We use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager for our applications. We have six applications and 16 servers currently. We make all our applications and utilize this tool. Some applications are published on LSM.
The price for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is very high. This aspect could be improved.
I've used F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) for one year, within the last year.
We find this tool stable. We are sensitive to changes, and for us, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is stable.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is scalable.
We had a good setup experience with this tool, but we had to raise a ticket with support for assistance.
We implemented F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager ourselves. We didn't use a consultant or integrator for implementation, but we contacted their support team.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is a high-priced tool. We pay for its license yearly.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager has good performance.
Your success with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager will depend on how much you understand how the application is working.
Deployment of this tool took two hours.
We have 600 users of this tool, and currently, there's no requirement for increasing its usage.
We have one manager and two technical staff who takes care of the deployment and maintenance of this tool. They're building applications, and they're using this tool.
I'm recommending F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to others who want to start using it.
On a scale from one to ten, with one being the worst and ten being the best, I'm rating F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) an eight.