Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

TIBCO tibbr vs Yammer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO tibbr
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
21st
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Yammer
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
4th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of TIBCO tibbr is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Yammer is 6.4%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user153219 - PeerSpot reviewer
Full featured mobile app for every OS is a valuable feature but more customizable features would be an improvement
We previously used Yammer. We changed because the flat groups structure is difficult to use when there are some hundreds of group, and so people don't easily find the group they are searching for and create another group that (sometimes partially) duplicates the scope of an existing group. This way of working isn't good enough.
PrashantSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps users to reach out to others in the organization and enables seamless collaboration
Yammer is a good tool. My previous organization used it extensively. Pretty much everything had a Yammer channel. If someone outside the team had questions, they could just come up and ask questions using the product. Asking questions and posting things are the most important features. If we run into an issue and a team owns the product, we can just use the solution to ask questions and get responses from that team. Otherwise, we will be stuck in a loop forever to figure it out. In a large company, we can get stuck if we don't know who to contact to determine what is happening and why. The product was integrated into Microsoft Teams. We could collaborate easily. There are so many things we can do with Teams. So, the collaboration is at a different level when we use Microsoft products like Teams and Yammer, along with other tools that come with the suite. The solution worked well for me. I did not face anything that would make me stop using it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8913 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2013
Yammer vs. SP Social in 2013
There are several discussions on SharePoint’s social strategy going on at the moment. I had some great discussions with my MVP mate Adis during Summit last week. Since #SPC12 almost every SharePoint addicted developer, it-pro, power user has reviewed Yammer. If you don’t know what Yammer is, here a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Yammer?
We can send out notifications and ask questions using Yammer.
What needs improvement with Yammer?
Sometimes, we lose access to the solution for unknown reasons.
What is your primary use case for Yammer?
Yammer was mainly a communication site my company used to provide information about internal events.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

tibbr
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

InterPortPolice, Thomson Reuters, Wingstop
Verizon, Rakuten,Nationwide, DHL, Westfield, Telefonica, 7-Eleven, Red Robin, Intuit, eBay,Darden, Suncorp, Tyco, Xerox, and ModCloth.
Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO tibbr vs. Yammer and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.