Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ExtremeControl Logo

Top 10 ExtremeControl Alternatives

Vendor: Extreme
3.9 out of 5
1,048 followers
Start review

Top ExtremeControl Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ExtremeControl based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass, and Forescout Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ExtremeControl surpasses its competitors by offering advanced network access control, comprehensive policy enforcement, and seamless integration with existing infrastructures, ensuring unmatched security, scalability, and user experience in complex and dynamic IT environments.

Extreme Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Extreme, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ExtremeControl Logo
ExtremeControl Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
4.1 out of 5
Cisco ISE offers extensive integration and robust security features, appealing to complex environments. In comparison, ExtremeControl's simplicity and intuitive controls make it an attractive option for those prioritizing ease of deployment and network insights. Tech buyers may choose based on complexity or cost-effectiveness.
Download Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs. ExtremeControl Report
The setup cost for Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is generally reported as high, while ExtremeControl is viewed as having a moderate setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is generally reported as high, while ExtremeControl is viewed as having a moderate setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
ExtremeControl Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
ExtremeControl Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Aruba ClearPass attracts buyers with its extensive integration capabilities, enhancing third-party application management. In comparison, ExtremeControl appeals with its seamless scalability for large networks. ClearPass offers user-friendly deployment, while ExtremeControl requires technical expertise, making it ideal for those prioritizing network scalability.
Download Aruba ClearPass vs. ExtremeControl Report
Aruba ClearPass offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, while ExtremeControl features a complex installation requiring additional resources. ClearPass is easier to implement compared to ExtremeControl, which demands more time and expertise for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Aruba ClearPass offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, while ExtremeControl features a complex installation requiring additional resources. ClearPass is easier to implement compared to ExtremeControl, which demands more time and expertise for setup.
ExtremeControl Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
ExtremeControl Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform offers extensive device visibility and real-time intelligence, making it ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, ExtremeControl excels with network access control and integration capabilities. Forescout's higher cost aligns with robust security, while ExtremeControl attracts tech buyers with competitive pricing.
Download ExtremeControl vs. Forescout Platform Report
Forescout Platform offers a higher setup cost compared to ExtremeControl, which appeals to users seeking an affordable initial investment. ExtremeControl provides a cost-effective setup, contrasting with Forescout's premium expense for users prioritizing comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform offers a higher setup cost compared to ExtremeControl, which appeals to users seeking an affordable initial investment. ExtremeControl provides a cost-effective setup, contrasting with Forescout's premium expense for users prioritizing comprehensive security features.
ExtremeControl Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.8 out of 5
ExtremeControl Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiNAC excels with competitive pricing and efficient IoT management. In comparison, ExtremeControl offers advanced network capabilities like extensive visibility and automation. Fortinet FortiNAC appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while ExtremeControl satisfies organizations prioritizing network functionality despite higher costs.
Download ExtremeControl vs. Fortinet FortiNAC Report
Fortinet FortiNAC features an average setup cost, while ExtremeControl incurs higher costs, highlighting FortiNAC's cost-effectiveness. These differences are significant when considering initial investments for network control solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiNAC features an average setup cost, while ExtremeControl incurs higher costs, highlighting FortiNAC's cost-effectiveness. These differences are significant when considering initial investments for network control solutions.
ExtremeControl Logo
ExtremeControl Logo
Sophos Network Access Control
4.2 out of 5
ExtremeControl provides advanced integrations and sophisticated analytics, appealing to organizations seeking robust security. In comparison, Sophos Network Access Control offers cost-effective pricing and seamless deployment, making it attractive to buyers prioritizing budget and ease of use.
Download ExtremeControl vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report
Sophos Network Access Control has a higher setup cost compared to ExtremeControl, offering distinct pricing advantages for budget-conscious organizations choosing between these network solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Network Access Control has a higher setup cost compared to ExtremeControl, offering distinct pricing advantages for budget-conscious organizations choosing between these network solutions.

Related categories

Network Access Control (NAC)
Cisco Security Portfolio
IoT Security