Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Contrast Security Protect Logo

Top 10 Contrast Security Protect Alternatives

Vendor: Contrast Security
4.2 out of 5
307 followers
Post review

Top Contrast Security Protect Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Contrast Security Protect based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Veracode, and Snyk. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Contrast Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Contrast Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Contrast Security Protect Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Server excels in static code analysis and CI/CD integration, ideal for quality-focused teams. In contrast, Contrast Security Protect offers real-time vulnerability detection, appealing to those prioritizing security, despite a higher price, due to superior customer service and deployment ease.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
SonarQube Server's setup cost is generally lower and incurs fewer initial expenses compared to Contrast Security Protect, which often involves higher setup costs, reflecting the complexity and additional features provided by Contrast Security Protect.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Server's setup cost is generally lower and incurs fewer initial expenses compared to Contrast Security Protect, which often involves higher setup costs, reflecting the complexity and additional features provided by Contrast Security Protect.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Veracode offers extensive security testing and detailed analytics, appealing to businesses focused on vulnerability coverage. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect provides real-time threat detection and seamless deployment, ideal for dynamic environments. Veracode's robust insights attract enterprises, while Contrast Security Protect's agility suits fast-paced settings.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Veracode Report
Veracode offers a straightforward setup with fewer costs, whereas Contrast Security Protect involves a more complex and potentially expensive setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode offers a straightforward setup with fewer costs, whereas Contrast Security Protect involves a more complex and potentially expensive setup process.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect excels in affordability and real-time threat assessment. In comparison, Snyk offers seamless integration with developer workflows and advanced open-source vulnerability scanning. Tech buyers might choose one for cost-effective security or the other for comprehensive development ecosystem integration.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Snyk Report
Contrast Security Protect offers competitive setup costs, while Snyk provides a flexible pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Protect offers competitive setup costs, while Snyk provides a flexible pricing model.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One excels in pricing and integration, appealing to those seeking seamless development tool compatibility. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect stands out for real-time protection and advanced security features, attracting users who prioritize immediate threat detection despite higher initial investments.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Contrast Security Protect Report
Checkmarx One offers a straightforward setup cost that is typically lower, while Contrast Security Protect involves a more complex, higher setup cost. This distinction highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One offers a straightforward setup cost that is typically lower, while Contrast Security Protect involves a more complex, higher setup cost. This distinction highlights a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect is favored for ease of deployment and real-time monitoring, offering seamless integration. In comparison, Mend.io provides comprehensive features with extensive vulnerability detection and management, offering a broader scope of protection. Contrast Security Protect is valued for its affordability, while Mend.io offers justified ROI.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Mend.io Report
Contrast Security Protect offers a significant initial setup cost advantage, whereas Mend.io involves a more substantial setup investment, highlighting a crucial difference in upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Protect offers a significant initial setup cost advantage, whereas Mend.io involves a more substantial setup investment, highlighting a crucial difference in upfront expenses.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
Fortify on Demand offers flexible integration and robust static application security testing, appealing to buyers valuing ease of deployment. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect attracts those needing real-time threat detection and runtime application self-protection for advanced security in development pipelines.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Fortify on Demand Report
Fortify on Demand has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers lower initial expenses, making Contrast Security Protect more cost-efficient in terms of setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify on Demand has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers lower initial expenses, making Contrast Security Protect more cost-efficient in terms of setup.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect effectively offers real-time threat detection and seamless workflow integration. In comparison, Sonatype Lifecycle shines in comprehensive open-source component analysis. A tech buyer might choose Contrast for straightforward deployment, while Sonatype appeals for detailed open-source management. Contrast offers attractive costs; Sonatype provides extensive features.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report
Contrast Security Protect offers more competitive setup cost advantages compared to Sonatype Lifecycle, which incurs higher implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Protect offers more competitive setup cost advantages compared to Sonatype Lifecycle, which incurs higher implementation expenses.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Acunetix excels in vulnerability detection for diverse web applications, attracting users focused on scanning capabilities. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect offers real-time protection and easy integration into development workflows, appealing to buyers investing in protection seamlessly integrated throughout the development process.
Download Acunetix vs. Contrast Security Protect Report
Acunetix has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Protect, offering more budget-friendly initial expenditure. Contrast Security Protect, however, requires a higher setup investment, potentially delivering advanced security features and additional benefits.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix has a lower setup cost compared to Contrast Security Protect, offering more budget-friendly initial expenditure. Contrast Security Protect, however, requires a higher setup investment, potentially delivering advanced security features and additional benefits.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan offers comprehensive scanning and integration for vulnerability assessments, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect focuses on real-time threat detection and seamless deployment, attracting those seeking efficient security with a quicker ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan requires a significant upfront setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This highlights a clear distinction in upfront investment between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires a significant upfront setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This highlights a clear distinction in upfront investment between the two security solutions.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.9 out of 5
Qualys Web Application Scanning attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness, vulnerability detection, and cloud integration. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect offers advanced features like interactive testing and runtime protection, appealing to those requiring comprehensive security, adaptive capabilities, and strong customer support for larger enterprises.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs lower setup costs compared to Contrast Security Protect, highlighting a cost disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys Web Application Scanning incurs lower setup costs compared to Contrast Security Protect, highlighting a cost disparity between the two solutions.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
3.8 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect offers seamless integration and runtime protection with competitive pricing. In comparison, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides comprehensive scanning features with strong vulnerability detection, justifying higher upfront costs. Both have distinct strengths depending on integration needs and budget considerations.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report
Contrast Security Protect has minimal setup costs, making it attractive for quick deployment, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive feature package and market positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Protect has minimal setup costs, making it attractive for quick deployment, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive feature package and market positioning.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Fortify Application Defender
3.9 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect excels in real-time vulnerability protection and integration. In comparison, Fortify Application Defender delivers robust security analytics and detailed reporting. Contrast offers competitive pricing with effective protection, while Fortify provides extensive features for those seeking advanced security measures.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. Fortify Application Defender Report
Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective setup, while Fortify Application Defender incurs higher initial expenses. The primary difference lies in the upfront investment required for implementing each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective setup, while Fortify Application Defender incurs higher initial expenses. The primary difference lies in the upfront investment required for implementing each solution.
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Sqreen
1 out of 5
Contrast Security Protect Logo
Sqreen
1 out of 5

Sqreen is the industry’s first provider of Application Security Management (ASM), unifying application security needs into one single platform, giving over 500 companies unprecedented visibility and protection in production. Sqreen enables developers, operations and security teams to scale their security without impacting engineering velocity. The company was founded by security veterans who previously led the offensive security team at Apple. Sqreen is backed by Greylock Partners, Y Combinator, Alven and Point Nine. For more information,

View comparison

Related categories

Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Development Analytics