Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Solutions Architect - Telecom & Network Infrastructure at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Provides excellent load balancing and a simple deployment
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has good load balancing capabilities."
  • "An expensive solution for the minimal features we use."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution as a proxy to our websites, load balancing all our servers as clients come onto our website and use our services. Our website provides around 15 different services. We are customers of F5 and I'm a solutions architect for telecom and network infrastructure.

What is most valuable?

The load balancing aspect is valuable to us. 

What needs improvement?

We use a limited amount of features so the biggest issue for us is the price. For what we're using, it's an expensive solution. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using this solution for 12 years. 

Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable and scales easily. Our networking team deals with the maintenance.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. We had external help for implementation and I believe deployment took about two days. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate this solution a nine out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
IT Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Helps us recognize sessions from certain IPs that are authorized to manage our application
Pros and Cons
  • "It helps us recognize sessions from certain IPs that are authorized to manage the application. This is a function we haven't found anywhere else."
  • "The most helpful thing is that it's open-source. It's very easy to program and customize."
  • "Logging is a bit of a problem. Logging and monitoring are only in plain text. You have to search and you have to know what you are searching for to find anything. So of course, monitoring and getting alerts for abnormal situations is hard. There are no tools for monitoring and alerts"

What is our primary use case?

We use it as an LTM and as a reverse proxy to publish web services.

How has it helped my organization?

It helps us recognize sessions from certain IPs that are authorized to manage the application. This is a function we haven't found anywhere else.

What is most valuable?

The most helpful thing is that it's open-source. It's very easy to program and customize.

What needs improvement?

Logging is a bit of a problem. Logging and monitoring are only in plain text. You have to search and you have to know what you are searching for to find anything. So of course, monitoring and getting alerts for abnormal situations is hard. There are no tools for monitoring and alerts. If you have problems and you need to diagnose them, you really have to know what you're looking for in order to find it.

Logging and monitoring could be something out-of-the-box that are more accessible.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is one of the advantages. It's very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't bumped into scalability issues. The limitation is actually through licensing. Throughput is limited by licensing. We had an error with the license and we reached the limit but we fixed that. But there has never been trouble with the capacity or scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have never used technical support directly. I use F5 through integration services and there were a few times they didn't know how to resolve an issue and they had to turn to support. But there were answers every time.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Microsoft Gateway called CMG. This product was end-of-life, they decided to kill the product. We switched because there is no other solution that does the same thing.

How was the initial setup?

It was complex compared to the Microsoft system. But after we learned the product and understood how it works, it worked seamlessly.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We only use a fraction of the capabilities of F5. There are different modules that we have heard others speak highly of, but we don't want to use them locally. It's an on-premise server. For example, there is a WAF (web application firewall) model and others that we don't use. 

It's not a cheap product, but there are no other replacements for what we do with it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We checked other options, but nothing could deliver the solution we need.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise excessive testing before moving to production. It's a new product, it's a "language." You have to learn the product thoroughly before you really can implement it.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Works at FiSC
User
Global DNS, Link Controller, and Server Load Balancer provide our company service with high availability. Internet and cloud support could be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "Valuable features include Link Controller and Server Load Balancer."
  • "Internet and cloud support could be improved."
  • "Security enhancement should be more user friendly."

What is our primary use case?

GTM and LTM are the primary uses of the solution. Our company has two active data centers and a data center that is being activated. F5 BIG-IP helps us a lot. 

How has it helped my organization?

Global DNS, Link Controller, and Server Load Balancer provide our company service with high availability.

What is most valuable?

Valuable features include Link Controller and Server Load Balancer with cloud support and application enhancement security.

What needs improvement?

Internet and cloud support could be improved. Security enhancement should be more user friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user850398 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Versatile, easy to use; the iRule feature is key for me
Pros and Cons
  • "If I were to choose one key feature in particular, perhaps it would be the iRule feature. It’s a really versatile tool."
  • "The SharePoint SSO part has some room for improvement."

How has it helped my organization?

Previously we had an IdP on a Linux server. However, this was a pain to configure. With the F5 this has become easy. Therefore, more and more of our applications are now transferred to SAML.

What is most valuable?

I really like the ease of use of it in general. If I were to choose one in particular, perhaps it would be the iRule feature. It’s a really versatile tool.

What needs improvement?

The SharePoint SSO part has some room for improvement. Opening documents and spreadsheets on local applications in on our specific situation is not possible.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

F5 is a big company. They have a great community and TAC. The advantage with this product is that it isn't new. They have many engineers who have been working with it for a long time and have a lot of experience.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used to have a Barracuda WAF. It was unreliable and it didn’t have all the features of the F5. It was out of maintenance and we decided never to use Barracuda again.

How was the initial setup?

Easy switch from our Barracuda to F5. The setup was done with an engineer. However, if you pay good attention you can manage it afterwards. I also have a F5 test environment on a VM. These cost around $100 but are worth that money for testing purposes.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We tried FortiADC briefly. However the big contender was Citrix NetScaler.

What other advice do I have?

Be sure of what you will use. F5 isn’t cheap but is worth the price. Also, take a good look at all the different options and make sure you take the correct hardware platform. You can always add more licenses, but if the physical device isn’t up to the task you’re stuck.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Very stable and easy to use with a good GUI
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very easy to use and easy to understand. It's quite an intuitive system."
  • "Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future."

What is our primary use case?

Mostly I support my clients in relation to the product.

What is most valuable?

I am very satisfied with the product overall. 

There is never a big number of false positives or false negatives. That's the most valuable aspect of the product. 

The solution is very easy to use and easy to understand. It's quite an intuitive system.

The user interface and GUI are very good.

I find the product to be very stable. I've supported customers for two years and haven't really had an issue with the solution.

What needs improvement?

I can't say that there are any features missing. I've overall been quite happy with it.

We once had an issue related to trying to publish some exchange application to a file and we experienced some problems there, however, the incident was not really related to BIG-IP. It was likely some kind of infrastructure problem the company was experiencing.

We haven't had any big problems of note.

Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future.

The pricing could be more reasonable.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for about two years at this point. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had an issue in years. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. It's reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Most of our clients are medium-sized entities.

For the one customer I typically deal with, there has been no need to scale or expand services. The product can be scaled by adding more licenses if necessary. That said, our clients have everything they need and have not actually done this. 

There are also add-ons that come from the ASM if a company is interested in that.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is slow and it could be faster. I had one issue once that was not very serious as it was on the Disaster Recovery Site. We were able to pull a previous version from a snapshot. However, the issue was that I was able to solve the problem myself before I even heard back from technical support. If they knew their technology, how is it that I could solve the problem faster as a person that's not as familiar with it? They need to be much faster. It could have been a much bigger problem. 

I'd say, overall, we aren't satisfied with the technical support for that reason.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different product. This is my first Application Delivery Consult Solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very complex. The basic setup may be fine, however, right now I'm trying to do something in my lab environment. We've tried a few things over the years and it hasn't gotten any easier.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The costs could be lower. In a report, we found that Citrix Solutions are somehow cheaper - including in relation to encryption licensing. I cannot compare as I haven't spoken to Citrix. I don't know if it's easier or has the same (or more features). That said, I wouldn't describe this product as cheap. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We're currently comparing F5 to Citrix. I'm not currently working with Citrix; I'm curious to see how they compare to each other. I had a presentation to a client and they just wanted some sort of comparison, which is why I began to look at Citrix.

What other advice do I have?

We are resellers.

I'm a System Integrator. I have experience in virtual environments and with clients. I have some moderate experience with implementation and some bigger experience in supporting this product. I'm not an expert in the field, however, I'm trying to be.

I don't have any issues with the solution. It's pretty problem-free in general. Overall, I would rate it at a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: reseller
PeerSpot user
Technical Specialist - Network & Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Easy to use, simple to install, and offers good technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is easy to install. It's a straightforward process."
  • "Currently, the product offers everything we need. I can't recall any features that may be lacking."

What is most valuable?

The load balancing is very good.

The tech support is helpful and knowledgeable.

Everything is okay within the solution. It works well.

The product offers pretty good security.

The solution is easy to install. It's a straightforward process.

The interface is excellent.

We've found the product overall to be simple and easy to use.

What needs improvement?

Currently, the product offers everything we need. I can't recall any features that may be lacking.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've only used the solution for one year. In comparison, I've used Radware for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We've had the solution installed for a year now and it is working as it should. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it stable and reliable. It's been a good experience so far.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product can scale quite well. We haven't had any issues. If a company needs to expand it out, they should be able to do so without trouble.

Right now, I'm the only one at the office who uses the product.

How are customer service and technical support?

I've been in contact with technical support in the past. So far, I've been happy with their level of service. They have been very helpful and responsive overall. I don't have any complaints.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use Radware, which we've used a bit longer.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup isn't too complex. We can handle the process pretty well. It's straightforward. I consider it to be pretty easy. There's no difficulties during the instllation.

What other advice do I have?

I'm not sure of which version of the solution we're using right now. I have a few customers who are using it, and they may be using different solutions.

I'd recommend the solution. Our customers seem to be very happy with it.

Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
it_user526731 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Network Engineer at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
Superior Alternative To DNS Round-Robin Load Balancing
Pros and Cons
  • "Great load balancing."
  • "Fixing bugs."

What is most valuable?

  • Great load balancing
  • Solid OS
  • Great support

How has it helped my organization?

Far superior to DNS Round-Robin load balancing; great HTTP and HTTPs redirection.

What needs improvement?

Fixing bugs.

For how long have I used the solution?

About 11 years, I believe.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Older OS releases may have had some bugs (active/active on reboot, I think we saw on one OS version). Very stable OS over all. We had one issue on our upgrade to 11.x where I had to engage F5 support. But they resolved it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No.

How are customer service and technical support?

Excellent.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.

How was the initial setup?

Pretty straightforward. The first generation of Big-IP we had, we did a crossover heartbeat cable, but our current one just uses a switched network.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Great product for the money. But they can get really expensive, so get what meets your needs. They do have some expensive extras like GTM, which has both hardware and licensing costs for multiple datacenters.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Citrix, NetScaler.

What other advice do I have?

Check with your IT staff and developers and agree on your needs, and buy accordingly. VM instances are now also available. They don’t have an end-to-end analytics package yet (supposedly in development), to troubleshoot users' experience to the back end nodes. (Citrix offers a product called MAS).

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Member Technical at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
The iRules feature helps routing meet our complex application’s architecture. It logs all of the details, which helps troubleshooting.

Valuable Features

iRules are so helpful in meeting our complex application’s architecture in case of routing. The requests have to be routed according to the cookies and headers of the host name itself. And also we can log the details, which helps us a lot in troubleshooting.

Using the “repeat” option when creating multiple virtual servers, we are able to create as many virtual IPs as we can as we go. This reduces a lot of configuration time.

Improvements to My Organization

My organization has various kinds of routing requirements and we have achieved it using F5’s iRules. Also with different load balancing options, many applications have benefited a lot.

Room for Improvement

Active-Standby sync has to be made automatic.

All of the F5 boxes have an Active-Standby configuration. Users need to make changes in the Active box, but often users by mistake make changes in the Standby box. This creates problems when syncing between Active and Standby. There should be some indication from the F5 tool to avoid such mistakes.

Use of Solution

I have used it for the past year.

Customer Service and Technical Support

All of the support I require is available on the internet.

Other Advice

The BigIP F5 tool is applicable to all types of infrastructure. I would recommend this tool to others.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.