Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Stackify vs Zabbix comparison

Stackify and Zabbix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Stackify is ranked #65, while Zabbix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 71% of Stackify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.
Stackify
Read 6 Stackify reviews
  • 563 Views
  • 427 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
Zabbix
Read 103 Zabbix reviews
  • 5,433 Views
  • 4,263 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Stackify are both prominent in the monitoring and performance management space. Stackify seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior usability, making it a preferred choice for those valuing streamlined operations over cost.

Features: Zabbix is highly customizable, scalable with excellent monitoring, and alerting capabilities. Stackify offers integrated APM, log management for more insights in a single platform, and ease of use with a broader range of tools.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix could enhance its documentation and system configuration process. Stackify's anomaly detection and pricing model flexibility need improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix's deployment is straightforward yet time-consuming, with mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness. Stackify provides a quicker setup process and highly supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is favored for its zero-cost licensing, promising high ROI due to low initial costs but requiring setup and maintenance investment. Stackify may have a higher upfront cost, but its features and efficiency gains justify the price according to users, resulting in improved productivity and operational insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Stackify vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Stackify vs. Zabbix
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Stackify
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
65th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
62nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (60th)
Zabbix
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
10th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Moses Arigbede - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure
They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.
Read full review
ASM Naushad Alam - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes
We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."
"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The deployment is very fast."
"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"Zabbix is quite stable once it is set up. We haven't had any post-setup issues."
"The solution is quite mature and very stable."
"The implementation process is very straightforward."
"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."
"The level of discovery-based configuration that lets us auto-configure the monitoring for various systems is a valuable feature."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
More Zabbix pros
 

Cons

"The search feature could be improved."
"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."
"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."
"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."
"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."
"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."
"The server monitoring could be better."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
More Zabbix cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."
"I use the tool's free version."
"Zabbix is an open-source tool, and it's free to use."
"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
"It is freeware. We still use the free version of Zabbix."
"There are no licenses."
"We are using the free, open-source version."
"We purchased Zabbix for a good price, including support"
"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."
More Zabbix pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Zabbix?
The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?
I use the tool's free version.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zabbix?
I'm using the free version of Zabbix, and I'd like to see more customization options, especially for setting trigger thresholds.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

New Relic vs Stackify Logo
New Relic vs Stackify
Compared 57% of the time
Dynatrace vs Stackify Logo
Dynatrace vs Stackify
Compared 43% of the time
More Stackify Competitors
LibreNMS vs Zabbix Logo
LibreNMS vs Zabbix
Compared 9% of the time
Icinga vs Zabbix Logo
Icinga vs Zabbix
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmk vs Zabbix Logo
Checkmk vs Zabbix
Compared 7% of the time
Centreon vs Zabbix Logo
Centreon vs Zabbix
Compared 4% of the time
Nagios XI vs Zabbix Logo
Nagios XI vs Zabbix
Compared 3% of the time
More Zabbix Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Stackify
October 2024
Stackify reportDownload Stackify product report
Buyer's Guide
Zabbix
October 2024
Zabbix reportDownload Zabbix product report
 

Learn More

Stackify
Zabbix
 

Overview

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need. 

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

  • Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.

  • Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.

  • Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.

  • Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view. 

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services. 

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting. 

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

 

Sample Customers

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion
1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba
Buyer's Guide
Stackify vs. Zabbix
November 2024
Free Report: Stackify vs. Zabbix
Find out what your peers are saying about Stackify vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Stackify vs. Zabbix report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.