Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Snowflake vs Snowflake Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Snowflake users experience mixed ROI; challenges in calculation exist, but long-term benefits include cost reduction and improved data management.
Sentiment score
6.6
Snowflake Analytics offers potential 40-50% performance benefits and cost savings, though financial returns vary based on user needs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Snowflake's customer service is praised for expertise and helpfulness, though some note delays and lack of SLAs.
Sentiment score
7.0
Snowflake Analytics receives praise for responsive support, though some suggest improvements in complex issue resolution and occasional delay handling.
I received great support in migrating data to Snowflake, with quick responses and innovative solutions.
The technical support from Snowflake is very good, nice, and efficient.
The technical support for Snowflake Analytics is excellent based on what I have heard from others.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Snowflake is praised for scalability and efficiency, but concerns exist regarding cost-effectiveness in medium to large-scale organizations.
Sentiment score
8.0
Snowflake Analytics efficiently manages large data volumes with dynamic cloud scaling, offering superior scalability and cost efficiency versus competitors.
The billing doubles with size increase, but processing does not necessarily speed up accordingly.
Snowflake is very scalable and has a dedicated team constantly improving the product.
It supports both horizontal and vertical scaling effectively.
Storage is unlimited because they use S3 if it is AWS, so storage has no limit.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Snowflake is praised for stability and reliability, with users noting excellent performance, quick issue resolution, and robust architecture.
Sentiment score
8.5
Snowflake Analytics is highly rated for its stable and reliable performance, ensuring minimal disruptions and high availability.
Snowflake as a SaaS offering means that maintenance isn't an issue for me.
Snowflake is very stable, especially when used with AWS.
Snowflake Analytics is stable, scoring around eight point five to nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Snowflake users seek improved UI, pricing transparency, analytics, integrations, AI features, and enhanced support, ETL, and machine learning capabilities.
Snowflake Analytics needs improved integration, machine learning, speed, user interface, cost transparency, data handling, and real-time support.
Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently require SQL coding, which might be challenging for some users.
Cost reduction is one area I would like Snowflake to improve.
If it offered flexibility similar to Oracle and supported more heterogeneous data sources and database connectivity, it would be even better.
AIML-based SQL prompt and query generation could be an area for enhancement.
Navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when looking for details like the account ID.
 

Setup Cost

Snowflake's pricing offers flexibility but can be unpredictable and expensive compared to Redshift or BigQuery, with room for transparency improvements.
Snowflake Analytics offers flexible, region-dependent pricing, deemed costly by some but competitive due to its ease and flexibility.
Snowflake's pricing is on the higher side.
Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating resource usage.
Snowflake Analytics is quite economical.
Snowflake charges per query, which amounts to a very minor cost, such as $0.015 per query.
Snowflake is better and cheaper than Redshift and other cloud warehousing systems.
 

Valuable Features

Snowflake excels in scalable, secure data processing with fast queries, multi-format support, and seamless third-party integration for AI/ML.
Snowflake Analytics provides efficient, secure, and scalable data management, supporting seamless integration and cost-effective analytics with advanced features.
One key feature is the separation of compute and storage, which eliminates storage limitations.
Being able to perform AI and Machine Learning in the same location as the data is quite advantageous.
Snowflake Analytics supports data security with a single sign-on feature and complies with framework regulations, which is highly beneficial.
Running a considerable query on Microsoft SQL Server may take up to thirty minutes or an hour, while Snowflake executes the same query in less than three minutes.
It is a data offering where I can see data lineage, data governance, and data security.
 

Categories and Ranking

Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st), AI Synthetic Data (1st)
Snowflake Analytics
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Web Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Snowflake is 18.2%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake Analytics is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Q&A Highlights

AM
Feb 02, 2022
 

Featured Reviews

Snehasish Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Transformation in data querying speed with good migration capabilities
Snowflake is a data lake on the cloud where all processing happens in memory, resulting in very fast query responses. One key feature is the separation of compute and storage, which eliminates storage limitations. It also has tools for migrating data from legacy databases like Oracle. Its stability and efficiency enhance performance greatly. Tools in the AI/ML marketplace are readily available without needing development.
Paresh_Nayak - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables data-driven decision-making with robust features and effective scalability
The internal design engine and the columnar database are particularly valuable. These features reduce input and output memory, which is crucial in handling large data sets. The solution fulfills the business requirement for scaling and analytics. Snowflake Analytics supports data security with a single sign-on feature and complies with framework regulations, which is highly beneficial.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

AM
Feb 2, 2022
Feb 2, 2022
I wrote a white paper on this that you can download here:https://bit.ly/3bRTCqp It comes down to five factors, in my opinion: 1. Options for Deployment - Can you deploy on any cloud, or on-premises?2. External tables and analyze in-place features - Can you leverage data outside the DB?3. Optimizations - What are the options for slow-running queries?4. Depth of analytics - can you do ML, time-s...
2 out of 6 answers
EB
May 24, 2021
Hello @Anoop Anoop SLK ​, @NitinKumar , @Subhrajit Mitra ​and @Yash Mittal. Can you please share your experience?
Steve Sarsfield - PeerSpot reviewer
May 25, 2021
I wrote a white paper on this that you can download here:https://bit.ly/3bRTCqp It comes down to five factors, in my opinion:  1. Options for Deployment - Can you deploy on any cloud, or on-premises?2. External tables and analyze in-place features - Can you leverage data outside the DB?3. Optimizations - What are the options for slow-running queries?4. Depth of analytics - can you do ML, time-series, geospatial, SQL, Python, etc.5. Other data governance features - encryption and other governance features Of course, speed and scalability is a huge factor, but most people are on top of that. The white paper was commissioned by Vertica, a player you didn't mention above, but I attempted to keep it vendor-neutral. 
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Retailer
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
It is complicated to understand how requests impact warehouse size. Unlike competitors such as Microsoft and Databricks ( /products/databricks-reviews ), Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating ...
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
There is a need for a tool to help me estimate the cost of using Snowflake. Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently r...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake Analytics?
Snowflake Analytics is quite economical. It does not appear to incur significant extra expenses beyond the solution's initial cost. However, a complete pricing analysis is still in progress.
What needs improvement with Snowflake Analytics?
The advantages of Snowflake Analytics outweigh the disadvantages. However, if it offered flexibility similar to Oracle and supported more heterogeneous data sources and database connectivity, it wo...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Snowflake Computing
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Lionsgate, Adobe, Sony, Capital One, Akamai, Deliveroo, Snagajob, Logitech, University of Notre Dame, Runkeeper
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake vs. Snowflake Analytics and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.