SwaggerHub vs webMethods.io comparison

SmartBear and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. SmartBear is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. SmartBear holds a 1.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

SwaggerHub

Read 10 SwaggerHub reviews

1,551 Views
1,551 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,897 Views
2,771 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

SwaggerHub and webMethods.io are competitor products in the API management and integration solutions space. SwaggerHub takes the lead in user-friendliness, thanks to its intuitive design, while webMethods.io excels in comprehensive integration capabilities suited for complex enterprise needs.

Features: SwaggerHub provides robust API documentation and collaboration tools that enhance the communication within development teams. Its design-first approach supports seamless workflows. On the other hand, webMethods.io offers a wide array of integration features, facilitating the connection of multiple cloud and on-premises applications. Its extensive connectors make it adaptable to complex systems.

Room for Improvement: SwaggerHub could enhance its feature set to accommodate more diverse use cases, improve integration options, and offer better customization capabilities. webMethods.io can work on simplifying its complex integration environment, enhance its user interface, and streamline its configuration processes to improve accessibility for non-enterprise users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SwaggerHub offers an easy and straightforward deployment process focusing on providing effective support. webMethods.io, although more intricate in deployment, offers a strong customer support network that assists with large-scale integrations, ensuring users are guided through more complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: SwaggerHub is cost-effective and aims for rapid deployment, offering a quicker ROI for smaller projects. In contrast, webMethods.io justifies higher initial costs with its extensive suite of features and potential for significant ROI in enterprises that require scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,679 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

SwaminathanSubramanian

Director/Enterprise Solutions Architect, Technology Advisor at Kyndryl

Facilitating enterprise-wide API governance and management

Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account. The scalability also needs enhancement, as it becomes flaky under increased load. Additionally, the versioning management could be improved to be on par with source code management tools.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"The scalability is endless."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"It is a stable solution."

More SwaggerHub pros

"The stability is good."

"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."

"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."

"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

More SwaggerHub cons

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."

"Support is expensive."

"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"It could be more user-friendly."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

"The tool is cheap."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SwaggerHub?

The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I started using SwaggerHub in its previous version, SmartMiner, with a tool called SoapUI. I used it to create mock web services to test web services and create test scripts and mock APIs. This usa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub

Compared 24% of the time

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 18% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 9% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

IBM API Connect vs SwaggerHub

Compared 4% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

July 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SwaggerHub vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.