Telerik Test Studio vs Testim comparison

Progress Software and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #24, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. Progress Software holds a 1.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,024 Views
655 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Telerik Test Studio and Testim are competing in the test automation space. Testim is perceived as the superior choice for advanced features and strategic technology integration, while Telerik Test Studio stands out for its affordability and comprehensive support.

Features: Telerik Test Studio is recognized for robust script creation and maintenance, supporting a wide range of technologies, and versatile testing capabilities. Testim excels in AI-driven testing, ensuring intelligent test stability, quick test creation, scalability, and integration with CI/CD pipelines.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could enhance its AI capabilities, cloud integration, and user interface modernization. Testim might benefit from more competitive pricing, enhanced customer support options, and improved traditional deployment models for specific customer needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio offers a traditional deployment model with substantial support options, aiding in a smooth setup experience. Testim provides cloud-based deployment, offering flexibility and rapid implementation, making it adaptable to changing project environments with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio offers moderately priced options delivering significant ROI through its comprehensive features. Testim, with its higher initial cost, shows greater ROI through AI capabilities and efficient test management, focusing on long-term value for organizations seeking advanced automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (22nd), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"It is a highly stable solution."

More Testim pros

Cons

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 37% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 8% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 51% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

March 2025

Download Testim product report

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim

February 2025

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.