Toad Data Point vs webMethods.io comparison

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"With Toad Data Point, I can automate most steps automatically."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

"We love it."

"The best thing about it is its automation features."

"I have never experienced any issues with customer service."

"One of the greatest features is that you can get data from anywhere to anywhere with Toad Data Point."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"The developer portal is a valuable feature."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."

"It is a very stable product."

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"Understanding the overall architecture is difficult."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"​Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"It is difficult to maintain."

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."