Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Snowflake vs Snowflake Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st)
Snowflake Analytics
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Web Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Snowflake is 28.7%, up from 23.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake Analytics is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Q&A Highlights

AM
Feb 02, 2022
 

Featured Reviews

VivekSingh 1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good data ingestion capability, but should include more AI capabilities
The solution's integration aspect is good, and all the connectors are in place. I found Snowflake similar to RDS. We use it for both data in motion and data in transit. It looks like the tool handles the data quite securely. We create ETL patterns. We ingest data from different source systems, and we have to create data pipelines. It would be useful if we could have AI features added to identify what I'm going to do with this data. It would be good if it could look at the data and help me create an automated pipeline instead of me creating a pipeline by myself. I'm from a retail background. I completed my Oracle DBA training a long time ago, about 18 years ago. I was quite familiar with the Snowflake and relational database concepts since I had already completed the Oracle ops, DBA ops, OCP, and OPA courses. For me, it was a journey similar to when I shifted from Oracle RDS to Snowflake. Although I was quite familiar with most of the concepts, there were some learnings. Whosoever is in the data field should at least try Snowflake once. They will then realize the best features in the solution and can continue using it. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Manoj Kambli - PeerSpot reviewer
For processing data, it can be easily optimized and supports structured and unstructured data
In terms of cost. Many customers face issues with the expenses on Snowflake. The pricing visibility is complex. If you understand pricing, you can estimate costs, but if not, it can be challenging. They need to provide better cost visibility upfront. For example, credits are not always utilized properly, which isn't easy for new users. A more user-friendly cost calculator would help, as the current one requires expertise to use effectively. These things are not easy for someone who is new to Snowflake, unlike Azure's calculators, which give good visibility into the cost. It does have a calculator, but you need to be skilled in using it. Otherwise, it's hard to estimate the total cost for future loads. For additional features, there could be its own AI model like Google has Gemini. Snowflake can come up with those kinds of features for Analytics. If you can just type in your prompt and get answers, especially for Analytics people on the client side, they will love that. Like, in Google's Gemini, you type the prompt and get the answers based on the data available. If they come up with that kind of AI and UI, it will be easier for clients to analyze their data. They can just type a query like, "What is my highest selling product?" They don't have to write a complex query.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like Snowflake's data exchange capabilities. It can exchange data with downstream systems and other vendor partners as well."
"A user-friendly and reliable solution."
"Snowflake is an enormously useful platform. The Snowpipe feature is valuable because it allows us to load terabytes and petabytes of data into the data mart at a very low cost."
"It was relatively easy to use, and it was easy for people to convert to it."
"All the people who are working with Snowflake are extremely happy with it because it is designed from a data-warehousing point of view, not the other way around. You have a database and then you tweak it and then it becomes a data warehouse."
"The Mbps they have established is quite a bit faster than any other data warehouse."
"Its performance is most valuable. As compared to SQL Server, we are able to see a significant improvement in performance with Snowflake."
"The tool is very easy to use. The solution’s desktop features are also very easy to use. Also, the product’s SQL-based connectivity is also good. It can connect with any tool."
"One advantage is that installation is unnecessary since it's cloud-based. You subscribe to a Snowflake instance, configure it, and start using it. It's very user-friendly and allows you to scale up or down based on usage."
"The computational power of Snowflake is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Snowflake Analytics is the ability to control and manage the cost."
"I am impressed with the product's data-sharing feature."
"It's cloud-based technology, so users can spin it up a lot faster"
"It ensures the optimization of the application development while maintaining the user-friendly nature of its UI."
"The performance has been good."
"Time Travel and Snowpipe are good features."
 

Cons

"Snowflake has to build more capabilities because they have only built very few adapters, but they're growing and they're building. They should provide provisions to collect ETL pipeline capabilities, reduce developer work, and make more rapid application development, rather than some customizations. There are very few options, but they are building. I hope they will build ETL rapid application development provisions with more variety."
"We would like to have an on-premises deployment option that has the same features, including scalability."
"It would benefit from an administration that allows you to be aware of your credit consumption once you have the service so that you may be sure how many credits you are consuming when you use the platform and to make sure that you are making the most efficient use of these resources. In other words, to improve their interface so that you may monitor the consumption of your credits on Cloud."
"It needs a bit more rigor and governance, which is something you don't get with newer tools. This makes it less enterprise scalable. Its governance and structure can be enhanced, which would really be valuable. I would like to see some kind of prebuilt functionality in terms of having almost like a pre-built data warehouse. A functionality for generating automated kind of pieces would be good."
"There are some stored procedures that we've had trouble with. The solution also needs to fine-tune the connectors to be able to connect into the system source."
"An additional feature I'd like to see is called materialized views, which can speed up some run times. I'd like it to be able to be used where you can have multiple tables inside them; materialized view. That would be nice. As well as being able to run cursors, to be able to do some bulk updates and some more advanced querying, table building on the fly."
"To ensure the proper functioning of Snowflake as an MDS, it relies heavily on other partner tools."
"I would like to see a client version of the GUI."
"The solution's high price can be an area of concern that needs improvement."
"I cannot comment on the product's stability because we are still struggling with its performance."
"Machine learning should be improved."
"The distribution methodology isn't as strong as Bethesda or SAP HANA. It's not as strong as other competitors."
"The technical support is not very good."
"Machine learning in Snowflake isn't as advanced as in other products. I haven't heard of any successful industry-wide use cases of machine learning implemented in Snowflake. It might take a couple of years to reach the same level as Databricks."
"I don't see many drawbacks with Snowflake Analytics, but it's not as mature as other tools. It is evolving and needs to integrate various features, like data loading and analytics, better. These components are not fully connected, so the tool should become a more integrated application."
"If you have a lot of computations, it becomes very costly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They give a different price for every single company. I don't know if I negotiated that well, but we got the enterprise tier for $3 a credit, and the other two were a dollar-ninety a credit. I suspect we don't have almost zero compute usage, but I know that our annual contract packages are below all of their minimums."
"Snowflake’s pricing is transparent. It is one of the cheapest cloud database warehouse providers. The tool follows a credit cost model. Everything on Snowflake is charged on the basis of credits. The credits depend on the cloud region and the public cloud provider that we use. Hence, the cost per credit will be different for AWS in Frankfurt and AWS in India. I think North Virginia is the cheapest region in terms of cost per credit. You will be consuming around 16 credits for large data warehouses."
"Snowflake licensing is more flexible and it is cheaper than other solutions. I can use it for only 10 days for MVP, or three years, and for flexible models. I can scale up, or down, and the pricing is based on the volume and duration. There are many licensing permutation combinations available."
"The solution is expensive but worth the cost because the quality is there."
"Comparing Snowflake to on-prem options such as Oracle or SAP, it seemed more cost-effective."
"Snowflake is expensive, but when I consider what we get for that price, it's fair. I rate the solution three out of five for affordability, right in the middle."
"It is pay-as-you-go. Its cost is in the medium range."
"The solution is costly, making it unsuitable for midsize organizations due to its price."
"Snowflake Analytics is not an expensive solution, and its pricing is average."
"The cost of Snowflake Analytics is low, any small organization can use it."
"I have been using free trial version."
"The solution's pricing is affordable."
"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price."
"The product's pricing is subjective."
"It is an expensive solution, but the kind of usability and flexibility it proactively provides for the organizations justify the price."
"The solution's price is high and I would rate it an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

AM
Feb 2, 2022
Feb 2, 2022
I wrote a white paper on this that you can download here:https://bit.ly/3bRTCqp It comes down to five factors, in my opinion: 1. Options for Deployment - Can you deploy on any cloud, or on-premises?2. External tables and analyze in-place features - Can you leverage data outside the DB?3. Optimizations - What are the options for slow-running queries?4. Depth of analytics - can you do ML, time-s...
2 out of 6 answers
EB
May 24, 2021
Hello @Anoop Anoop SLK ​, @NitinKumar , @Subhrajit Mitra ​and @Yash Mittal. Can you please share your experience?
Steve Sarsfield - PeerSpot reviewer
May 25, 2021
I wrote a white paper on this that you can download here:https://bit.ly/3bRTCqp It comes down to five factors, in my opinion:  1. Options for Deployment - Can you deploy on any cloud, or on-premises?2. External tables and analyze in-place features - Can you leverage data outside the DB?3. Optimizations - What are the options for slow-running queries?4. Depth of analytics - can you do ML, time-series, geospatial, SQL, Python, etc.5. Other data governance features - encryption and other governance features Of course, speed and scalability is a huge factor, but most people are on top of that. The white paper was commissioned by Vertica, a player you didn't mention above, but I attempted to keep it vendor-neutral. 
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
35%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
The pricing part is based on the computing and storage. The costs are different and then there are services costs as well. I have heard that Snowflake is costlier than Redshift or GCP BigQuery. A s...
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
I think people do not want to create pipelines for many customers now. Normally, we have this layer architecture, like layer one, layer two, layer three, or layer four, where we have raw data, inte...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake Analytics?
I would rate the pricing of Snowflake Analytics a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. Especially when compared to competitors and what they offer, the pricing is good. Users p...
What needs improvement with Snowflake Analytics?
Snowflake Analytics should probably have more built-in tools for master data management, data purification, and enhancement. Instead of using third-party tools, it would probably be good if it coul...
 

Also Known As

Snowflake Computing
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Lionsgate, Adobe, Sony, Capital One, Akamai, Deliveroo, Snagajob, Logitech, University of Notre Dame, Runkeeper
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake vs. Snowflake Analytics and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.