Microsoft Azure API Management vs SwaggerHub comparison

Microsoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.6. Microsoft holds a 19.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 80 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

25,594 Views
21,392 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 10 SwaggerHub reviews

2,076 Views
1,601 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and SwaggerHub are competing in the API management category. Microsoft Azure API Management is favored for extensive features and support, while SwaggerHub shines in API design and documentation capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management offers robust integration, scaling, and monitoring tools, making it suitable for large-scale enterprises. SwaggerHub excels in collaborative features, intuitive design workspace, and robust documentation, catering to API-focused teams.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could simplify its complexity for easier use in smaller setups and enhance UI intuitiveness. Improvements in SwaggerHub could include expanding scalability options, better integration capabilities, and offering more comprehensive enterprise-level functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management requires complex setup but provides strong technical support, facilitating deployments especially in enterprise environments. SwaggerHub offers simpler deployments and responsive support, appealing to smaller teams and new market entrants.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management's higher setup costs align with its enterprise-level features, providing strong ROI for large organizations. SwaggerHub, with moderate pricing, offers good ROI for teams focusing on API design efficiency and targeted management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 19.1%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian

Specialist PCC at Danfoss

Efficiently manages and monetizes API

It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.

Read full review

SwaminathanSubramanian

Director/Enterprise Solutions Architect, Technology Advisor at Kyndryl

Facilitating enterprise-wide API governance and management

Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account. The scalability also needs enhancement, as it becomes flaky under increased load. Additionally, the versioning management could be improved to be on par with source code management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the integration of CI/CD with the API gateway."

"The Azure Active Directory Synchronization is quite good."

"I like that security features can be integrated with API Management. I also like that you can perform rate-limiting and throttling functions."

"The Application Gateway we have found to be the most useful in Microsoft Azure API Management. We have integrated the Microsoft Azure API Management with Application Gateway. Application Gateway is a type of load balancer that we are using for the high availability of our API calls."

"Microsoft Azure API Management is better because it has a DevOps integration by default."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is monitoring. When compared with Apigee, I prefer Microsoft Azure API Management."

"The ease of setting up a new solution is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up a new solution and to deploy it to production."

"We're pretty much using all of the monetizations features out of the API manager so we can put up a portal and have a dev portal and then a prod portal and do rate limiting."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

More SwaggerHub pros

Cons

"It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature."

"Microsoft Azure API Management is lagging behind Apigee and should also have a better CICD process."

"Some of the DevOps stuff could be easier to work with. The migration paths are a little complicated, and moving code around could be more seamless. There should be less manual migration when several teams work together to publish code to the DevOps."

"I rate the technical support from Microsoft Azure API Management a four out of five."

"The hybrid part could be improved because API Management is entirely cloud-based, but some of our resources are on-prem, so formatting is an issue. Our goal is dual implementation."

"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."

"From my understanding, there are some constraints around governance and service-to-service intercommunication managing priorities and our own governance."

"If I compare this solution to others I have used in other phases of my life, having APIM being an Azure resource, it is easy to configure and deploy. However, this conversely reduced the flexibility. The difficulty is how do we configure it in a manner that a larger enterprise would probably want it to be. This creates a bit more complexity, working around the constraints of the resource itself. If comparing it to other solutions, it is more of a legacy design with an older approach. The various level components are still around resembling an on-premise type of design similar to other solutions, such as Apigee or Mulesoft. They are still predominantly carrying some legacy design. Which might be suited for organizations where they have a more complex network layout. APIM is easy to deploy, but on the other side of that, it is constrained to how Azure has designed it to be."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"The scalability aspect of SwaggerHub can be improved. It becomes a bit unreliable when the load is increased and isn't up to par with expectations for scalability."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

More SwaggerHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."

"I would describe the tool's price as being in the mid-range category."

"Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for the medium and small."

"It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, it's around $3.50 per user per month. If you want a DevOps integration, it's about $7.50 per user per month. Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all three flavors for $7.50 per user per month."

"There are no additional costs above the main license."

"It's an expensive solution"

"Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

"The tool is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about SwaggerHub?

The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I started using SwaggerHub in its previous version, SmartMiner, with a tool called SoapUI. I used it to create mock web services to test web services and create test scripts and mock APIs. This usa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 44% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 23% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs SwaggerHub

Compared 22% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SwaggerHub

Compared 9% of the time

Stoplight vs SwaggerHub

Compared 8% of the time

Postman vs SwaggerHub

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs SwaggerHub

Compared 5% of the time

More SwaggerHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

March 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

March 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.