We are using it primarily for load balancing. We also make great use of SSL interception (offloading and onloading), packet inspection, rewriting, and DNS wide IP.
Security Governance at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Along with load balancing, we perform a lot of packet inspections, URL rewriting, and SSL interceptions via iRule
Pros and Cons
- "It is a very good, flexible solution. It helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature."
- "Along with load balancing, we perform a lot of packet inspections, URL rewriting, and SSL interceptions via iRule."
- "Needs to provide a visual interface to follow a customer's activity (from client to BIG-IP to SNAT IP to the chosen server, then back). Today, we are still performing packet captures."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It is a very good, flexible solution. It helps us to catch up on flaws in our partner solutions on top of its load balancing feature.
What is most valuable?
Along with load balancing, we perform a lot of packet inspections, URL rewriting, and SSL interceptions via iRule.
What needs improvement?
I would recommend that the cost be lowered.
User tracking: Needs to provide a visual interface to follow a customer's activity (from client to BIG-IP to SNAT IP to the chosen server, then back). Today, we are still performing packet captures.
Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Not so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Not so far.
How are customer service and support?
So far, we have not had to contact them.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Cisco ACE, which has very limited features.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. The GUI interface is user-friendly.
Software upgrades have been performed by F5 teams.
What about the implementation team?
The initial migration was done by our technical team.
The last implementation was done by the F5 team. I would rate them as a nine out of 10. I am not giving a 10 because we encountered some difficulties with the software upgrade from version 11 to version 12.
What was our ROI?
ROI is four years.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you are planning to use security features, better to go for strong hardware and the best bundle license, which is great for web security.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Improved our organization's performance by increasing the uptime of our applications
Pros and Cons
- "I have never faced any stability issues with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)."
- "One improvement could be updating the user interface (UI)."
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) for server load balancing and SSL offloading. The tool helps offload the SSL processes instead of having the servers handle it. Additionally, we use the Web Application Firewall (WAF) application for protecting our servers.
How has it helped my organization?
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has improved our organization's performance by increasing the uptime of our applications. By including redundancies for applications, the traffic is balanced across multiple servers, which helps secure our processes.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) are server load balancing and SSL offloading or termination. These features help protect our servers and improve application uptime.
While F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is not a do-it-all solution, it has a feature called iRules that allows customization of the device's non-default functionality.
What needs improvement?
One improvement could be updating the user interface (UI).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never faced any stability issues with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I do not have any complaints about scalability or technical issues with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
How are customer service and support?
Customer service and support depend on prioritization. However, support is good and on par with other solutions. They follow their SLAs precisely to reach out to us based on the priority of the issue.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
There are many competitors in the load balancing market. However, F5 has been a leader in load balancing solutions for many years. They offer a 'Swiss Army knife' approach with multiple functionalities like synchronization.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
There are multiple solutions available in the market. I chose to work with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) due to its comprehensive features and leadership in the industry.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Nov 17, 2024
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Director at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Good depiction of profiles, very easy to set up, and very stable
Pros and Cons
- "iRules are very valuable. In addition to that, the way profiles are depicted by the LTM is also very good."
- "A lot of functions that are attributed to iRules can actually be simple profile changes. iRules do have a certain performance impact. Therefore, instead of writing simple iRules, they can create certain profiles for classes that will perform the same function."
What is most valuable?
iRules are very valuable. In addition to that, the way profiles are depicted by the LTM is also very good.
What needs improvement?
A lot of functions that are attributed to iRules can actually be simple profile changes. iRules do have a certain performance impact. Therefore, instead of writing simple iRules, they can create certain profiles for classes that will perform the same function.
Its scalability and pricing can also be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than 12 years. We are currently using version 15.1.2. The latest one is 16.0, but we are still evaluating it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is not scalable. It is a licensed product. They are coming up with some scalable options, but for existing products, throughput is limited. Currently, if you have a 200 Mbps license, then it can go to a maximum of 200 Mbps. If you want it to go further than that, then you have to buy a new license.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their technical support is good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've been working for 12 years, and F5 was the first LTM product. In addition to F5, I've also worked on Citrix NetScaler, Load Balancer, Kemp, and Cisco ACE (no longer in service). I prefer F5 over all of them.
How was the initial setup?
Its initial setup is very easy. The biggest advantage that F5 has is that its initial setup is very simple.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is quite expensive as a product. Because it is very stable, it is also expensive.
What other advice do I have?
For mission-critical applications, you can trust F5 with any of your load balancing functions. However, if you have a UAT environment or a test setup, it won't be suitable because it is a pricey product. You can then go for an open-source product or any software with load balancers. VMware has recently come up with AVI load balancers.
I would rate F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) an eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good customization with knowledgeable and responsive support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is customization."
- "I would like to see better integration."
What is our primary use case?
We are using this solution as a load balancer and reverse proxy.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is customization.
What needs improvement?
We are currently using BIG-IP and NetScaler and we wanted to have just one technology. We will be replacing F5 in March.
NetScaler is primarily used for Citrix purposes and BIG-IP is being used as a reverse proxy for our other applications. We would like to manage it easily with one technology.
I would like to see better integration. I can remember when we were implementing ADFS, we had some challenges.
There is not a lot of documentation available where you can refer to and configure any new technologies.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with F5 BIG-IP for approximately seven years but our organization has been using this solution for 13 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is stable. We have not experienced any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable solution and we have not had any limitations. We have approximately 3,000 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is very good in terms of their technical knowledge and assistance.
We have had contact with both F5 and Citrix.
F5 has a good technical team who can assist and understand the problem and respond quickly. However, Citrix has been a challenge for us.
How was the initial setup?
When we were setting up for Azure we had some challenges.
We have an internal team of two for maintenance and reporting.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
I need to have a deeper understanding of F5 technology.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Security Engineer at a cloud solution provider with 11-50 employees
High quality and stable; traffic learning feature provides great information
Pros and Cons
- "Traffic Learning is the most valuable feature."
- "This is a very expensive solution."
What is our primary use case?
We use the whole pallet of the Big-IP products starting with the Application Security Management, the web application firewall for the F5. We use it for the protection of files at sites and we also use the load balancer. I also have experience with the airlock and we're now researching the possibility of exchanging our Big-IP system with something else. We're hoping to find a solution that's better for the cloud but which can be a hybrid. We have a partnership with several vendors and I work as an IT security engineer.
What is most valuable?
I've found Traffic Learning to be the most valuable feature in this solution.
What needs improvement?
This solution could be improved by reducing the cost. It's the main reason that we're considering another option for our website even though we're very satisfied with the way the Big-IP works and the way Big-IP protects our environment, but it's very expensive. We are keen to find out if there is a similar system for technology that would suit us and cost less.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a very stable solution. I've been using their products for years and have never had any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This solution scales with ease. You can add equipment, reduce equipment, add configs, it is very flexible.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support respond quickly and they are helpful. Their communities are very involved. I would say I'm super satisfied.
How was the initial setup?
Sometimes implementation is simple and sometimes it's complex, it really depends on the situation. If you've done it before, deployment can be accomplished in half an hour, but if it's from scratch it can take anywhere up to two days. For anyone with experience in deploying this kind of equipment, it's usual that something always happens and problems arise. It usually takes one or two engineers to carry out the deployment.
What other advice do I have?
I don't have much advice other than to suggest that people look for high quality solutions to implement. It's really about what the client wants and if they're prepared to take the risk of a less expensive solution they need to realize that it might also mean a product that is less good quality.
I would rate this product a nine out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Lead Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Local Traffic Manager load balances our web applications, does SSL decryption, and application adjusting
Pros and Cons
- "The Local Traffic Manager (LTM) provides a simple low balance and SSL decryption, in addition to some TCP parameters, for incoming and outgoing traffic to redirect appropriate traffic patterns to appropriate servers."
- "We are using Application Security Manager (ASM) as a web application firewall, where there is a security signature to avoid a web level breach."
- "I would like to see F-5 implement a regular routing like in other Linux-based devices. When we try and integrate in some complex networks, we have to use some additional routing scenarios from a Layer 3 perspective, then we have some problems. It would be great if this were fixed somehow."
What is our primary use case?
There is more than one use case. The most important is the Local Traffic Manager (LTM). We are using it to load balance our web applications, SSL decryption and application adjusting, along with some TCP features. We are also load balancing traffic between appropriate back-ends for risk.
How has it helped my organization?
We can use it for load balancing purposes on an HA proxy software. However, hardware load balancing is the best way due to some hardware flaws for incoming traffic. We are not using CPU resources for a load balancing SSL decryption and adjusting some parameters for incoming and outgoing traffic. F-5 has a lot of appliances, which can be used for appropriate tasks, e.g., for big tasks, we can use Vipiron devices. As well, we have a lot of software blades, which can be divided into virtual clusters, multi-purposes, etc.
What is most valuable?
We are using the Big-IP, LTM, ASM, and GTM modules.
- The Local Traffic Manager (LTM) provides a simple low balance and SSL decryption, in addition to some TCP parameters, for incoming and outgoing traffic to redirect appropriate traffic patterns to appropriate servers.
- We are using Application Security Manager (ASM) as a web application firewall, where there is a security signature to avoid a web level breach.
- We are using global traffic manager (GTM). Its main use cases is for application firewall modules, therefore we are not using it yet, but we are going to implement it for DDoS protection on some of our web services.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see F-5 implement a regular routing like in other Linux-based devices. We know the F-5 is not a router, but can be used for traffic forwarding, so it's not the same as other devices if we compare it with Citrix-based devices. It is a simple Linux-based routing software. I don't have any problems with it. However, in F-5, when we try and integrate in some complex networks, we have to use some additional routing scenarios from a Layer 3 perspective, then we have some problems. It would be great if this were fixed somehow.
We have to keep in mind features when we deploy an F-5 solution. Designing the same approach in Citrix can often be simpler. I have written syntax in F-5 which were complicated; not straightforward. For example, in a Citrix device, we have a lot of predefined patterns, and it's much simpler to implement.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not had issues with the stability, though we have experienced issues with the flexibility.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support of F-5 is fine. In comparison with Citrix, F-5 technical support is much better.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Citrix NetScaler:
- Citrix NetScaler SDX, which can be divided in multiple instances.
- Citrix VPX.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing strategy for F5 is good.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
System Engineer at PT Nusantara Compnet Integrator
Has good support and valuable load balancing features
Pros and Cons
- "To improve the product, they could add more load balancing solutions in Kubernetes."
What is our primary use case?
Currently, we use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager as our traffic management solution. As a consultant, it is project-based with my clients rather than hands-on. Our clients use the solution to load balance their current application server in the DMZ and also in the data center.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of the F5 BIG-IP LTM solution is load balancing.
What needs improvement?
To improve the product, they could add more load balancing solutions in Kubernetes.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using F5 BIG-IP LTM for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
F5 BIG-IP is a stable solution. It is quite mature and does not have many concerns.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is good. We use it for active and passive, and we also do some TCMP.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate technical support a four out of five. Their support is quite good, however, they could be a bit more responsive and react faster to requests.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The biggest concern for my clients is the pricing.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing F5 BIG-IP, we compared the product with other vendors. We chose F5 BIG because of its technical support as well as its documentation. Their knowledge base is easy to read and access to information is available on their website. It is a complete product for an ADC solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the solution an eight out of ten and recommend this solution to users that are looking to use it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Channel Development Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Secure access and optimization of access to applications are excellent features
Pros and Cons
- "NetFlow balancing and traffic balancing are good features."
- "A more intuitive interface would be helpful."
What is our primary use case?
We are in the security business, basically working in two segments; the first is in the financial sector, with the largest banks in the country, and second, we work with some government organizations and corporate businesses. Only B2B for now, not much retail. We have a few projects in insurance companies. The solution is deployed on-premise in our office and we basically use it for demo and testing purposes. We deploy for our customers both on-premise and on cloud. We are a distribution channel, like a reseller. I'm a channel development manager.
What is most valuable?
For BIG-IP, I think the most requested functionality is its NetFlow balancing and traffic balancing, as well as its secure access and its optimization of access to applications. The solution is the most requested by our customers, so it's an important direction for our business.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see a more intuitive interface. The market now is moving into salvage services, different kinds of services, not only hardware solutions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for four months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable, we have around 200 users in our company. In terms of our customers, there would probably be over 1,000 users. We have a huge company, but our department for network security products consists of about 25 people. In half of them, users are the technical specialists.
How are customer service and technical support?
We're just starting to work on setting up our own support service for clients. We hope that maybe next year we could add support products to our product line also.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have other vendors in our portfolio, all of them working for performance network, performance optimization, and application implementation. We generally propose a few solutions to our customers.
How was the initial setup?
We have a technical department with a lot of certified specialists who work on the implementation side of things and we also support some of our departments and external clients. It's not my area of expertise.
What other advice do I have?
We are planning to expand to other segments in the market, healthcare or logistics or even some FMCG retail companies. We hope the F5 solutions will help us to expand. We intend to continue providing this solution and to involve more partners in the F5 business. I would recommend this solution.
I would rate this solution a nine out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Fortinet FortiADC
Kemp LoadMaster
Radware Alteon
A10 Networks Thunder ADC
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Loadbalancer.org
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Radware LinkProof
Array APV Series
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- F5 BIG-IP vs. Radware Alteon Comparison
- What is the performance parameter of Imperva X10K versus BIG-IP i2600?
- What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
- What are the pros and cons of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for a large construction company?
- When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
- Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
- What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
- Why do I need an ADC solution?