

SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows Server are competitors in the enterprise server solutions market. SUSE Linux Enterprise seems to have the upper hand in scenarios requiring robust Linux-specific utilities and handling SAP HANA and Oracle stacks, while Windows Server stands out for seamless integration with Microsoft products.
Features: SUSE Linux Enterprise provides stable kernel management, comprehensive server administration via YaST, and adaptable application deployment mechanisms, beneficial for enterprise platforms like SAP HANA and Oracle. Windows Server offers easy integration with Microsoft products, notable Active Directory management, and straightforward application hosting bolstered by broad application support.
Room for Improvement: SUSE Linux Enterprise has room to better integrate with cloud-based systems, simplify package management complexity, and enhance pricing competitiveness. Increased community engagement could also enhance support speed and portability. Windows Server could minimize licensing complexity, streamline security patches, and lower costs. Improving integration with non-Windows platforms and simplifying management tools also present opportunities for development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SUSE Linux Enterprise is versatile in its deployment across private, public, and hybrid cloud environments, supported by efficient but varied regional customer service. Its extensive management tools may initially seem complex. Windows Server is similarly deployed in diverse environments and is known for familiarity and ease of use, especially for businesses already using Microsoft products, though its support service performance lacks consistency.
Pricing and ROI: SUSE Linux Enterprise delivers a lower initial cost than competitors like Red Hat, backed by promising ROI in SAP settings. While its licensing is competitive, costs show an upward trend. Windows Server, with higher expenses and intricate licensing, still provides strong value for firms deeply connected with Microsoft ecosystems. SUSE offers significant cost savings in cloud transitions, and Windows offers enduring value due to its widespread compatibility.
I have seen a return on investment by switching our clusters from on-prem to Azure public cloud, using our same Bring Your Own Licenses, which saved costs on licensing.
Windows Server offers excellent value for money, particularly when compared to alternatives.
The tool supports many applications.
You get a standard platform that is very secure and stable.
SUSE Linux Enterprise provides a stable, secure, and well-supported platform for enterprise workloads, with powerful management tools and robust support for clustering, cloud, and containers.
The customer support is good; whenever we have opened a case, they have provided detailed explanations of the issues and resolutions.
I rate the customer service 10 out of 10 because SUSE has 24/7 availability support, extended support, security, multi-Linux distribution support, upgradation, and everything is user-friendly.
If you go through a partner who sells or supports Windows, the support could be around seven out of ten, because Windows relies on these partners for assistance.
Microsoft's technical support for Windows Server has been lacking, with rare responses even with premium support.
They resolved our problems within the defined SLA.
Its scalability is quite good since we are using Azure, which allows us to easily scale up or down our resources as needed.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is widely recognized for its strong scalability, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to global enterprises.
I've worked in companies with 20,000 to 100,000 users, and it scales beautifully without issues.
The solution is used extensively in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.
We use it everywhere, and it serves approximately two thousand users in our company as a backend service.
When HANA is utilized by many applications, I notice that while utilization does increase, we have never faced lagging or server unresponsiveness.
I would rate stability for SUSE Linux Enterprise an eight out of ten.
We have experienced no blue screens or crashes and often achieved an uptime of 2,000 to 3,000 days without any issues whatsoever.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
I rate the stability a 9 out of 10.
Security is a top concern, and further strengthening default security policies, simplifying compliance management, and integrating advanced vulnerability management tools would be a valuable improvement.
The software manager was different, making it challenging to install certain applications.
The license we subscribed to should carry over within the same instance family.
From a security perspective, sometimes, malware attacks and hackers take advantage of the tool's vulnerabilities.
Deploying antivirus and firewall software on the server is advisable, but having an external firewall adds an extra layer of security.
Windows Server needs to improve its speed and stability.
Upgrading an instance results in overlapping or double subscription fees.
I would rate pricing for SUSE Linux Enterprise considering one is a high price and ten is a low price.
The licensing cost is a bit high.
It is quite expensive.
Previously, a Windows Server with two processors cost around two 154 euros annually, but now it is estimated to be around 3,000 to 4,000 euros for the same configuration.
On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I rate it ten out of ten.
SUSE Linux had a clean user interface, which was a valuable feature for me.
It has a stable and reliable OS.
The LVM is very easy to configure, along with simple disk scanning compared to other systems.
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that every Microsoft product is scalable, flexible, secure, and available on a certain budget.
The IP directory is the most valuable feature.
I can manage the firewalls on the server easily, open or close ports to manage security traffic, and use encryption on the hard disk to keep data secure.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Windows Server | 9.3% |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise | 5.4% |
| Other | 85.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 78 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 41 |
| Large Enterprise | 88 |
SUSE Linux Enterprise offers features like YaST for server management, seamless integration with Oracle and SAP, and a robust security setup. Renowned for stability, it efficiently supports workstations, SAP workloads, and cloud migrations across diverse industries.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is known for its lightweight design, high performance, and ease of installation. Its flexible architecture supports extensive documentation and efficient patching. The system uses the BTRFS file system for effective virtualization, and community support is significant. However, challenges include package updates causing conflicts, difficult initial setup and software management, high pricing, and support response times. Improvements in security compliance, cloud integration, hardware compatibility, and documentation are also needed.
What are SUSE Linux Enterprise's important features?
What benefits should users expect from using SUSE Linux Enterprise?
Industries like healthcare and banking use SUSE Linux Enterprise for secure transactions and structured application deployment. It is also a choice for organizations involved in testing, automation, and web development, offering support for SAP HANA integration and facilitating cloud migrations.
Windows Server offers enterprise-grade solutions with Active Directory, Hyper-V, and Azure integration. Known for its user-friendliness and stability, it is ideal for hosting applications and managing domains, promising scalability and seamless network management across environments.
Windows Server is integral for businesses needing reliable infrastructure for server virtualization and enterprise application deployment. It excels in integrating with Microsoft applications, providing robust support for database hosting, Active Directory management, and remote access. Users benefit from its comprehensive features supporting intense workloads, virtual setups, and efficient domain management. However, it could improve its port security, vulnerability monitoring, and interface intuitiveness. Pricing models also require adjustments to be competitive, and better integration with Linux would enhance system compatibility. Regular updates can impact stability, and the command-line interface could be more efficient compared to Linux.
What are Windows Server's key features?Windows Server is implemented across industries for virtual server hosting, enterprise application deployment, and managing complex IT infrastructures. Organizations use it for database hosting, Active Directory management, and leveraging Microsoft's ecosystem, supporting backend operations and enhancing communication security.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.