Postman Enterprise vs SwaggerHub comparison

Postman and SmartBear are both solutions in the API Management category. Postman is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while SmartBear is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Postman holds a 1.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to SmartBear’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Postman users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Postman Enterprise

Read 65 Postman Enterprise reviews

4,193 Views
1,132 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SwaggerHub

Read 12 SwaggerHub reviews

1,449 Views
1,449 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Postman Enterprise

SwaggerHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

SwaggerHub and Postman Enterprise operate within the competitive API development and management sector. Postman Enterprise surpasses SwaggerHub in feature richness, making it more suitable for complex API workflows.

Features: SwaggerHub emphasizes collaborative API design, comprehensive documentation tools, and ease of integration with third-party applications. Postman Enterprise provides advanced API testing capabilities, integrated monitoring features, and extensive automation support for robust API lifecycle management.

Room for Improvement: SwaggerHub could benefit from enhanced testing capabilities, expanded feature sets for API lifecycle management, and improved integration with diverse development ecosystems. Postman Enterprise might require a more user-friendly initial setup, better guidance for organizations transitioning from simpler tools, and streamlined deployment for less technical teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SwaggerHub provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment with reliable support. Postman Enterprise offers both cloud and on-premises options, though its extensive features can pose initial setup challenges. Customer service for both platforms is strong, but Postman's flexibility may demand more technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: SwaggerHub's competitive pricing offers a good balance of features, yielding solid ROI for teams focused on API design and collaboration. Postman Enterprise, despite a higher price, delivers excellent ROI for businesses seeking comprehensive API management and advanced testing, justifying its overall value with its premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Postman Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (7th)

SwaggerHub

Ranking in API Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Postman Enterprise is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwaggerHub is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Postman Enterprise	1.5%
SwaggerHub	1.5%
Other	97.0%

API Management

Featured Reviews

TOMISLAV SOKAC

API Integration Engineer at Airbnb

Automated testing optimizes API workflow and collaboration

Since I am using the free tier, one improvement would be to increase the number of requests you can send in a short time period. Currently, if I send 200-300 requests in a short period, Postman Enterprise requires a 30-second wait before sending another bundle of requests unless you upgrade to a higher tier. Secondly, Postman Enterprise sometimes takes several minutes to load the whole workspace. With 2,000-3,000 requests in a workspace, it can take a minute or two to load all requests. When creating a new workspace and moving requests between workspaces, depending on internet speed, it can take a longer period to copy those requests or workspace from one place to another.

Read full review

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Has streamlined API documentation and integration workflows across cross-functional teams

Documenting SwaggerHub has a standard and consistent structure of API definitions, and it automatically generates interactive documentation which helps the developers to understand everything. There are certain areas where SwaggerHub can go beyond here as formatting options for documentation pages are restricted, and the import and export options of API collections are complex in SwaggerHub. It provides various collaboration tools where we can work and do it. The strong validation against the API maintains conformity and reduces errors. That part is very great in SwaggerHub. Overall, scalability and stability-wise, it varies high compared to the competitors, but there are still certain areas where competitors are providing various customizations. SwaggerHub can understand those aspects and implement them as well. The complex import and export of API calls and collaborations can be challenging in SwaggerHub. If they can make it easier for us, that would be great. Their performance is degraded if there is too much load on the API. The customization and doc formatting options for documentation pages are restricted in SwaggerHub. A few of my teammates have complained that they find the UI unintuitive where it requires multiple clicks for simple tasks. SwaggerHub is a great tool, but these limitations can be addressed to make things better and easier.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product deserves an eight out of ten."

"It is beneficial to have flexibility, especially with API chaining."

"The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution."

"Postman helps us to automate the API testing in the team."

"Postman lets you create, manage, and validate a suite of tests. It has several features to help you organize your test suite. You can also automate stuff with a lot of validations and assertions. Postman supports GraphQL, and you can do various kinds of calls."

"The most valuable feature is that JavaScript can be included as tests."

"The most valuable feature is the user interface because it provides a clear space for the URL, headers, body, prerequisites, and tests."

"I can use multiple environments, which allows me to create environment variables for each endpoint."

Cons

"The product lacks a good console."

"Should have a more improved easy-to-use interface."

"The solution is quite complex partly because the UI needs simplification."

"One area that could be better is collection management."

"One thing which Postman needs to improve is the documentation. The documentation of Postman is not that great when compared to other tools."

"We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB."

"I was not even aware that it was possible to automate tasks in Postman...Some features related to the automation of tasks need to be added to the solution."

"If we have a certain build on one machine it won't work with another build even if we are using the same URL. It would give us a connection refuse. So developing environment compatibility would make it better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has moderate pricing."

"This is an open source solution."

"We use the open-source version. They introduced a new licensing model where your company must subscribe to their services if you're using it for business purposes. However, I think they charge too much if you're only using the basic features. It limits what your organization can do if you're not a paying customer."

"I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."

"Postman is an open-source product. It is free to download from Google."

"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."

"It is free."

"The solution has a licensing fee which might be prohibitive."

More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"The tool is cheap."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	41

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Postman?

The product is easy to implement.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Postman is much cheaper than the other tools. I am not aware of the current pricing for Postman because that's taken care of by the client; we just pay and they simply create options. On a per-pers...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SwaggerHub?

In SwaggerHub, I appreciate that it is a powerful platform for API design and collaboration, but currently, the access control is somewhat limited. I would love to see enhanced permissions allowing...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SwaggerHub?

I have worked for Arden University, University of Sheffield, and Nanyang Technological University. For those institutions, I used Amazon AppStream for backend validations. When working for Prolific...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SwaggerHub?

Based on my limited experience with SwaggerHub, I can share a few practical recommendations for implementing it effectively. Before onboarding multiple teams, it's important to define naming conven...

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise

December 2025

Download Postman Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

SwaggerHub

December 2025

Download SwaggerHub product report

Overview

Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.

What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

Postman

SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera

Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

December 2025

Free Report: Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Postman Enterprise vs. SwaggerHub report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.