SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows Server are major players in the enterprise operating system market. SUSE Linux Enterprise has the upper hand in stability and memory efficiency, while Windows Server integrates seamlessly into Microsoft ecosystems, enhancing its appeal.
Features: SUSE Linux Enterprise provides an offline repository in DVD media, convenient administration tools through YaST, and robust support for SAP HANA. Windows Server offers tight integration with Active Directory, broad support for enterprise applications, and extensive application compatibility.
Room for Improvement: SUSE Linux Enterprise could enhance its package management and improve cloud interaction. Issues with security compliance in specific environments and integration complexity with Autodesk are noted areas for development. Windows Server faces criticism over performance and integration issues, as well as expensive licensing. Users desire better patch management, stability enhancements, and a revised pricing strategy.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SUSE Linux Enterprise excels in flexibility across varied cloud environments, supported by strong community interaction and responsive technical assistance. Despite commendable enterprise-level support, Windows Server users experience update-related dissatisfaction and integration complexities.
Pricing and ROI: SUSE Linux Enterprise is seen as cost-effective with simplified licensing and both free and paid support options, ensuring positive ROI. Windows Server, though perceived as expensive with a complex licensing model, is justified by its Microsoft ecosystem integration. Nonetheless, many users seek more competitive pricing.
I have seen a return on investment by switching our clusters from on-prem to Azure public cloud, using our same Bring Your Own Licenses, which saved costs on licensing.
We're very competitive commercially and technically because of it.
We've seen value in Windows Server because the systems work smoothly without any problems.
Windows Server offers excellent value for money, particularly when compared to alternatives.
The customer support is good; whenever we have opened a case, they have provided detailed explanations of the issues and resolutions.
Our in-house team can also solve most issues.
If you go through a partner who sells or supports Windows, the support could be around seven out of ten, because Windows relies on these partners for assistance.
Microsoft's technical support for Windows Server has been lacking, with rare responses even with premium support.
Its scalability is quite good since we are using Azure, which allows us to easily scale up or down our resources as needed.
I've worked in companies with 20,000 to 100,000 users, and it scales beautifully without issues.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.
It's definitely scalable.
When HANA is utilized by many applications, I notice that while utilization does increase, we have never faced lagging or server unresponsiveness.
We have experienced no blue screens or crashes and often achieved an uptime of 2,000 to 3,000 days without any issues whatsoever.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
The tool is stable.
The software manager was different, making it challenging to install certain applications.
The license we subscribed to should carry over within the same instance family.
We face difficulties troubleshooting issues without sufficient resources.
From a security perspective, sometimes, malware attacks and hackers take advantage of the tool's vulnerabilities.
Deploying antivirus and firewall software on the server is advisable, but having an external firewall adds an extra layer of security.
Windows Server needs to improve its speed and stability.
Upgrading an instance results in overlapping or double subscription fees.
The licensing cost is a bit high.
It is quite expensive.
Previously, a Windows Server with two processors cost around two 154 euros annually, but now it is estimated to be around 3,000 to 4,000 euros for the same configuration.
On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I rate it ten out of ten.
SUSE Linux had a clean user interface, which was a valuable feature for me.
It has a stable and reliable OS.
The LVM is very easy to configure, along with simple disk scanning compared to other systems.
Windows Server is a stable and scalable solution.
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that every Microsoft product is scalable, flexible, secure, and available on a certain budget.
The IP directory is the most valuable feature.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Windows Server | 9.8% |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise | 6.6% |
| Other | 83.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 77 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 41 |
| Large Enterprise | 88 |
SUSE Linux Enterprise offers features like YaST for server management, seamless integration with Oracle and SAP, and a robust security setup. Renowned for stability, it efficiently supports workstations, SAP workloads, and cloud migrations across diverse industries.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is known for its lightweight design, high performance, and ease of installation. Its flexible architecture supports extensive documentation and efficient patching. The system uses the BTRFS file system for effective virtualization, and community support is significant. However, challenges include package updates causing conflicts, difficult initial setup and software management, high pricing, and support response times. Improvements in security compliance, cloud integration, hardware compatibility, and documentation are also needed.
What are SUSE Linux Enterprise's important features?
What benefits should users expect from using SUSE Linux Enterprise?
Industries like healthcare and banking use SUSE Linux Enterprise for secure transactions and structured application deployment. It is also a choice for organizations involved in testing, automation, and web development, offering support for SAP HANA integration and facilitating cloud migrations.
Windows Server is primarily used by organizations for hosting applications, deploying virtual machines, managing user accounts, and supporting enterprise infrastructures. It also assists in virtualization, remote access, web servers, and integrating with cloud environments.
As a key component in enterprise environments, Windows Server supports backend applications and operating systems. It's valued for its robust virtualization capabilities through Hyper-V, enabling organizations to efficiently manage resources and reduce costs. Active Directory facilitates management of user accounts and security policies. Additionally, it excels in hosting SQL databases, file-sharing, and executing communication tasks. The system's integration with Microsoft services enhances its adaptability in cloud deployments and network management. Performance and security features contribute to a reliable platform for managing diverse business operations.
What are the key features of Windows Server?Windows Server is widely adopted in industries requiring stable, secure infrastructure solutions. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for managing databases, hosting business applications, and optimizing virtualization strategies. In sectors like finance and healthcare, enhanced security features and integration with cloud environments prove essential for meeting regulatory requirements and supporting data-intensive processes.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
