Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Postman users mostly rely on documentation and community, with mixed reviews on support responsiveness and effectiveness.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.7
Postman users seek enhanced automation, intuitive interface, improved integrations, better pricing, and advanced testing features for performance support.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Something that could be better is the inclusion of another type of test, for example, end-to-end tests.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.5
Postman is scalable for large teams, but performance issues under heavy load suggest the need for additional testing tools.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Postman's flexible pricing offers free and licensed options, praised for cost-effectiveness and competitive plans for enterprise customers.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
The price is low, making it a reasonable price for the product.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Postman is stable and reliable with minor issues in connection, RAM usage, and improved browser-based performance.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
Postman offers a user-friendly interface, automation, API compatibility, automated testing, and flexible sharing, boosting productivity and accessibility.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
In Postman, we have collections that contain multiple endpoints that I can test.
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft API Manager
Ranking in API Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Postman
Ranking in API Management
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Dipanjan_Nandi - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable testing stubs and policy enforcement with room for better security and cost management
From an API management perspective, MuleSoft's API Manager is not as powerful as some other tools available. Features like monetization and advanced security, which are present in Apigee, are missing. I also want the API Manager to be used as a separate product apart from MuleSoft's other integration solutions. Additionally, the licensing cost is high, and many clients are looking to switch due to this.
Raghvendra Jyothi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network
There is a product called Guidewire that sends the data in an XML format. It's like a policy load. That information we trigger in Kafka. Kafka will take the information and send it to the REST API. With Kafka, they wanted to make two APIs to consolidate the effort. At that time, we are using the POST API tool. This tool is helping us to synchronize everything.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?
I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...
What do you like most about Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies.
How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
What do you like most about Postman?
The product is easy to implement.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
Postman is economical and is considered to be rather cheap compared to other software solutions.
 

Also Known As

Anypoint API Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva
PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft API Manager vs. Postman and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.