10.4%
Other	75.7%

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	8.8%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	10.2%
Cato SASE Cloud Platform	7.9%
Other	73.1%

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl

Cloud threat validation has reduced alert fatigue and now focuses investigations on real attacks

Skyhawk Security is pretty solid overall, but there are a few things I wish were better. One thing would be more native integration with Microsoft security tools such as Sentinel and Defender, since those are what we use daily. Having deeper built-in integration instead of relying on generic SIM connections would save time. The training and documentation could also be more comprehensive, with more real-world use case examples specific to different industries. Additionally, having more general customization for the AI models to adjust what gets flagged as anomalous in our specific environment would help reduce alert noise. These are pretty minor improvements, and most of them are probably already in their roadmap based on their recent updates adding self-AI training and bulk status changes for their customers. I believe a mobile app would benefit SOC analysts who need to respond frequently while on the go, as most of the platform feels focused on desktop use. Having a robust mobile experience for approving automated responses and reviewing critical alerts would be really useful.

Read full review

Vibin Thomas

Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems

Zero trust access has transformed remote connectivity and now simplifies secure app usage

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, especially Zscaler Private Access, is very strong, though there are a few areas where improvements can be made. One challenge observed is around initial troubleshooting and visibility. While Zscaler Private Access provides logs, it can sometimes take time to pinpoint the exact cause of access issues, especially in complex environments with multiple policies and identity integration. Another area is the dependency on identity and connector health. Since Zscaler Private Access is heavily reliant on app connectors and identity providers, any issues with these components can impact user access, making proper monitoring critical. During the initial setup, policy configuration and application onboarding require careful planning, especially for larger environments with many applications. These challenges are manageable with proper design and monitoring. Overall, the platform delivers strong security and user experience. I would recommend a few improvements, especially around user interface, reporting, and troubleshooting experience. From a user interface perspective, while the platform is powerful, the policy configuration and navigation can feel complex, especially for new users. A more simplified and intuitive layout for policy mapping and application access would help reduce the learning curve. In terms of reporting, Zscaler Private Access provides logs, but having more built-in customizable dashboards and analytics would be very helpful. Better visibility into user access patterns, application performance, and real-time troubleshooting insights would improve operational efficiency. From a support and troubleshooting standpoint, it would be beneficial to have more granular centralized visibility, allowing for quick end-to-end tracing of a user request from authentication to application access without switching between multiple views. These improvements would make the platform even more efficient, especially for large-scale enterprise environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features I appreciate is the ability to generate daily reports without relying on anyone else."

"By integrating TotalCloud, we have significantly reduced vulnerabilities in our deployment pipeline."

"Qualys TotalCloud provides a single, prioritized view of risk, reducing the workload associated with consolidating multiple sources for risk prioritization."

"The scalability is good as well. I would rate it ten out of ten."

"I would recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other users because it is cost-efficient and has a good return on investment."

"I would definitely recommend Qualys TotalCloud to other users."

"I would rate Qualys TotalCloud ten out of ten."

"If someone were to ask me to review Qualys TotalCloud, I would summarize it as an end-to-end solution for cloud security with visibility and governance-grade controls without needing to manage multiple disconnected tools."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"The initial setup process is easy and intuitive."

"Skyhawk Security has plenty of products and subscriptions available, and at this moment, Skyhawk Security appears to be the leading company in the cybersecurity area."

"Skyhawk Security has positively impacted my organization because we are a small security team, and Skyhawk Security allows us to prioritize our work."

"We fell in love at the first sight."

"It helps us in reaching the ISO27001 certification."

"Skyhawk Security has had a really positive impact on our organization, especially in reducing false positives and speeding up incident response times."

"The UI is easy to use."

"The scalability by definition is kind of intrinsically built-in."

"The scalability is pretty good."

"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."

"The tool's scalability is good."

"The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances."

"It's one of the easier products on the market as far as set-ups and deployments. Even across their whole product suite, they've made it pretty simple."

"The policies are very easy to implement."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"With the growing integration of AI, I would like Qualys to enhance its service offerings to better accommodate AI-related risks."

"The support process is inefficient due to the excessive number of replies required when submitting tickets."

"A feature improvement could be the inclusion of Windows OS support for container security, as it is currently only supported for Linux."

"The vulnerability part is good, but the policy compliance module needs improvement because it involves a lot of manual work. Specifically, the remediation part of the controls requires enhancements."

"Overall, we are satisfied with it. However, the response part of the Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) module can be improved. It is not yet in place according to requirements; it is not completely available even though the module has been released."

"An area for improvement would be to focus on risks related to AI, such as large language models and potential data leakage."

"It has been working very well, but it would be helpful if the dashboard could generate reports tailored to specific compliance needs. For example, in India, we have to comply with RBI and SEBI guidelines. It w"

"The response part of the Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) module can be improved."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"The solution needs automatic testing."

"I wish there was more transparent self-service pricing information available instead of having to go through sales to get the details."

"Skyhawk Security can be improved mainly by improving the UI so it is a little bit easier to use, and the speed that it takes pages to load are the main downfalls."

"The platform’s interface needs enhancement."

"The solution needs automatic testing."

"The product is not reliable."

"The tool must provide IP-blocking features."

"The pre-defined dictionaries could be improved."

"From a user interface perspective, while the platform is powerful, the policy configuration and navigation can feel complex, especially for new users."

"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."

"The only issue with Zscaler Cloud DLP is that it only gives you DLP protection from web traffic, which is flowing out, while a full-blown DLP solution such as Forcepoint or Symantec gives you DLP coverage for multiple channels. Zscaler Cloud DLP doesn't give you coverage for email, fax, and USB channels, and this is the only challenge or room for improvement in the solution. It's just an extension on top of what you're buying on the proxy, so it's just an added layer, and it doesn't cover DLP on a very broad level. I'm unsure if Zcaler is in the business of competing with a full-blown DLP solution, and if there's a plan to expand the features of Zscaler Cloud DLP beyond the web channel because you'll have to deploy a full-blown agent for it. I'm unsure if this is on the cards because the solution is just an added layer that you get with your proxy. I've asked the Zcaler team whether there's a plan to go full DLP in the future, but I didn't get a positive response. There isn't any feature I'd like added to Zscaler Cloud DLP currently, because anything you could think of that should be in cloud or SaaS solutions is already there, except for machine learning, as it's the only functionality that seems to be lacking in the solution. Machine learning is an additional policy available in other DLP solutions in the market, but my team didn't find it in Zscaler Cloud DLP."

"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."

"The granularity in blocking is not sufficient, as new domains are automatically blocked for 30 days without further information."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qualys TotalCloud offers competitive pricing given its comprehensive suite of features, including integration, assessment, remediation, and detection capabilities, all within a single platform."

"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"The pricing for TotalCloud is attractive and competitive in the market. Given the features, especially the dashboard, I have no concerns regarding pricing."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility."

"TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be."

"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"Zscaler DLP solution is expensive, with a fixed pricing structure that is billed annually and monthly. There are no additional costs for licenses."

"There is definitely an ROI."

"As per industry leads, Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"It's an affordable solution"

"Zscaler Cloud DLP is moderately priced. We pay around 2 million rupees per year."

"It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	28

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple en...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

Our use case involves the assets that we have under cloud, the assets exposed to the internet, and the internal appli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud Native Protector?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that Skyhawk Security is a very affordable product, probably...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Radware Cloud Native Protector?

I cannot point exactly to what should be improved at this moment. From my experience, it is mixed. I have worked with...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud Native Protector?

I have moved to another niche and switched to work with the Oracle Cloud platform. I need clarification on the scenar...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure ac...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler SASE?

The solution needs to improve a lot of aspects.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zscaler SASE?

We are using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange for its Zscaler Internet Access service. It provides web security, DLP, data...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nucleus Security vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

Wiz vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 29% of the time

Orca Security vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 13% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Skyhawk Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Skyhawk Security Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

May 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

May 2026

Download Skyhawk Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

May 2026

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

Radware Cloud Native Protector

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Skyhawk Security provides advanced threat detection and response, offering businesses comprehensive cybersecurity management in an ever-evolving digital landscape.

Skyhawk Security stands out in threat intelligence, delivering robust solutions tailored to enhance cybersecurity protocols for organizations. It specializes in detecting and analyzing potential threats with high accuracy, effectively minimizing risks. Its intuitive technology allows for streamlined integration and efficient scalability, making it adaptable for businesses of different sizes and requirements.

What features does Skyhawk Security offer?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies threats quickly and accurately, reducing potential risks.
Scalability: Adapts to business size and growth without compromising performance.
Intuitive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems for easier management.

What benefits should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual security management, saving costs.
Improved Risk Management: Enhances identification and response capabilities, lowering threat impacts.
Time Savings: Automates routine tasks, allowing teams to focus on strategic security measures.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Skyhawk Security to strengthen their defenses against cyber threats, ensuring data protection and compliance with industry regulations. Its adaptable solutions provide the reliability needed in these sectors, offering peace of mind and robust security management.

Skyhawk Security

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

VPN-less Connectivity: Enables secure remote access without traditional VPNs.
Cloud-based Security: Offers scalable protection utilizing cloud infrastructure.
Single Sign-On: Integrates with multiple identity providers for streamlined access.
Dynamic URL Categorization: Provides real-time URL filtering to enhance security.
Advanced Threat Protection: Detects and mitigates sophisticated threats effectively.
Customizable Policies: Allows tailored security protocols to fit unique requirements.
Comprehensive DLP: Protects sensitive data through robust data loss prevention.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with cloud services and applications.

What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

Enhanced Security: Delivers consistent protection regardless of user location.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Streamlined Access: Simplifies connectivity to private and cloud applications.
Scalability: Supports expanding organizational demands with cloud scalability.
Real-time Visibility: Provides instant insights into security incidents and network traffic.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Skyhawk Security vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.